These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37353615)

  • 1. An innovative probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set MCDM perspective for selecting flexible packaging bags after the prohibition on single-use plastics.
    Jeon J; Krishnan S; Manirathinam T; Narayanamoorthy S; Nazir Ahmad M; Ferrara M; Ahmadian A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):10206. PubMed ID: 37353615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Making Group Decisions within the Framework of a Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Linear Regression Model.
    Sultan A; Sałabun W; Faizi S; Ismail M; Shekhovtsov A
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jul; 22(15):. PubMed ID: 35957293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A novel MCDM approach to selecting a biodegradable dynamic plastic product: a probabilistic hesitant fuzzy set-based COPRAS method.
    Kang D; Jaisankar R; Murugesan V; Suvitha K; Narayanamoorthy S; Omar AH; Arshad NI; Ahmadian A
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Aug; 340():117967. PubMed ID: 37119624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An extended TDM method under probabilistic interval-valued hesitant fuzzy environment for stock selection.
    Noor Q; Rashid T; Husnine SM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0252115. PubMed ID: 34043667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Integrated MCDM Approaches for Exploring the Ideal Therapeutic Plastic Disposal Technology: Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Domain.
    Jaisankar R; Murugesan V; Narayanamoorthy S; Ahmadian A; Suvitha K; Ferrara M; Kang D
    Water Air Soil Pollut; 2023; 234(2):71. PubMed ID: 36713935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multi-attribute decision-making method based on q-rung orthopair probabilistic hesitant fuzzy schweizer-sklar power weighted hamy mean operator.
    Chen Z; Shen D; Yu F; Tang X; Zhang Z
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0266779. PubMed ID: 36791142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A novel MCGDM technique based on correlation coefficients under probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment and its application in clinical comprehensive evaluation of orphan drugs.
    Hu Y; Pang Z
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0303042. PubMed ID: 38709744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On SIR-based MCDM approach: Selecting a charcoal firm using hybrid fuzzy number on a Triple Vague structure.
    Rajadurai M; Kaliyaperumal P
    Heliyon; 2024 Jan; 10(2):e24248. PubMed ID: 38293499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Picture fuzzy WASPAS method for selecting last-mile delivery mode: a case study of Belgrade.
    Simić V; Lazarević D; Dobrodolac M
    Eur Transp Res Rev; 2021; 13(1):43. PubMed ID: 38624967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An Integrated MCDM Model for Conveyor Equipment Evaluation and Selection in an FMC Based on a Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy ARAS in the Presence of Vagueness.
    Nguyen HT; Dawal SZ; Nukman Y; Rifai AP; Aoyama H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153222. PubMed ID: 27070543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the COVID-19 Pandemic Intervention Strategies with Hesitant F-AHP.
    Samanlioglu F; Kaya BE
    J Healthc Eng; 2020; 2020():8835258. PubMed ID: 32850105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of Influenza Intervention Strategies in Turkey with Fuzzy AHP-VIKOR.
    Samanlioglu F
    J Healthc Eng; 2019; 2019():9486070. PubMed ID: 31827743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Utility Set and Its Application in Selection of Fire Rescue Plans.
    Liao H; Si G; Xu Z; Fujita H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 29614019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic multicriteria decision-making method based on generalized prioritized aggregation operator.
    Wu JT; Wang JQ; Wang J; Zhang HY; Chen XH
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():645341. PubMed ID: 25258729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel intuitionistic fuzzy MCDM-based CODAS approach for locating an authorized dismantling center: a case study of Istanbul.
    Karagoz S; Deveci M; Simic V; Aydin N; Bolukbas U
    Waste Manag Res; 2020 Jun; 38(6):660-672. PubMed ID: 31969081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interactive group decision making method based on probabilistic hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy information representation.
    Sun G; Hua W; Wang G
    Appl Intell (Dordr); 2022; 52(15):18226-18247. PubMed ID: 35855435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Offshore wind power station (OWPS) site selection using a two-stage MCDM-based spherical fuzzy set approach.
    Wang CN; Nguyen NA; Dang TT
    Sci Rep; 2022 Mar; 12(1):4260. PubMed ID: 35277582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hesitant triangular fuzzy information aggregation operators based on Bonferroni means and their application to multiple attribute decision making.
    Wang C; Li Q; Zhou X; Yang T
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():648516. PubMed ID: 25140338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel extended approach under hesitant fuzzy sets to design a framework for assessing the key challenges of digital health interventions adoption during the COVID-19 outbreak.
    Mardani A; Saraji MK; Mishra AR; Rani P
    Appl Soft Comput; 2020 Nov; 96():106613. PubMed ID: 32834799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bimodal fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (BFAHP) for coronary heart disease risk assessment.
    Sabahi F
    J Biomed Inform; 2018 Jul; 83():204-216. PubMed ID: 29625186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.