BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37360912)

  • 1. 280 characters to the White House: predicting 2020 U.S. presidential elections from twitter data.
    Rizk R; Rizk D; Rizk F; Hsu S
    Comput Math Organ Theory; 2023 Mar; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 37360912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election.
    Chen E; Deb A; Ferrara E
    J Comput Soc Sci; 2022; 5(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 33824934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A large-scale sentiment analysis of tweets pertaining to the 2020 US presidential election.
    Ali RH; Pinto G; Lawrie E; Linstead EJ
    J Big Data; 2022; 9(1):79. PubMed ID: 35729897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Indonesian presidential election sentiment: Dataset of response public before 2024.
    Firdaus AA; Yudhana A; Riadi I; Mahsun
    Data Brief; 2024 Feb; 52():109993. PubMed ID: 38226041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. From Twitter to Aso-Rock: A sentiment analysis framework for understanding Nigeria 2023 presidential election.
    Olabanjo O; Wusu A; Afisi O; Asokere M; Padonu R; Olabanjo O; Ojo O; Folorunso O; Aribisala B; Mazzara M
    Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e16085. PubMed ID: 37215756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Studying topic engagement and synergy among candidates for 2020 US Elections.
    Baxi MK; Sharma R; Mago V
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2022; 12(1):136. PubMed ID: 36118938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the frontiers of Twitter data and sentiment analysis in election prediction: a review.
    Alvi Q; Ali SF; Ahmed SB; Khan NA; Javed M; Nobanee H
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2023; 9():e1517. PubMed ID: 37705657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gender dynamics on Twitter during the 2020 U.S. Democratic presidential primary.
    King C; Carley KM
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2023; 13(1):50. PubMed ID: 36937492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Public interest in Cannabis during election season: a Google Trends analysis.
    Torgerson T; Roberts W; Lester D; Khojasteh J; Vassar M
    J Cannabis Res; 2020 Sep; 2(1):31. PubMed ID: 33526135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Grinberg N; Joseph K; Friedland L; Swire-Thompson B; Lazer D
    Science; 2019 Jan; 363(6425):374-378. PubMed ID: 30679368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual Differences in Belief in Fake News about Election Fraud after the 2020 U.S. Election.
    Calvillo DP; Rutchick AM; Garcia RJB
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2021 Dec; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 34940110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electoral College bias and the 2020 presidential election.
    Erikson RS; Sigman K; Yao L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Nov; 117(45):27940-27944. PubMed ID: 33106408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does Television Viewership Predict Presidential Election Outcomes?
    Barfar A; Padmanabhan B
    Big Data; 2015 Sep; 3(3):138-147. PubMed ID: 26487986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The footprint of campaign strategies in Farsi Twitter: A case for 2021 Iranian presidential election.
    Mohammadi S; Moradi P; Firouzabadi SM; Jafari G
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0270822. PubMed ID: 35900976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Life expectancy and voting patterns in the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
    Curtis LH; Hoffman MN; Califf RM; Hammill BG
    SSM Popul Health; 2021 Sep; 15():100840. PubMed ID: 34169139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election.
    Bovet A; Makse HA
    Nat Commun; 2019 Jan; 10(1):7. PubMed ID: 30602729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparative framework to analyze convergence on Twitter electoral conversations.
    Cárdenas-Sánchez D; Sampayo AM; Rodríguez-Prieto M; Feged-Rivadeneira A
    Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):19062. PubMed ID: 36352010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Social media's contribution to political misperceptions in U.S. Presidential elections.
    Garrett RK
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213500. PubMed ID: 30917154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. (Re)shaping online narratives: when bots promote the message of President Trump during his first impeachment.
    Galgoczy MC; Phatak A; Vinson D; Mago VK; Giabbanelli PJ
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2022; 8():e947. PubMed ID: 35494820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.