These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37365774)

  • 1. Questionnaire survey regarding current status of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer in Japan: A cross-sectional survey for JSGOE members.
    Toyoshima M; Kobayashi E; Terai Y; Yamashita T; Terao Y; Nomura H; Asada H; Hoshiba T; Mikami M; Mandai M; Wada-Hiraike O; Akira S; Osuga Y; Fujii T;
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Sep; 49(9):2370-2378. PubMed ID: 37365774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoperative tumor spill during minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: A survey study on experience and practice.
    Chang EJ; Jooya ND; Ciesielski KM; Shahzad MM; Roman LD; Matsuo K
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Dec; 267():256-261. PubMed ID: 34837855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variability between individual surgeons in route of hysterectomy for patients with endometrial cancer in Florida.
    Carrubba AR; Osagiede O; Spaulding AC; Cochuyt JJ; Hodge DO; Robertson MW; DeStephano CC
    Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 31():55-60. PubMed ID: 31539642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trend and characteristics of minimally invasive surgery for patients with endometrial cancer in Japan.
    Yoshida H; Machida H; Matsuo K; Terai Y; Fujii T; Mandai M; Kawana K; Kobayashi H; Mikami M; Nagase S
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2023 May; 34(3):e56. PubMed ID: 36929580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is there a need for a technical certification system for gynecological robotic surgery? Questionnaire survey of members of the Japan Society of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endoscopy and Minimally Invasive Therapy.
    Komatsu H; Hiraike O; Fukuhara R; Yokoyama Y; Takahashi N; Nishi H; Baba T; Fujii T; Kitawaki J; Kobayashi H; Mandai M;
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Jun; 17(3):1125-1131. PubMed ID: 36617623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: An Updated Survey of Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
    Conrad LB; Ramirez PT; Burke W; Naumann RW; Ring KL; Munsell MF; Frumovitz M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jul; 25(6):1121-7. PubMed ID: 25860841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Less is more: clinical utility of postoperative laboratory testing following minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer.
    Lightfoot MDS; Felix AS; Calo CA; Hosmer-Quint JT; Taylor KL; Brown MB; Salani R; Copeland LJ; O'Malley DM; Bixel KL; Cohn DE; Fowler JM; Backes FJ; Cosgrove CM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 228(1):59.e1-59.e13. PubMed ID: 35931127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally invasive hysterectomy surgery rates for endometrial cancer performed at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Centers.
    Bergstrom J; Aloisi A; Armbruster S; Yen TT; Casarin J; Leitao MM; Tanner EJ; Matsuno R; Machado KK; Dowdy SC; Soliman PT; Wethington SL; Stone RL; Levinson KL; Fader AN
    Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Mar; 148(3):480-484. PubMed ID: 29338923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of uterine manipulators in minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Meng Y; Liu Y; Lin S; Cao C; Wu P; Gao P; Zhi W; Peng T; Gui L; Wu P
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1225-1232. PubMed ID: 32360066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, single-port and percutaneous hysterectomy: Comparison of perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive approaches in gynecologic surgery.
    Rossitto C; Cianci S; Gueli Alletti S; Perrone E; Pizzacalla S; Scambia G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Sep; 216():125-129. PubMed ID: 28753500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Status of surgical treatment procedures for endometrial cancer in Japan: results of a Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group survey.
    Watanabe Y; Aoki D; Kitagawa R; Takeuchi S; Sagae S; Sakuragi N; Yaegashi N;
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 May; 105(2):325-8. PubMed ID: 17267025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use and outcomes of minimally invasive hysterectomy for women with nonendometrioid endometrial cancers.
    Nieto VL; Huang Y; Hou JY; Tergas AI; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL; Wright JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):463.e1-463.e12. PubMed ID: 30086293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally Invasive Surgery Rate as a Quality Metric for Endometrial Cancer.
    Polan RM; Tanner EJ; Barber EL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1389-1394. PubMed ID: 31655129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Same-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Surgery Performed by Gynecologic Oncologists: A Review of Patient Selection.
    Sanabria D; Rodriguez J; Pecci P; Ardila E; Pareja R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):816-825. PubMed ID: 31715304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perspectives of Gynecologic Oncologists on Minimally Invasive Surgery During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Turkish Society of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Oncology (MIJOD) Survey.
    Dogan NU; Bilir E; Taskin S; Vatansever D; Dogan S; Taskiran C; Celik H; Ortac F; Gungor M
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2022 Feb; 23(2):573-581. PubMed ID: 35225470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does Surgical Teaching Take Time? Resident Participation in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer.
    Freeman AH; Barrie A; Lyon L; Conell C; Garcia C; Littell RD; Powell CB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):783-789. PubMed ID: 28336363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
    Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?
    Monterossi G; Ghezzi F; Vizza E; Zannoni GF; Uccella S; Corrado G; Restaino S; Quagliozzi L; Casarin J; Dinoi G; Scambia G; Fanfani F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28065812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nationwide trends in and regional factors associated with minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications in Japan.
    Isoyama K; Matsuura M; Hayasaka M; Nagao S; Nishimura Y; Yoshioka T; Imai Y; Miyagi E; Suzuki Y; Saito T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Oct; 289():129-135. PubMed ID: 37660507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oncologic outcomes for patients with endometrial cancer who received minimally invasive surgery: a retrospective observational study.
    Tanaka T; Ueda S; Miyamoto S; Terada S; Konishi H; Kogata Y; Fujiwara S; Tanaka Y; Taniguchi K; Komura K; Ohmichi M
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Nov; 25(11):1985-1994. PubMed ID: 32648131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.