These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3735507)

  • 1. Patient survival and local recurrence rate following radical prostatectomy for prostatic carcinoma.
    Middleton RG; Smith JA; Melzer RB; Hamilton PE
    J Urol; 1986 Aug; 136(2):422-4. PubMed ID: 3735507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radical prostatectomy for stage B2 prostatic cancer.
    Middleton RG; Smith JA
    J Urol; 1982 Apr; 127(4):702-3. PubMed ID: 7069834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Early results following radical prostatectomy in patients with capsule invasion, seminal vesicle infiltration and micrometastases].
    Terhorst B; Friedrichs R
    Urologe A; 1990 Mar; 29(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 2330669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Radical retropubic prostatectomy].
    Katz R; Shapiro A; Meretyk S; Landau EH; Pode D
    Harefuah; 1997 Aug; 133(3-4):87-91, 168. PubMed ID: 9332069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cancer control following anatomical radical prostatectomy: an interim report.
    Morton RA; Steiner MS; Walsh PC
    J Urol; 1991 Jun; 145(6):1197-200. PubMed ID: 1709704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of microinvasion of the capsule and/or micrometastasis of regional lymph nodes on disease free survival after radical prostatectomy.
    Hering F; Schmid HP; Graber P
    Ann Urol (Paris); 1994; 28(4):196-201. PubMed ID: 7979209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The presence of extracapsular extension is associated with an increased risk of death from prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy for patients with seminal vesicle invasion and negative lymph nodes.
    Mikel Hubanks J; Boorjian SA; Frank I; Gettman MT; Houston Thompson R; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Jeffrey Karnes R
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):26.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23395235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nondissection of pelvic lymph nodes does not influence the results of perineal radical prostatectomy in selected patients.
    Salomon L; Hoznek A; Lefrère-Belda MA; Bellot J; Chopin DK; Abbou CC
    Eur Urol; 2000 Mar; 37(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 10720855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the perineal approach increases the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions.
    Boccon-Gibod L; Ravery V; Vordos D; Toublanc M; Delmas V; Boccon-Gibod L
    J Urol; 1998 Oct; 160(4):1383-5. PubMed ID: 9751359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cancer control and quality of life following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: results at 10 years.
    Walsh PC; Partin AW; Epstein JI
    J Urol; 1994 Nov; 152(5 Pt 2):1831-6. PubMed ID: 7523730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radical prostatectomy and adjuvant radioactive gold seed placement: results of treatment at 5 and 10 years for clinical stages A2, B1 and B2 cancer of the prostate.
    Kwon ED; Loening SA; Hawtrey CE
    J Urol; 1991 Mar; 145(3):524-31. PubMed ID: 1997703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cancer-specific survival and predictors of prostate-specific antigen recurrence and survival in patients with seminal vesicle invasion after radical prostatectomy.
    Secin FP; Bianco FJ; Vickers AJ; Reuter V; Wheeler T; Fearn PA; Eastham JA; Scardino PT
    Cancer; 2006 Jun; 106(11):2369-75. PubMed ID: 16649221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radical perineal prostatectomy for clinical stage B2 carcinoma of the prostate.
    Elder JS; Jewett HJ; Walsh PC
    J Urol; 1982 Apr; 127(4):704-6. PubMed ID: 7069835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Results of 15 years of radical prostatectomy].
    Frohmüller H; Theiss M; Wirth M; Hofmockel G
    Urologe A; 1995 May; 34(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 7610518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: extraprostatic tumor extension and preservation of erectile function.
    Catalona WJ; Dresner SM
    J Urol; 1985 Dec; 134(6):1149-51. PubMed ID: 4057407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limited value of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens as a predictor of biochemical recurrence in Japanese men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Miyake H; Sakai I; Harada K; Eto H; Hara I
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 2005 Apr; 51(4):241-6. PubMed ID: 15912782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pitfalls in preoperative staging in prostate cancer.
    Mukamel E; Hanna J; deKernion JB
    Urology; 1987 Oct; 30(4):318-21. PubMed ID: 3660522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, laparoscopically assisted seminal vesicle mobilization, and total perineal prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Teichman JM; Reddy PK; Hulbert JC
    Urology; 1995 May; 45(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 7538244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radical prostatectomy. Patterns of local failure and survival in 67 patients.
    Schellhammer PF
    Urology; 1988 Mar; 31(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 3347967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 5-year tumor recurrence rates after anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
    Catalona WJ; Smith DS
    J Urol; 1994 Nov; 152(5 Pt 2):1837-42. PubMed ID: 7523731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.