These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37356508)

  • 1. Comparing failure tests on pharmaceutical tablets: Interpretation using experimental results and a numerical approach with cohesive zone models.
    Mazel V; Girardot J; Kopp JB; Morel S; Tchoreloff P
    Int J Pharm; 2023 Jul; 642():123166. PubMed ID: 37356508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The bending strength of tablets with a breaking line--Comparison of the results of an elastic and a "brittle cracking" finite element model with experimental findings.
    Podczeck F; Newton JM; Fromme P
    Int J Pharm; 2015 Nov; 495(1):485-499. PubMed ID: 26363109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of different failure tests for pharmaceutical tablets: applicability of the Drucker-Prager failure criterion.
    Mazel V; Diarra H; Busignies V; Tchoreloff P
    Int J Pharm; 2014 Aug; 470(1-2):63-9. PubMed ID: 24810242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tensile strength and bonding in compacts: a comparison of diametral compression and three-point bending for plastically deforming materials.
    Amin MC; Fell JT
    Drug Dev Ind Pharm; 2002 Aug; 28(7):809-13. PubMed ID: 12236066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reevaluation of the diametral compression test for tablets using the flattened disc geometry.
    Mazel V; Guerard S; Croquelois B; Kopp JB; Girardot J; Diarra H; Busignies V; Tchoreloff P
    Int J Pharm; 2016 Nov; 513(1-2):669-677. PubMed ID: 27702696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Theoretical investigations into the influence of the position of a breaking line on the tensile failure of flat, round, bevel-edged tablets using finite element methodology (FEM) and its practical relevance for industrial tablet strength testing.
    Podczeck F; Newton JM; Fromme P
    Int J Pharm; 2014 Dec; 477(1-2):306-16. PubMed ID: 25455775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigations into the tensile failure of doubly-convex cylindrical tablets under diametral loading using finite element methodology.
    Podczeck F; Drake KR; Newton JM
    Int J Pharm; 2013 Sep; 454(1):412-24. PubMed ID: 23834836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of breaking tests for the characterization of the interfacial strength of bilayer tablets.
    Castrati L; Mazel V; Busignies V; Diarra H; Rossi A; Colombo P; Tchoreloff P
    Int J Pharm; 2016 Nov; 513(1-2):709-716. PubMed ID: 27717917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shear strength of pharmaceutical tablets: Theoretical considerations, evaluation and relation with the capping tendency of biconvex tablets.
    Mazel V; Diarra H; Busignies V; Tchoreloff P
    Int J Pharm; 2017 Oct; 532(1):421-426. PubMed ID: 28917989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Note on the Use of Diametrical Compression to Determine Tablet Tensile Strength.
    Hilden J; Polizzi M; Zettler A
    J Pharm Sci; 2017 Jan; 106(1):418-421. PubMed ID: 27686682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact testing as a new approach to determine mechanical strength of pharmaceutical tablets.
    Alhusban F; Murgatroyd EF
    Int J Pharm; 2024 Mar; 653():123891. PubMed ID: 38346603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Study of the validity of the three-point bending test for pharmaceutical round tablets using finite element method modeling.
    Mazel V; Diarra H; Busignies V; Tchoreloff P
    J Pharm Sci; 2014 Apr; 103(4):1305-8. PubMed ID: 24523243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predictive model for tensile strength of pharmaceutical tablets based on local hardness measurements.
    Juban A; Nouguier-Lehon C; Briancon S; Hoc T; Puel F
    Int J Pharm; 2015 Jul; 490(1-2):438-45. PubMed ID: 26043825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Indices for the brittleness of pharmaceutical tablets: A reassessment.
    Mazel V; Tchoreloff P
    Int J Pharm; 2023 Oct; 645():123364. PubMed ID: 37661031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tensile and shear methods for measuring strength of bilayer tablets.
    Chang SY; Li JX; Sun CC
    Int J Pharm; 2017 May; 523(1):121-126. PubMed ID: 28284920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of the mechanical properties of solid and cellular polymeric dosage forms by diametral compression.
    Blaesi AH; Saka N
    Int J Pharm; 2016 Jul; 509(1-2):444-453. PubMed ID: 27178343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Application of percolation model to the tensile strength and the reduced modulus of elasticity of three compacted pharmaceutical excipients.
    Busignies V; Leclerc B; Porion P; Evesque P; Couarraze G; Tchoreloff P
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2007 Sep; 67(2):507-14. PubMed ID: 17383863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new tablet brittleness index.
    Gong X; Sun CC
    Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2015 Jun; 93():260-6. PubMed ID: 25907006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breaking patterns of press-coated tablets during the diametral compression test: Influence of the product, geometry and process parameters.
    Picart L; Mazel V; Moulin A; Bourgeaux V; Tchoreloff P
    Int J Pharm; 2022 Jan; 612():121371. PubMed ID: 34902454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lamination of Pharmaceutical Tablets: Classification and Influence of Process Parameters.
    Mazel V; Tchoreloff P
    J Pharm Sci; 2022 May; 111(5):1480-1485. PubMed ID: 34699843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.