These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37360912)

  • 21. Reconstruction of the socio-semantic dynamics of political activist Twitter networks-Method and application to the 2017 French presidential election.
    Gaumont N; Panahi M; Chavalarias D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0201879. PubMed ID: 30231018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Online negative sentiment towards Mexicans and Hispanics and impact on mental well-being: A time-series analysis of social media data during the 2016 United States presidential election.
    Hswen Y; Qin Q; Williams DR; Viswanath K; Subramanian SV; Brownstein JS
    Heliyon; 2020 Sep; 6(9):e04910. PubMed ID: 33005781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Baseline comparative analysis and review of election forensics: Application to Ghana's 2012 and 2020 presidential elections.
    Agyemang EF; Nortey ENN; Minkah R; Asah-Asante K
    Heliyon; 2023 Aug; 9(8):e18276. PubMed ID: 37576298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Negativity, emotionality and populist rhetoric in election campaigns worldwide, and their effects on media attention and electoral success
    Gerstlé J; Nai A
    Eur J Commun; 2019 Aug; 34(4):410-444. PubMed ID: 31534293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Motivated reasoning: Election integrity beliefs, outcome acceptance, and polarization before, during, and after the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Vail KE; Harvell-Bowman L; Lockett M; Pyszczynski T; Gilmore G
    Motiv Emot; 2023; 47(2):177-192. PubMed ID: 36188156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methodology with bootstrap percentile estimates for predicting presidential election results in Ghana.
    Nortey EN; Ansah-Narh T; Asah-Asante R; Minkah R
    Springerplus; 2015; 4():525. PubMed ID: 26435890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. U.S. Foreign Policy on the Verge of a New Path.
    Prikhodko OV
    Her Russ Acad Sci; 2021; 91(6):667-676. PubMed ID: 35125840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis and mining of an election-based network using large-scale twitter data: a retrospective study.
    Chakraborty A; Mukherjee N
    Soc Netw Anal Min; 2023; 13(1):74. PubMed ID: 37122615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. County community health associations of net voting shift in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Wasfy JH; Stewart C; Bhambhani V
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185051. PubMed ID: 28968415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Another issue comes out: gay rights policy voting in recent U.S. presidential elections.
    Rhodebeck LA
    J Homosex; 2015; 62(6):701-34. PubMed ID: 25530286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Suspicious Minds: Unexpected Election Outcomes, Perceived Electoral Integrity and Satisfaction With Democracy in American Presidential Elections.
    Mongrain P
    Polit Res Q; 2023 Dec; 76(4):1589-1603. PubMed ID: 37916035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. First public dataset to study 2023 Turkish general election.
    Najafi A; Mugurtay N; Zouzou Y; Demirci E; Demirkiran S; Karadeniz HA; Varol O
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8794. PubMed ID: 38627434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries.
    Banai B; Laustsen L; Banai IP; Bovan K
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918758736. PubMed ID: 29911405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections.
    Flamino J; Galeazzi A; Feldman S; Macy MW; Cross B; Zhou Z; Serafino M; Bovet A; Makse HA; Szymanski BK
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Jun; 7(6):904-916. PubMed ID: 36914806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Was the 2020 Presidential Election Nerve-Wracking?: Changes in Mental Health Among College Dreamers.
    Wang SX; Goodman J; Laurenceau JP
    Dela J Public Health; 2023 Nov; 9(4):68-76. PubMed ID: 38173957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Twitter social bots: The 2019 Spanish general election data.
    Pastor-Galindo J; Zago M; Nespoli P; López Bernal S; Huertas Celdrán A; Gil Pérez M; Ruipérez-Valiente JA; Martínez Pérez G; Gómez Mármol F
    Data Brief; 2020 Oct; 32():106047. PubMed ID: 32775565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An iterative topic model filtering framework for short and noisy user-generated data: analyzing conspiracy theories on twitter.
    Kant G; Wiebelt L; Weisser C; Kis-Katos K; Luber M; Säfken B
    Int J Data Sci Anal; 2022 May; ():1-21. PubMed ID: 35542313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using Facebook data to predict the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Chang KC; Chiang CF; Lin MJ
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0253560. PubMed ID: 34851951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimizing sentiment analysis of Nigerian 2023 presidential election using two-stage residual long short term memory.
    Oyewola DO; Oladimeji LA; Julius SO; Kachalla LB; Dada EG
    Heliyon; 2023 Apr; 9(4):e14836. PubMed ID: 37082632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Election-Related Post-Traumatic Stress: Evidence from the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.
    Fraser T; Panagopoulos C; Smith K
    Politics Life Sci; 2023 Nov; 42(2):179-204. PubMed ID: 37987568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.