134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37356966)
1. Second opinion (external specialist referral) practice of breast pathology: the Nottingham experience.
Rakha EA; Adebayo LA; Abbas A; Hodi Z; Lee AHS; Ellis IO
Histopathology; 2023 Sep; 83(3):394-405. PubMed ID: 37356966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changes in breast cancer reports after pathology second opinion.
Marco V; Muntal T; García-Hernandez F; Cortes J; Gonzalez B; Rubio IT
Breast J; 2014; 20(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 24689830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic concordance of breast pathologists: lessons from the National Health Service Breast Screening Programme Pathology External Quality Assurance Scheme.
Rakha EA; Ahmed MA; Aleskandarany MA; Hodi Z; Lee AH; Pinder SE; Ellis IO
Histopathology; 2017 Mar; 70(4):632-642. PubMed ID: 28028831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Papillary carcinoma of the breast: diagnostic agreement and management implications.
Rakha EA; Ahmed MA; Ellis IO
Histopathology; 2016 Nov; 69(5):862-870. PubMed ID: 27270947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characteristics of a Breast Pathology Consultation Practice.
East EG; Zhao L; Pang JC; Jorns JM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2017 Apr; 141(4):578-584. PubMed ID: 28353380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study.
Elmore JG; Tosteson AN; Pepe MS; Longton GM; Nelson HD; Geller B; Carney PA; Onega T; Allison KH; Jackson SL; Weaver DL
BMJ; 2016 Jun; 353():i3069. PubMed ID: 27334105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast pathology second review identifies clinically significant discrepancies in over 10% of patients.
Khazai L; Middleton LP; Goktepe N; Liu BT; Sahin AA
J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 111(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 25273328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Second opinion oral pathology referrals in New Zealand.
Seo B; Hussaini HM; Rich AM
Pathology; 2017 Apr; 49(3):277-284. PubMed ID: 28274671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Importance of a second opinion in breast surgical pathology and therapeutic implications].
Salles Mde A; Sanches FS; Perez AA; Gobbi H
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2008 Dec; 30(12):602-8. PubMed ID: 19219341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Teledermatology for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.
Chuchu N; Dinnes J; Takwoingi Y; Matin RN; Bayliss SE; Davenport C; Moreau JF; Bassett O; Godfrey K; O'Sullivan C; Walter FM; Motley R; Deeks JJ; Williams HC;
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Dec; 12(12):CD013193. PubMed ID: 30521686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic challenges in papillary lesions of the breast.
Rakha EA; Ellis IO
Pathology; 2018 Jan; 50(1):100-110. PubMed ID: 29179906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Consultation in breast surgical pathology: interobserver diagnostic variability of atypical intraductal proliferative lesions].
Perez AA; Balabram D; Salles Mde A; Gobbi H
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 35(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 23752581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The value of a specialized second-opinion pathological diagnosis for oral and maxillofacial lesions.
Binmadi NO; Alhindi AA; Alsharif MT; Jamal BT; Mair YH
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):378. PubMed ID: 37296405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pattern and spectrum of morphology referrals in breast pathology consultation.
Jara-Lazaro AR; Tan PH
Pathology; 2008 Oct; 40(6):564-72. PubMed ID: 18752122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast pathology review: does it make a difference?
Romanoff AM; Cohen A; Schmidt H; Weltz CR; Jaffer SM; Nagi CS; Bleiweiss IJ; Port ER
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Oct; 21(11):3504-8. PubMed ID: 24859936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of routine expert breast pathology consultation and factors predicting discordant diagnosis.
Woeste MR; Jacob K; Duff MB; Donaldson M; Sanders MAG; McMasters KM; Ajkay N
Surg Oncol; 2022 Dec; 45():101860. PubMed ID: 36242980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characteristics associated with requests by pathologists for second opinions on breast biopsies.
Geller BM; Nelson HD; Weaver DL; Frederick PD; Allison KH; Onega T; Carney PA; Tosteson ANA; Elmore JG
J Clin Pathol; 2017 Nov; 70(11):947-953. PubMed ID: 28465449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inter-observer variability between general pathologists and a specialist in breast pathology in the diagnosis of lobular neoplasia, columnar cell lesions, atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Gomes DS; Porto SS; Balabram D; Gobbi H
Diagn Pathol; 2014 Jun; 9():121. PubMed ID: 24948027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Second Opinion Expert Pathology in Endometrial Cancer: Potential Clinical Implications.
Grevenkamp F; Kommoss F; Kommoss F; Lax S; Fend F; Wallwiener D; Schönfisch B; Krämer B; Brucker SY; Taran FA; Staebler A; Kommoss S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Feb; 27(2):289-296. PubMed ID: 27922981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast pathology practice: most common problems in a consultation service.
Putti TC; Pinder SE; Elston CW; Lee AH; Ellis IO
Histopathology; 2005 Nov; 47(5):445-57. PubMed ID: 16241992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
