These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37354156)

  • 1. The Real Secret to Getting Published: Responding to Reviewers.
    Clark PC; Spratling R; Aycock DM; Marcus J
    J Pediatr Health Care; 2023; 37(5):570-574. PubMed ID: 37354156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Responding to reviewers' comments as part of writing for publication.
    Happell B
    Nurse Res; 2011; 18(4):23-7. PubMed ID: 21853889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Revision of manuscripts for scholarly publication.
    Dowd SB; McElveny C
    Radiol Technol; 1997; 69(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 9323765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: Revising a Peer-reviewed Manuscript.
    Bahadoran Z; Mirmiran P; Kashfi K; Ghasemi A
    Int J Endocrinol Metab; 2022 Jan; 20(1):e120366. PubMed ID: 35432554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5.
    Verharen JPH
    Elife; 2023 Nov; 12():. PubMed ID: 37922198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. JACLP Guide for Manuscript Peer Review: How to Perform a Peer Review and How to Be Responsive to Reviewer Comments.
    Oldham MA; Kontos N; Baller E; Cerimele JM
    J Acad Consult Liaison Psychiatry; 2023; 64(5):468-472. PubMed ID: 36796760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The rites of writing papers: steps to successful publishing for psychiatrists.
    Brakoulias V; Macfarlane MD; Looi JC
    Australas Psychiatry; 2015 Feb; 23(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 25469001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preparing reports for publication and responding to reviewers' comments.
    Guyatt GH; Brian Haynes R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Sep; 59(9):900-6. PubMed ID: 16895811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Publishing your scholarship: a survey of pearls from top reviewers.
    Jauregui J; Artino AR; Ilgen JS; Sullivan G; van Schaik SM
    Med Educ Online; 2022 Dec; 27(1):2016561. PubMed ID: 34994681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dealing with returned manuscripts.
    Peh WC; Ng KH
    Singapore Med J; 2009 Nov; 50(11):1050-2; quiz 1053. PubMed ID: 19960157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Manuscript rejection: how to submit a revision and tips on being a good peer reviewer.
    Kotsis SV; Chung KC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Apr; 133(4):958-964. PubMed ID: 24675196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol).
    Galipeau J; Moher D; Skidmore B; Campbell C; Hendry P; Cameron DW; Hébert PC; Palepu A
    Syst Rev; 2013 Jun; 2():41. PubMed ID: 23773340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [How to write and publish a scientific article in stomatology].
    Gao XJ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 52(12):758-761. PubMed ID: 29275572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What feedback do reviewers give when reviewing qualitative manuscripts? A focused mapping review and synthesis.
    Herber OR; Bradbury-Jones C; Böling S; Combes S; Hirt J; Koop Y; Nyhagen R; Veldhuizen JD; Taylor J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 May; 20(1):122. PubMed ID: 32423388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variability of Reviewers' Comments in the Peer Review Process for Orthopaedic Research.
    Iantorno SE; Andras LM; Skaggs DL
    Spine Deform; 2016 Jul; 4(4):268-271. PubMed ID: 27927515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surviving peer review.
    Weinstein R
    J Clin Apher; 2020 Sep; 35(5):469-476. PubMed ID: 32770560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study.
    Wager E; Parkin EC; Tamber PS
    BMC Med; 2006 May; 4():13. PubMed ID: 16734897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do's and Don'ts for a Good Reviewer of Scientific Papers: A Beginner's Brief Decalogue.
    Lazarides MK; Georgiadis GS; Papanas N
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2020 Sep; 19(3):227-229. PubMed ID: 32525721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports.
    Bordage G
    Acad Med; 2001 Sep; 76(9):889-96. PubMed ID: 11553504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Twelve tips for getting your manuscript published.
    Cook DA
    Med Teach; 2016; 38(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 26372399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.