These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37354350)

  • 1. P3-like signatures of temporal predictions: a computational EEG study.
    Visalli A; Capizzi M; Ambrosini E; Kopp B; Vallesi A
    Exp Brain Res; 2023 Jul; 241(7):1919-1930. PubMed ID: 37354350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electroencephalographic correlates of temporal Bayesian belief updating and surprise.
    Visalli A; Capizzi M; Ambrosini E; Kopp B; Vallesi A
    Neuroimage; 2021 May; 231():117867. PubMed ID: 33592246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian modeling of temporal expectations in the human brain.
    Visalli A; Capizzi M; Ambrosini E; Mazzonetto I; Vallesi A
    Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 202():116097. PubMed ID: 31415885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A computational analysis of the neural bases of Bayesian inference.
    Kolossa A; Kopp B; Fingscheidt T
    Neuroimage; 2015 Feb; 106():222-37. PubMed ID: 25462794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociable effects of surprise and model update in parietal and anterior cingulate cortex.
    O'Reilly JX; Schüffelgen U; Cuell SF; Behrens TE; Mars RB; Rushworth MF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Sep; 110(38):E3660-9. PubMed ID: 23986499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-Trial Event-Related Potential Correlates of Belief Updating(1,2,3).
    Bennett D; Murawski C; Bode S
    eNeuro; 2015 Sep; 2(5):. PubMed ID: 26473170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surprise About Sensory Event Timing Drives Cortical Transients in the Beta Frequency Band.
    Meindertsma T; Kloosterman NA; Engel AK; Wagenmakers EJ; Donner TH
    J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(35):7600-7610. PubMed ID: 30030396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Seeing the Error in My "
    Colantonio J; Bascandziev I; Theobald M; Brod G; Bonawitz E
    Entropy (Basel); 2023 Jan; 25(2):. PubMed ID: 36832578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trial-by-trial fluctuations in the event-related electroencephalogram reflect dynamic changes in the degree of surprise.
    Mars RB; Debener S; Gladwin TE; Harrison LM; Haggard P; Rothwell JC; Bestmann S
    J Neurosci; 2008 Nov; 28(47):12539-45. PubMed ID: 19020046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Frontal cortex tracks surprise separately for different sensory modalities but engages a common inhibitory control mechanism.
    Wessel JR; Huber DE
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Jul; 15(7):e1006927. PubMed ID: 31356593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monetary feedback modulates performance and electrophysiological indices of belief updating in reward learning.
    Bennett D; Sasmita K; Maloney RT; Murawski C; Bode S
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Oct; 56(10):e13431. PubMed ID: 31274199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual Mismatch and Predictive Coding: A Computational Single-Trial ERP Study.
    Stefanics G; Heinzle J; Horváth AA; Stephan KE
    J Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 38(16):4020-4030. PubMed ID: 29581379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neurocomputational Underpinnings of Expected Surprise.
    Lecaignard F; Bertrand O; Caclin A; Mattout J
    J Neurosci; 2022 Jan; 42(3):474-486. PubMed ID: 34819342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Working memory load-dependent spatio-temporal activity of single-trial P3 response detected with an adaptive wavelet denoiser.
    Zhang Q; Yang X; Yao L; Zhao X
    Neuroscience; 2017 Mar; 346():64-73. PubMed ID: 28108257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural correlates of valence-dependent belief and value updating during uncertainty reduction: An fNIRS study.
    Peng XR; Bundil I; Schulreich S; Li SC
    Neuroimage; 2023 Oct; 279():120327. PubMed ID: 37582418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian interpretation of the prefrontal P2 ERP component based on stimulus/response mapping uncertainty.
    Aydin M; Lucia S; Casella A; Di Bello B; Di Russo F
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2024 May; 199():112337. PubMed ID: 38537889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. State anxiety alters the neural oscillatory correlates of predictions and prediction errors during reward-based learning.
    Hein TP; Herrojo Ruiz M
    Neuroimage; 2022 Apr; 249():118895. PubMed ID: 35017125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EEG mismatch responses in a multimodal roving stimulus paradigm provide evidence for probabilistic inference across audition, somatosensation, and vision.
    Grundei M; Schröder P; Gijsen S; Blankenburg F
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Jun; 44(9):3644-3668. PubMed ID: 37067073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dopaminergic basis for signaling belief updates, but not surprise, and the link to paranoia.
    Nour MM; Dahoun T; Schwartenbeck P; Adams RA; FitzGerald THB; Coello C; Wall MB; Dolan RJ; Howes OD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Oct; 115(43):E10167-E10176. PubMed ID: 30297411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Updating sensory versus task representations during task-switching: insights from cognitive brain potentials in humans.
    Periáñez JA; Barceló F
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):1160-72. PubMed ID: 19350711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.