BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37350418)

  • 21. Prognostic significance of solid growth in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.
    Akar S; Çelik ZE; Fındık S; İlhan TT; Ercan F; Çelik Ç
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):195-202. PubMed ID: 31452018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predicting Model of Lymph Node Metastasis Using Preoperative Tumor Grade, Transvaginal Ultrasound, and Serum CA-125 Level in Patients With Endometrial Cancer.
    Lee J; Kong TW; Paek J; Chang SJ; Ryu HS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Nov; 26(9):1630-1635. PubMed ID: 27654258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Is Surgical Staging Necessary for Patients with Low-risk Endometrial Cancer? A Retrospective Clinical Analysis.
    Kokcu A; Kurtoglu E; Celik H; Kefeli M; Tosun M; Onal M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(13):5331-5. PubMed ID: 26225674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence in lymphovascular space invasion positive women with stage IIIC endometriod endometrial cancer.
    Cuylan ZF; Oz M; Ozkan NT; Comert GK; Sahin H; Turan T; Akbayir O; Kuscu E; Celik H; Dede M; Gungor T; Meydanli MM; Ayhan A
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Jun; 44(6):1140-1149. PubMed ID: 29516573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Incidence of Lymph Node Metastasis in Surgically Staged FIGO IA G1/G2 Endometrial Cancer With a Tumor Size of More Than 2 cm.
    Boyraz G; Salman MC; Gultekin M; Basaran D; Cagan M; Ozgul N; Yuce K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Mar; 27(3):486-492. PubMed ID: 28187095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis from ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in lymph node metastases and risk stratification of endometrial carcinoma.
    Liu DD; Li J; Li X; Xie L; Qin L; Peng F; Cheng MH
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 30(6):e89. PubMed ID: 31576685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluation of tumor-free distance and depth of myometrial invasion as prognostic factors for lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer.
    Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S; van Vugt S; Sanday K; Nicklin J; Land R; Perrin L; Crandon A; Obermair A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1217-21. PubMed ID: 21495232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and outcomes in uterine carcinosarcoma and grade 3 endometrial cancer patients: a comparative study.
    Zhu J; Wen H; Bi R; Wu X
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Mar; 27(2):e18. PubMed ID: 26463439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. FIGO staging of endometrial cancer: 2023.
    Berek JS; Matias-Guiu X; Creutzberg C; Fotopoulou C; Gaffney D; Kehoe S; Lindemann K; Mutch D; Concin N;
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Aug; 162(2):383-394. PubMed ID: 37337978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of correlation of pre-therapeutic assessment and the final diagnosis in endometrial cancer: role of tumor volume in the magnetic resonance imaging.
    López-González E; García-Jiménez R; Rodríguez-Jiménez A; Rojas-Luna JA; Daza-Manzano C; Gómez-Salgado J; Álvarez RM
    Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1219818. PubMed ID: 37655105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule as a Predictor of Disease-Specific Survival and Patterns of Relapse in Endometrial Cancer.
    Pasanen A; Tuomi T; Isola J; Staff S; Bützow R; Loukovaara M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Oct; 26(8):1465-71. PubMed ID: 27648714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical significance of tumor volume in endometrial cancer: a Japan-Korea cooperative study.
    Todo Y; Choi HJ; Kang S; Kim JW; Nam JH; Watari H; Tamakoshi A; Sakuragi N
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 131(2):294-8. PubMed ID: 23954595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Whole-Volume Tumor MRI Radiomics for Prognostic Modeling in Endometrial Cancer.
    Fasmer KE; Hodneland E; Dybvik JA; Wagner-Larsen K; Trovik J; Salvesen Ø; Krakstad C; Haldorsen IHS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Mar; 53(3):928-937. PubMed ID: 33200420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ultrasound-based risk model for preoperative prediction of lymph-node metastases in women with endometrial cancer: model-development study.
    Eriksson LSE; Epstein E; Testa AC; Fischerova D; Valentin L; Sladkevicius P; Franchi D; Frühauf F; Fruscio R; Haak LA; Opolskiene G; Mascilini F; Alcazar JL; Van Holsbeke C; Chiappa V; Bourne T; Lindqvist PG; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Verbakel JY; Van den Bosch T; Wynants L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Sep; 56(3):443-452. PubMed ID: 31840873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Outcomes of Patients With Surgically and Pathologically Staged IIIA-IVB Pure Endometrioid-type Endometrial Cancer: A Taiwanese Gynecology Oncology Group (TGOG-2005) Retrospective Cohort Study (A STROBE-Compliant Article).
    Chen JR; Chang TC; Fu HC; Lau HY; Chen IH; Ke YM; Liang YL; Chiang AJ; Huang CY; Chen YC; Hong MK; Wang YC; Huang KF; Hsiao SM; Wang PH
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Apr; 95(15):e3330. PubMed ID: 27082583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Preoperative cervical cytology in endometrial carcinoma and its clinicopathologic relevance.
    Fukuda K; Mori M; Uchiyama M; Iwai K; Iwasaka T; Sugimori H; Yamasaki F
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Mar; 72(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 10053095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Nomogram to Predict Risk of Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer.
    Pollom EL; Conklin CM; von Eyben R; Folkins AK; Kidd EA
    Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2016 Sep; 35(5):395-401. PubMed ID: 26598977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prospective evaluation of prognostic significance of the tumor-free distance from uterine serosa in surgically staged endometrial adenocarcinoma.
    Schwab KV; O'Malley DM; Fowler JM; Copeland LJ; Cohn DE
    Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jan; 112(1):146-9. PubMed ID: 18937970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Are uterine risk factors more important than nodal status in predicting survival in endometrial cancer?
    Kwon JS; Qiu F; Saskin R; Carey MS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 114(4):736-743. PubMed ID: 19888029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Risk factors for lymph node metastases in women with endometrial cancer: A population-based, nation-wide register study-On behalf of the Swedish Gynecological Cancer Group.
    Stålberg K; Kjølhede P; Bjurberg M; Borgfeldt C; Dahm-Kähler P; Falconer H; Holmberg E; Staf C; Tholander B; Åvall-Lundqvist E; Rosenberg P; Högberg T
    Int J Cancer; 2017 Jun; 140(12):2693-2700. PubMed ID: 28340503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.