These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
663 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3736079)
1. Late results after left-sided cardiac valve replacement in children. Milano A; Vouhé PR; Baillot-Vernant F; Donzeau-Gouge P; Trinquet F; Roux PM; Leca F; Neveux JY J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Aug; 92(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 3736079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Carpentier-Edwards standard porcine bioprosthesis. A first-generation tissue valve with excellent long-term clinical performance. Jamieson WR; Allen P; Miyagishima RT; Gerein AN; Munro AI; Burr LH; Tyers GF J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Mar; 99(3):543-61. PubMed ID: 2308373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Valve replacement in the elderly. Is the mechanical valve a good alternative? Antunes MJ J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Oct; 98(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 2796355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Late results after Starr-Edwards valve replacement in children. Schaff HV; Danielson GK; DiDonato RM; Puga FJ; Mair DD; McGoon DC J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Oct; 88(4):583-9. PubMed ID: 6482490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evolution of mitral valve replacement in children: a 40-year experience. Brown JW; Fiore AC; Ruzmetov M; Eltayeb O; Rodefeld MD; Turrentine MW Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Feb; 93(2):626-33; discussion 633. PubMed ID: 22153051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis. Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; Abel JG; Janusz MT; Lichtenstein SV; MacNab JS; Stanford EA; Chan F J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1109-15.e2. PubMed ID: 19379975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Heart valve replacement with the Sorin tilting-disc prosthesis. A 10-year experience. Milano A; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Mossuto E; Testolin L; Thiene G; Gallucci V J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Feb; 103(2):267-75. PubMed ID: 1735992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement: predictors of adverse outcome. Kuwaki K; Tsukamoto M; Komatsu K; Morishita K; Sakata J; Abe T J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 12701788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The St. Jude Medical bileaflet valve prosthesis. A 5 year experience. Chaux A; Czer LS; Matloff JM; DeRobertis MA; Stewart ME; Bateman TM; Kass RM; Lee ME; Gray RJ J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):706-17. PubMed ID: 6492839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term follow-up after mitral valve replacement in childhood: poor event-free survival in the young child. Beierlein W; Becker V; Yates R; Tsang V; Elliott M; de Leval M; van Doorn C Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 May; 31(5):860-5. PubMed ID: 17383889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement. Khan SS; Trento A; DeRobertis M; Kass RM; Sandhu M; Czer LS; Blanche C; Raissi S; Fontana GP; Cheng W; Chaux A; Matloff JM J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 11479498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results. Murakami T; Eishi K; Nakano S; Kobayashi J; Sasako Y; Isobe F; Kosakai Y; Kito Y; Kawashima Y J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early mechanical failures of the Hancock pericardial xenograft. Bortolotti U; Milano A; Thiene G; Guerra F; Mazzucco A; Valente M; Talenti E; Gallucci V J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug; 94(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 3613618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: time-related outcomes and risk factors. Alsoufi B; Al-Halees Z; Fadel B; Al-Wesabi A; Al-Ahmadi M; Joufan M; Siblini G; Canver CC J Heart Valve Dis; 2010 May; 19(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 20583397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population. Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Caprili L; Testolin L; Thiene G; Gerosa G J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Late results of heart valve replacement with the Hancock II bioprosthesis. David TE; Ivanov J; Armstrong S; Feindel CM; Cohen G J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Feb; 121(2):268-77. PubMed ID: 11174732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes? Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combined mitral and aortic valve replacement for rheumatic heart disease: fifteen-year follow up and long-term results. Panda BR; Shankar R; Kuruvilla KT; Philip MA; Thankachen R; Shukla V; Korula RJ J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Mar; 18(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 19455892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]