183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37361565)
1. Assessing the decision quality of artificial intelligence and oncologists of different experience in different regions in breast cancer treatment.
Han C; Pan Y; Liu C; Yang X; Li J; Wang K; Sun Z; Liu H; Jin G; Fang F; Pan X; Tang T; Chen X; Pang S; Ma L; Wang X; Ren Y; Liu M; Liu F; Jiang M; Zhao J; Lu C; Lu Z; Gao D; Jiang Z; Pei J
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1152013. PubMed ID: 37361565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison between clinical decision support system and clinicians in breast cancer.
Li J; Yuan Y; Bian L; Lin Q; Yang H; Ma L; Xin L; Li F; Zhang S; Wang T; Liu Y; Jiang Z
Heliyon; 2023 May; 9(5):e16059. PubMed ID: 37215843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acceptance, Barriers, and Facilitators to Implementing Artificial Intelligence-Based Decision Support Systems in Emergency Departments: Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation.
Fujimori R; Liu K; Soeno S; Naraba H; Ogura K; Hara K; Sonoo T; Ogura T; Nakamura K; Goto T
JMIR Form Res; 2022 Jun; 6(6):e36501. PubMed ID: 35699995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artificial Intelligence Treatment Decision Support For Complex Breast Cancer Among Oncologists With Varying Expertise.
Xu F; Sepúlveda MJ; Jiang Z; Wang H; Li J; Yin Y; Liu Z; Roebuck MC; Shortliffe EH; Yan M; Song Y; Geng C; Tang J; Rhee K
JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2019 Aug; 3():1-15. PubMed ID: 31419181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of an Artificial Intelligence Clinical Decision Support System on Treatment Decisions for Complex Breast Cancer.
Xu F; Sepúlveda MJ; Jiang Z; Wang H; Li J; Liu Z; Yin Y; Roebuck MC; Shortliffe EH; Yan M; Song Y; Geng C; Tang J; Purcell Jackson G; Preininger AM; Rhee K
JCO Clin Cancer Inform; 2020 Sep; 4():824-838. PubMed ID: 32970484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Are physicians ready for precision antibiotic prescribing? A qualitative analysis of the acceptance of artificial intelligence-enabled clinical decision support systems in India and Singapore.
Huang Z; George MM; Tan YR; Natarajan K; Devasagayam E; Tay E; Manesh A; Varghese GM; Abraham OC; Zachariah A; Yap P; Lall D; Chow A
J Glob Antimicrob Resist; 2023 Dec; 35():76-85. PubMed ID: 37640155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The ethics of machine learning-based clinical decision support: an analysis through the lens of professionalisation theory.
Heyen NB; Salloch S
BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Aug; 22(1):112. PubMed ID: 34412649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "Many roads lead to Rome and the Artificial Intelligence only shows me one road": an interview study on physician attitudes regarding the implementation of computerised clinical decision support systems.
Van Cauwenberge D; Van Biesen W; Decruyenaere J; Leune T; Sterckx S
BMC Med Ethics; 2022 May; 23(1):50. PubMed ID: 35524301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physicians' Attitudes Towards the Advice of a Guideline-Based Decision Support System: A Case Study With OncoDoc2 in the Management of Breast Cancer Patients.
Bouaud J; Spano JP; Lefranc JP; Cojean-Zelek I; Blaszka-Jaulerry B; Zelek L; Durieux A; Tournigand C; Rousseau A; Vandenbussche PY; Séroussi B
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():264-9. PubMed ID: 26262052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Clinical Decision Support System for Sleep Staging Tasks With Explanations From Artificial Intelligence: User-Centered Design and Evaluation Study.
Hwang J; Lee T; Lee H; Byun S
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):e28659. PubMed ID: 35044311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of clinical decision support systems on emergency medicine physicians' decision-making: A pilot scenario-based simulation study.
Assadi A; Laussen PC; Freire G; Ghassemi M; Trbovich PC
Front Pediatr; 2022; 10():1047202. PubMed ID: 36589162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Decision support systems in clinical practice: The case of venous thromboembolism prevention.
Nazarenko GI; Kleymenova EB; Payushik SA; Otdelenov VA; Sychev DA; Yashina LP
Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27 Suppl 1():S104-5. PubMed ID: 26639683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Watson for Oncology and breast cancer treatment recommendations: agreement with an expert multidisciplinary tumor board.
Somashekhar SP; Sepúlveda MJ; Puglielli S; Norden AD; Shortliffe EH; Rohit Kumar C; Rauthan A; Arun Kumar N; Patil P; Rhee K; Ramya Y
Ann Oncol; 2018 Feb; 29(2):418-423. PubMed ID: 29324970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical decision support improves physician guideline adherence for laboratory monitoring of chronic kidney disease: a matched cohort study.
Ennis J; Gillen D; Rubenstein A; Worcester E; Brecher ME; Asplin J; Coe F
BMC Nephrol; 2015 Oct; 16():163. PubMed ID: 26471846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of heart failure.
Choi DJ; Park JJ; Ali T; Lee S
NPJ Digit Med; 2020; 3():54. PubMed ID: 32285014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. GC-CDSS: Personalized gastric cancer treatment recommendations system based on knowledge graph.
Li S; Li Z; Xue K; Zhou X; Ding C; Shao Y; Zhang S; Ruan T; Zheng M; Sun J
Int J Med Inform; 2024 May; 185():105402. PubMed ID: 38467099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increasing clinical medical service satisfaction: An investigation into the impacts of Physicians' use of clinical decision-making support AI on patients' service satisfaction.
Sun K; Zheng X; Liu W
Int J Med Inform; 2023 Aug; 176():105107. PubMed ID: 37257235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The West German Study Group Breast Cancer Intrinsic Subtype study: a prospective multicenter decision impact study utilizing the Prosigna assay for adjuvant treatment decision-making in estrogen-receptor-positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer.
Wuerstlein R; Sotlar K; Gluz O; Otremba B; von Schumann R; Witzel I; Schindlbeck C; Janni W; Schem C; Bauerfeind I; Hasmueller S; Tesch H; Paulenz A; Ghali N; Orujov E; Kates RE; Cowens W; Hornberger J; Pelz E; Harbeck N
Curr Med Res Opin; 2016 Jul; 32(7):1217-24. PubMed ID: 26971372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of a Machine Learning-Based Decision Support System for Urinary Tract Infections: Prospective Observational Study in 36 Primary Care Practices.
Herter WE; Khuc J; Cinà G; Knottnerus BJ; Numans ME; Wiewel MA; Bonten TN; de Bruin DP; van Esch T; Chavannes NH; Verheij RA
JMIR Med Inform; 2022 May; 10(5):e27795. PubMed ID: 35507396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Support System for the most evidence-based approach to managing perioperative anticoagulation.
Buchner LM; Park EJ; Bendz P; Englert A; von der Groeben C; Vo L; Schmitt E; Zacharowski K; Börm P; Stauber D; Bingold T; Booke M; Gerth M; Greim CA; Mersmann J; Muellenbach RM; Mutlak H; Ott B; Pape A; Sander M; Teßmann R; Welte M; Wermelt J; Wulf H; Choorapoikayil S; Füllenbach C; Meybohm P
J Clin Anesth; 2022 Sep; 80():110877. PubMed ID: 35576879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]