These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3735050)

  • 1. Vacuum extraction: a randomized controlled comparison of the New Generation cup with the original Bird cup.
    Carmody F; Grant A; Somchiwong M
    J Perinat Med; 1986; 14(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 3735050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A multicentre randomized trial comparing delivery with a silicone rubber cup and rigid metal vacuum extractor cups.
    Cohn M; Barclay C; Fraser R; Zaklama M; Johanson R; Anderson D; Walker C
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 May; 96(5):545-51. PubMed ID: 2667629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between the conventional Malmström extractor and a new extractor with Silastic cup.
    Hammarström M; Csemiczky G; Belfrage P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1986; 65(7):791-2. PubMed ID: 3544665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical assessment of the Kobayashi vacuum extractor.
    Maryniak GM; Frank JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Sep; 64(3):431-5. PubMed ID: 6462575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft cup vacuum extraction: a comparison of outlet delivery.
    Dell DL; Sightler SE; Plauché WC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 4058820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomized prospective study comparing delivery with metal and silicone rubber vacuum extractor cups.
    Chenoy R; Johanson R
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 May; 99(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 1622904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Beucher G; Dupuis O; Feraud O; Simon-Toulza C; Sentilhes L; Meunier E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Riethmuller D; Baud O; Galley-Raulin F; Diemunsch P; Pierre F; Schaal JP; Fournié A; Oury JF;
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 21802193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized study of two cups for vacuum extraction.
    Thiery M; van den Broecke R; Kermans G; Parewijck W; Dhont M; Vanlancker M; van Kets H; Defoort P; Derom R; Vanhaesebrouck P
    J Perinat Med; 1987; 15(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 3656045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison between metal cup and silicone rubber cup vacuum extractor.
    Loghis C; Pyrgiotis E; Panayotopoulos N; Batalias L; Salamalekis E; Zourlas PA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1992 Jul; 45(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 1511762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New design rigid and soft vacuum extractor cups: a preliminary comparison of traction forces.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gobetz L; Sonnendecker EW; Turner MJ
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Aug; 97(8):681-5. PubMed ID: 2205287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized comparison of vacuum extraction delivery with a rigid and a pliable cup.
    Kuit JA; Eppinga HG; Wallenburg HC; Huikeshoven FJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 8336878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of vacuum extraction delivery between the conventional metal cup and the new soft rubber cup.
    Srisomboon J; Piyamongkol W; Sahapong V; Mongkolchaipak S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1998 Jul; 81(7):480-6. PubMed ID: 9676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical impact of the disposable ventouse iCup® versus a metallic vacuum cup: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Equy V; David-Tchouda S; Dreyfus M; Riethmuller D; Vendittelli F; Cabaud V; Langer B; Margier J; Bosson JL; Schaal JP
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2015 Dec; 15():332. PubMed ID: 26666981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of the vacuum extractor.
    Bird GC
    Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Dec; 9(3):641-61. PubMed ID: 6756751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The importance of flexion in vacuum extractor delivery.
    Bird GC
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1976 Mar; 83(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 1252384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomised controlled trial of two instruments for vacuum-assisted delivery (Vacca Re-Usable OmniCup and the Bird anterior and posterior cups) to compare failure rates, safety and use effectiveness.
    Mola GD; Kuk JM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Jun; 50(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 20618242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Precision of vacuum cup placement and its association with subgaleal hemorrhage and associated morbidity in term neonates.
    Kong CW; To WWK
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Apr; 309(4):1411-1419. PubMed ID: 37017783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cohort study of Silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: II. Unsuccessful vacuum extraction.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown KJ; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Nov; 68(5):662-6. PubMed ID: 3763080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Vacuum extractor: a safe instrument?
    Ngan HY; Tang GW; Ma HK
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Aug; 26(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 3468937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.
    Berkus MD; Ramamurthy RS; O'Connor PS; Brown K; Hayashi RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Oct; 66(4):503-9. PubMed ID: 3900836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.