149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37359380)
1. An effective hyper-parameter can increase the prediction accuracy in a single-step genetic evaluation.
Neshat M; Lee S; Momin MM; Truong B; van der Werf JHJ; Lee SH
Front Genet; 2023; 14():1104906. PubMed ID: 37359380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Making the most of all data: Combining non-genotyped and genotyped potato individuals with HBLUP.
Sood S; Lin Z; Caruana B; Slater AT; Daetwyler HD
Plant Genome; 2020 Nov; 13(3):e20056. PubMed ID: 33217206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-step genomic BLUP enables joint analysis of disconnected breeding programs: an example with Eucalyptus globulus Labill.
Callister AN; Bradshaw BP; Elms S; Gillies RAW; Sasse JM; Brawner JT
G3 (Bethesda); 2021 Sep; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34568915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Crossbreed evaluations in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor using adjusted realized relationship matrices.
Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Fragomeni BO; Chen CY; Herring WO; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):909-19. PubMed ID: 27065253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population.
Gao H; Christensen OF; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Zhang Y; Lund MS; Su G
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jul; 44(1):8. PubMed ID: 22455934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genomic evaluation of carcass traits of Korean beef cattle Hanwoo using a single-step marker effect model.
Koo Y; Alkhoder H; Choi TJ; Liu Z; Reents R
J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37004242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped.
Christensen OF; Lund MS
Genet Sel Evol; 2010 Jan; 42(1):2. PubMed ID: 20105297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving the accuracy of genomic prediction in Chinese Holstein cattle by using one-step blending.
Li X; Wang S; Huang J; Li L; Zhang Q; Ding X
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):66. PubMed ID: 25315995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implication of the order of blending and tuning when computing the genomic relationship matrix in single-step GBLUP.
McWhorter TM; Bermann M; Garcia ALS; Legarra A; Aguilar I; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 Jan; 140(1):60-78. PubMed ID: 35946919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.
Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9956-9970. PubMed ID: 31495630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending.
Su G; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Christensen OF; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):909-17. PubMed ID: 22281355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genomic Prediction Using Alternative Strategies of Weighted Single-Step Genomic BLUP for Yearling Weight and Carcass Traits in Hanwoo Beef Cattle.
Mehrban H; Naserkheil M; Lee DH; Cho C; Choi T; Park M; Ibáñez-Escriche N
Genes (Basel); 2021 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 33673102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genome-enabled prediction for tick resistance in Hereford and Braford beef cattle via reaction norm models.
Mota RR; Lopes PS; Tempelman RJ; Silva FF; Aguilar I; Gomes CC; Cardoso FF
J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):1834-43. PubMed ID: 27285681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genomic selection through single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction improves the accuracy of evaluation in Hanwoo cattle.
Park MN; Alam M; Kim S; Park B; Lee SH; Lee SS
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2020 Oct; 33(10):1544-1557. PubMed ID: 32054201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Genome-Enabled Prediction for Carcass Primal Cut Yields Using Single-Step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction in Hanwoo Cattle.
Naserkheil M; Mehrban H; Lee D; Park MN
Genes (Basel); 2021 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 34946834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genomic prediction using pooled data in a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction framework.
Baller JL; Kachman SD; Kuehn LA; Spangler ML
J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32497209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of alternative approaches to single-trait genomic prediction using genotyped and non-genotyped Hanwoo beef cattle.
Lee J; Cheng H; Garrick D; Golden B; Dekkers J; Park K; Lee D; Fernando R
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):2. PubMed ID: 28093065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
