These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37361026)

  • 1. AGREEMENT OF HIP KINEMATICS BETWEEN TWO TRACKING MARKER CONFIGURATIONS USED WITH THE CODA PELVIS DURING ERGONOMIC ROOFING TASKS.
    Moore KD; Hawke AL; Carey RE; Wu JZ; Breloff SP
    J Mech Med Biol; 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 37361026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of different pelvic technical marker sets upon hip kinematics during gait.
    Langley B; Page R; Greig M
    Gait Posture; 2019 Jun; 71():74-78. PubMed ID: 31015185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of a lateral pelvic cluster technical system in evaluating running kinematics.
    Liew BXW; Morris S; Robinson MA; Netto K
    J Biomech; 2016 Jun; 49(9):1989-1993. PubMed ID: 27207384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of a method to accurately correct anterior superior iliac spine marker occlusion.
    Hoffman JT; McNally MP; Wordeman SC; Hewett TE
    J Biomech; 2015 Apr; 48(6):1224-8. PubMed ID: 25704531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-validation of marker configurations to measure pelvic kinematics in gait.
    Vogt L; Portscher M; Brettmann K; Pfeifer K; Banzer W
    Gait Posture; 2003 Dec; 18(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 14667951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of thigh and shank marker quantity on lower extremity kinematics using a constrained model.
    Slater AA; Hullfish TJ; Baxter JR
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Nov; 19(1):399. PubMed ID: 30424811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of 15 different pelvis marker protocols during sit-to-stand.
    Hansen J; Pedersen AR; Sørensen H; Nielsen JF
    J Biomech; 2022 Jan; 130():110875. PubMed ID: 34871893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How Different Marker Sets Affect Joint Angles in Inverse Kinematics Framework.
    Mantovani G; Lamontagne M
    J Biomech Eng; 2017 Apr; 139(4):. PubMed ID: 27636354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An alternative whole-body marker set to accurately and reliably quantify joint kinematics during load carriage.
    Lenton GK; Doyle TLA; Saxby DJ; Lloyd DG
    Gait Posture; 2017 May; 54():318-324. PubMed ID: 28411551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utility of 2D Video Analysis for Assessing Frontal Plane Trunk and Pelvis Motion during Stepping, Landing, and Change in Direction Tasks: A Validity Study.
    Straub RK; Powers CM
    Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2022; 17(2):139-147. PubMed ID: 35136682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differences in Lower Extremity and Trunk Kinematics between Single Leg Squat and Step Down Tasks.
    Lewis CL; Foch E; Luko MM; Loverro KL; Khuu A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126258. PubMed ID: 25955321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Change the direction: 3D optimal control simulation by directly tracking marker and ground reaction force data.
    Nitschke M; Marzilger R; Leyendecker S; Eskofier BM; Koelewijn AD
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14852. PubMed ID: 36778146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reconstructing an accelerometer-based pelvis segment for three-dimensional kinematic analyses during laboratory simulated tasks with obstructed line-of-sight.
    Zehr JD; Tennant LM; Buchman-Pearle JM; Callaghan JP
    J Biomech; 2021 Jun; 123():110512. PubMed ID: 34015738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Static Ankle Dorsiflexion and Hip and Pelvis Kinematics During Forward Step-Down in Patients With Hip-Related Groin Pain.
    Foster SN; Harris MD; Hastings MK; Mueller MJ; Salsich GB; Harris-Hayes M
    J Sport Rehabil; 2020 Dec; 30(4):638-645. PubMed ID: 33291065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An Evaluation of Motion Trackers with Virtual Reality Sensor Technology in Comparison to a Marker-Based Motion Capture System Based on Joint Angles for Ergonomic Risk Assessment.
    Vox JP; Weber A; Wolf KI; Izdebski K; Schüler T; König P; Wallhoff F; Friemert D
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 May; 21(9):. PubMed ID: 34062827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of 2 methods of measuring spine angular kinematics during dynamic flexion movements: skin-mounted markers compared with markers affixed to rigid bodies.
    Howarth SJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2014; 37(9):688-95. PubMed ID: 25455835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. TWO-DIMENSIONAL VIDEO ANALYSIS IS COMPARABLE TO 3D MOTION CAPTURE IN LOWER EXTREMITY MOVEMENT ASSESSMENT.
    Schurr SA; Marshall AN; Resch JE; Saliba SA
    Int J Sports Phys Ther; 2017 Apr; 12(2):163-172. PubMed ID: 28515970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The efficacy of a video-based marker-less tracking system for gait analysis.
    Ong A; Harris IS; Hamill J
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Aug; 20(10):1089-1095. PubMed ID: 28569549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Influence of Kinematic Constraints on Model Performance During Inverse Kinematics Analysis of the Thoracolumbar Spine.
    Alemi MM; Burkhart KA; Lynch AC; Allaire BT; Mousavi SJ; Zhang C; Bouxsein ML; Anderson DE
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():688041. PubMed ID: 34395398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity of Using Automated Two-Dimensional Video Analysis to Measure Continuous Sagittal Plane Running Kinematics.
    Peebles AT; Carroll MM; Socha JJ; Schmitt D; Queen RM
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Jan; 49(1):455-468. PubMed ID: 32705424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.