These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37355726)
1. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene sequencing in the analysis of the human gut microbiome. Elie C; Perret M; Hage H; Sentausa E; Hesketh A; Louis K; Fritah-Lafont A; Leissner P; Vachon C; Rostaing H; Reynier F; Gervasi G; Saliou A Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):10279. PubMed ID: 37355726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Methods for the Extraction of Microbial DNA From Vaginal Swabs Used for Microbiome Studies. Mattei V; Murugesan S; Al Hashmi M; Mathew R; James N; Singh P; Kumar M; Lakshmanan AP; Terranegra A; Al Khodor S; Tomei S Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2019; 9():197. PubMed ID: 31245304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved DNA Extraction and Amplification Strategy for 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon-Based Microbiome Studies. Hong BY; Driscoll M; Gratalo D; Jarvie T; Weinstock GM Int J Mol Sci; 2024 Mar; 25(5):. PubMed ID: 38474213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization and Demonstration of Mock Communities as Control Reagents for Accurate Human Microbiome Community Measurements. Tourlousse DM; Narita K; Miura T; Ohashi A; Matsuda M; Ohyama Y; Shimamura M; Furukawa M; Kasahara K; Kameyama K; Saito S; Goto M; Shimizu R; Mishima R; Nakayama J; Hosomi K; Kunisawa J; Terauchi J; Sekiguchi Y; Kawasaki H Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Apr; 10(2):e0191521. PubMed ID: 35234490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Bead-Beating Intensity on the Genus- and Species-Level Characterization of the Gut Microbiome Using Amplicon and Complete 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing. Zhang B; Brock M; Arana C; Dende C; van Oers NS; Hooper LV; Raj P Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2021; 11():678522. PubMed ID: 34660333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Choice of DNA extraction method affects stool microbiome recovery and subsequent phenotypic association analyses. Fernández-Pato A; Sinha T; Gacesa R; Andreu-Sánchez S; Gois MFB; Gelderloos-Arends J; Jansen DBH; Kruk M; Jaeger M; Joosten LAB; Netea MG; Weersma RK; Wijmenga C; Harmsen HJM; Fu J; Zhernakova A; Kurilshikov A Sci Rep; 2024 Feb; 14(1):3911. PubMed ID: 38366085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of six DNA extraction protocols for 16S, ITS and shotgun metagenomic sequencing of microbial communities. Shaffer JP; Carpenter CS; Martino C; Salido RA; Minich JJ; Bryant M; Sanders K; Schwartz T; Humphrey G; Swafford AD; Knight R Biotechniques; 2022 Jun; 73(1):34-46. PubMed ID: 35713407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of metagenomic workflows using a newly constructed human gut microbiome mock community. Mori H; Kato T; Ozawa H; Sakamoto M; Murakami T; Taylor TD; Toyoda A; Ohkuma M; Kurokawa K; Ohno H DNA Res; 2023 Jun; 30(3):. PubMed ID: 37253538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling. Lim MY; Song EJ; Kim SH; Lee J; Nam YD Syst Appl Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 41(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 29305057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies. Yang F; Sun J; Luo H; Ren H; Zhou H; Lin Y; Han M; Chen B; Liao H; Brix S; Li J; Yang H; Kristiansen K; Zhong H Gigascience; 2020 Jul; 9(7):. PubMed ID: 32657325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are all faecal bacteria detected with equal efficiency? A study using next-generation sequencing and quantitative culture of infants' faecal samples. Sjöberg F; Nookaew I; Yazdanshenas S; Gio-Batta M; Adlerberth I; Wold AE J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Oct; 177():106018. PubMed ID: 32795633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces. Velásquez-Mejía EP; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Escobar JS Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 29079861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gut Microbiota Analysis Results Are Highly Dependent on the 16S rRNA Gene Target Region, Whereas the Impact of DNA Extraction Is Minor. Rintala A; Pietilä S; Munukka E; Eerola E; Pursiheimo JP; Laiho A; Pekkala S; Huovinen P J Biomol Tech; 2017 Apr; 28(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 28260999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Refinement of 16S rRNA gene analysis for low biomass biospecimens. Villette R; Autaa G; Hind S; Holm JB; Moreno-Sabater A; Larsen M Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10741. PubMed ID: 34031485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A low-cost pipeline for soil microbiome profiling. Bollmann-Giolai A; Giolai M; Heavens D; Macaulay I; Malone J; Clark MD Microbiologyopen; 2020 Dec; 9(12):e1133. PubMed ID: 33225533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of DNA Extraction Method on Variation in Human and Built Environment Microbial Community and Functional Profiles Assessed by Shotgun Metagenomics Sequencing. Sui HY; Weil AA; Nuwagira E; Qadri F; Ryan ET; Mezzari MP; Phipatanakul W; Lai PS Front Microbiol; 2020; 11():953. PubMed ID: 32528434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of fecal DNA extraction protocols for human gut microbiome studies. Lim MY; Park YS; Kim JH; Nam YD BMC Microbiol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):212. PubMed ID: 32680572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]