These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37350401)

  • 1. The modulating effect of musical expertise on lexical-semantic prediction in speech-in-noise comprehension: Evidence from an EEG study.
    Zheng Y; Gao P; Li X
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Nov; 60(11):e14371. PubMed ID: 37350401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of musical expertise on anticipatory semantic processing during online speech comprehension: An electroencephalography study.
    Zheng Y; Zhao Z; Yang X; Li X
    Brain Lang; 2021 Oct; 221():105006. PubMed ID: 34392023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Musicians and the metric structure of words.
    Marie C; Magne C; Besson M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 23(2):294-305. PubMed ID: 20044890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of musicianship on the cortical mechanisms related to separating speech from background noise.
    Zendel BR; Tremblay CD; Belleville S; Peretz I
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):1044-59. PubMed ID: 25390195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Musical training shapes neural responses to melodic and prosodic expectation.
    Zioga I; Di Bernardi Luft C; Bhattacharya J
    Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 1650():267-282. PubMed ID: 27622645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Musical Experience Offsets Age-Related Decline in Understanding Speech-in-Noise: Type of Training Does Not Matter, Working Memory Is the Key.
    Zhang L; Fu X; Luo D; Xing L; Du Y
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(2):258-270. PubMed ID: 32826504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech comprehension in noisy environments: Evidence from the predictability effects on the N400 and LPC.
    Hsin CH; Chao PC; Lee CY
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1105346. PubMed ID: 36874840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Graded expectations: Predictive processing and the adjustment of expectations during spoken language comprehension.
    Boudewyn MA; Long DL; Swaab TY
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 15(3):607-24. PubMed ID: 25673006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech-brain phase coupling is enhanced in low contextual semantic predictability conditions.
    Molinaro N; Lizarazu M; Baldin V; Pérez-Navarro J; Lallier M; Ríos-López P
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jun; 156():107830. PubMed ID: 33771540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The dynamic influence of emotional words on sentence comprehension: An ERP study.
    Ding J; Wang L; Yang Y
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 16(3):433-46. PubMed ID: 26833049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relation between thematic role computing and semantic relatedness processing during on-line sentence comprehension.
    Li X; Zhao H; Lu Y
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95834. PubMed ID: 24755643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Internal mechanisms underlying anticipatory language processing: Evidence from event-related-potentials and neural oscillations.
    Li X; Zhang Y; Xia J; Swaab TY
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jul; 102():70-81. PubMed ID: 28522331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Confusing similar words: ERP correlates of lexical-semantic processing in first language attrition and late second language acquisition.
    Kasparian K; Steinhauer K
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):200-217. PubMed ID: 27751710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Re-examination of Chinese semantic processing and syntactic processing: evidence from conventional ERPs and reconstructed ERPs by residue iteration decomposition (RIDE).
    Wang F; Ouyang G; Zhou C; Wang S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(1):e0117324. PubMed ID: 25615600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining EEG and 3D-eye-tracking to study the prediction of upcoming speech in naturalistic virtual environments: A proof of principle.
    Huizeling E; Alday PM; Peeters D; Hagoort P
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Dec; 191():108730. PubMed ID: 37939871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No Musician Advantage in the Perception of Degraded-Fundamental Frequency Speech in Noisy Environments.
    Hsieh IH; Guo YJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Aug; 66(8):2643-2655. PubMed ID: 37499233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The music of language: an ERP investigation of the effects of musical training on emotional prosody processing.
    Pinheiro AP; Vasconcelos M; Dias M; Arrais N; Gonçalves ÓF
    Brain Lang; 2015 Jan; 140():24-34. PubMed ID: 25461917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Musicians detect pitch violation in a foreign language better than nonmusicians: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Marques C; Moreno S; Castro SL; Besson M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Sep; 19(9):1453-63. PubMed ID: 17714007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Music, language and meaning: brain signatures of semantic processing.
    Koelsch S; Kasper E; Sammler D; Schulze K; Gunter T; Friederici AD
    Nat Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 7(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 14983184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.