These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37364537)

  • 1. Reassessing lead protective garment assessment using ICRP 103 tissue weighting factors.
    Brewer JM; Hammerstrom K; Bjarnason TA
    J Radiol Prot; 2023 Jul; 43(3):. PubMed ID: 37364537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
    Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-662. PubMed ID: 28102605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Application of the diagnostic radiological index of protection to protective garments.
    Pasciak AS; Jones AK; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):653-62. PubMed ID: 25771561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of using scatter-mimicking beams instead of standard beams to measure penetration when assessing the protective value of radiation-protective garments.
    Jones AK; Pasciak AS; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 45(3):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 29314058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the (f)utility of measuring the lead equivalence of protective garments.
    Jones AK; Wagner LK
    Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):063902. PubMed ID: 23718618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shielding effectiveness of X-ray protective garment.
    Eder H; Schlattl H
    Phys Med; 2021 Feb; 82():343-350. PubMed ID: 33765649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Organ-specific external dose coefficients and protective apron transmission factors for historical dose reconstruction for medical personnel.
    Simon SL
    Health Phys; 2011 Jul; 101(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 21617389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effective dose estimation in diagnostic radiology with two dosimeters: impact of the 2007 recommendations of the ICRP.
    von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
    Health Phys; 2008 Sep; 95(3):337-40. PubMed ID: 18695415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Not all lightweight lead aprons and thyroid shields are alike.
    Fakhoury E; Provencher JA; Subramaniam R; Finlay DJ
    J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 70(1):246-250. PubMed ID: 30292602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo simulation of the dose to nuclear medicine staff wearing protective garments.
    Fog LS; Collins P
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2008 Dec; 31(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 19239057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the occupational doses of interventional radiologists.
    Kuipers G; Velders XL; de Winter RJ; Reekers JA; Piek JJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2008; 31(3):483-9. PubMed ID: 18266030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative Dosimetry for
    Josefsson A; Hobbs RF; Ranka S; Schwarz BC; Plyku D; Willegaignon de Amorim de Carvalho J; Buchpiguel CA; Sapienza MT; Bolch WE; Sgouros G
    J Nucl Med; 2018 Aug; 59(8):1281-1288. PubMed ID: 29439017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Should We Keep the Lead in the Aprons?
    Bartal G; Sailer AM; Vano E
    Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Mar; 21(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 29471995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of the radiation protective apron on the response of active and passive personal dosemeters used in interventional radiology and cardiology.
    Ginjaume M; Carinou E; Brodecki M; Clairand I; Domienik-Andrzejewska J; Exner L; Ferrari P; Jovanović Z; Krstic D; Principi S; Van Hoey O; Vanhavere F
    J Radiol Prot; 2019 Mar; 39(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 30523896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Evaluation of Protective Garments with Respect to Garment Characteristics and Manufacturer Label Information.
    Lichliter A; Weir V; Heithaus RE; Gipson S; Syed A; West J; Rees C
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):148-155. PubMed ID: 27789076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptions on radioprotective garment usage and underlying reasons for non-adherence among medical radiation workers from public hospitals in a middle-income Asian setting: A qualitative exploration.
    Mohd Ridzwan SF; Bhoo-Pathy N; Isahak M; Wee LH
    Heliyon; 2019 Sep; 5(9):e02478. PubMed ID: 31687573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cardiac catheterization: impact of face and neck shielding on new estimates of effective dose.
    von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
    Health Phys; 2009 Dec; 97(6):622-7. PubMed ID: 19901597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An analytic approach to double dosimetry algorithms in occupational dosimetry using energy dependent organ dose conversion coefficients.
    von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
    Health Phys; 2010 Dec; 99(6):800-5. PubMed ID: 21068598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.