BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37366040)

  • 21. Updated 2013 College of American Pathologists/American Society of Clinical Oncology (CAP/ASCO) guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) testing increase HER2 positive and HER2 equivocal breast cancer cases; retrospective study of HER2 FISH results of 836 invasive breast cancers.
    Singh K; Tantravahi U; Lomme MM; Pasquariello T; Steinhoff M; Sung CJ
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jun; 157(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 27180259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of the updated 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 FISH testing in invasive breast cancer: a retrospective study of HER2 fish results of 2233 cases.
    Liu ZH; Wang K; Lin DY; Xu J; Chen J; Long XY; Ge Y; Luo XL; Zhang KP; Liu YH; Xu FP
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 May; 175(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 30712197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison between digital image analysis and visual assessment of immunohistochemical HER2 expression in breast cancer.
    Jakobsen MR; Teerapakpinyo C; Shuangshoti S; Keelawat S
    Pathol Res Pract; 2018 Dec; 214(12):2087-2092. PubMed ID: 30377025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implications of the Updated 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Gene Testing Using Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for Breast Cancer.
    Lim TH; Lim AS; Thike AA; Tien SL; Tan PH
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2016 Feb; 140(2):140-7. PubMed ID: 26910218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and dual-ISH (DISH) in the determination of HER2 status in breast cancer.
    Mansfield AS; Sukov WR; Eckel-Passow JE; Sakai Y; Walsh FJ; Lonzo M; Wiktor AE; Dogan A; Jenkins RB
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Feb; 139(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 23355198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. UK recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer: an update.
    Rakha EA; Tan PH; Quinn C; Provenzano E; Shaaban AM; Deb R; Callagy G; Starczynski J; Lee AHS; Ellis IO; Pinder SE
    J Clin Pathol; 2023 Apr; 76(4):217-227. PubMed ID: 36564170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Delineation of HER2 gene status in breast carcinoma by silver in situ hybridization is reproducible among laboratories and pathologists.
    Carbone A; Botti G; Gloghini A; Simone G; Truini M; Curcio MP; Gasparini P; Mangia A; Perin T; Salvi S; Testi A; Verderio P
    J Mol Diagn; 2008 Nov; 10(6):527-36. PubMed ID: 18832456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of fluorescence in-situ hybridisation with dual-colour in-situ hybridisation for assessment of HER2 gene amplification of breast cancer in Hong Kong.
    Tang SM; Soong IS; Luk MY; Suen DT; Hioe F; Man EP; Tsun OK; Khoo US
    Hong Kong Med J; 2016 Apr; 22(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 26823385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Analytical validation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 immunohistochemistry by the use of the A0485 antibody versus the 4B5 antibody and breast versus gastric scoring guidelines in ovarian clear cell carcinoma.
    Lin SY; Wang YH; Hsu CY; Chen YJ; Lai CR; Hang JF
    Histopathology; 2021 Nov; 79(5):758-767. PubMed ID: 34036622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multi-institutional Assessment of Pathologist Scoring HER2 Immunohistochemistry.
    Robbins CJ; Fernandez AI; Han G; Wong S; Harigopal M; Podoll M; Singh K; Ly A; Kuba MG; Wen H; Sanders MA; Brock J; Wei S; Fadare O; Hanley K; Jorns J; Snir OL; Yoon E; Rabe K; Soong TR; Reisenbichler ES; Rimm DL
    Mod Pathol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):100032. PubMed ID: 36788069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. HER2 status determination using RNA-ISH--a rapid and simple technique showing high correlation with FISH and IHC in 141 cases of breast cancer.
    Alba J; Gutierrez J; Coupe VM; Fernández B; Vázquez-Boquete Á; Alba J; Forteza J; García-Caballero T
    Histol Histopathol; 2012 Aug; 27(8):1021-7. PubMed ID: 22763874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessment of ERBB2/HER2 Status in HER2-Equivocal Breast Cancers by FISH and 2013/2014 ASCO-CAP Guidelines.
    Press MF; Seoane JA; Curtis C; Quinaux E; Guzman R; Sauter G; Eiermann W; Mackey JR; Robert N; Pienkowski T; Crown J; Martin M; Valero V; Bee V; Ma Y; Villalobos I; Slamon DJ
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 Mar; 5(3):366-375. PubMed ID: 30520947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of Modified 2013 ASCO/CAP Guidelines on HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer. One Year Experience.
    Varga Z; Noske A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140652. PubMed ID: 26473483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Breast cancers with a HER2/CEP17 ratio of 2.0 or greater and an average HER2 copy number of less than 4.0 per cell: frequency, immunohistochemical correlation, and clinicopathological features.
    Zare SY; Lin L; Alghamdi AG; Daehne S; Roma AA; Hasteh F; Dell'Aquila M; Fadare O
    Hum Pathol; 2019 Jan; 83():7-13. PubMed ID: 30121371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. HER2 Gene Amplification Testing by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH): Comparison of the ASCO-College of American Pathologists Guidelines With FISH Scores Used for Enrollment in Breast Cancer International Research Group Clinical Trials.
    Press MF; Sauter G; Buyse M; Fourmanoir H; Quinaux E; Tsao-Wei DD; Eiermann W; Robert N; Pienkowski T; Crown J; Martin M; Valero V; Mackey JR; Bee V; Ma Y; Villalobos I; Campeau A; Mirlacher M; Lindsay MA; Slamon DJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2016 Oct; 34(29):3518-3528. PubMed ID: 27573653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization interpretation in invasive breast cancers with immunohistochemically equivocal results.
    Wang B; Ding W; Sun K; Wang X; Xu L; Teng X
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16726. PubMed ID: 31723206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The spectrum of HER2 expression in breast cancer: linking immunohistochemistry quantification with in situ hybridization assay.
    Polónia A; Canelas C; Caramelo A
    Virchows Arch; 2022 Jun; 480(6):1171-1179. PubMed ID: 35137279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. HER2 double-equivocal breast cancer in Chinese patients: a high concordance of HER2 status between different blocks from the same tumor.
    Liu Y; Wu S; Shi X; Luo Y; Pang J; Wang C; Mao F; Liang Z; Zeng X
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Nov; 178(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 31388934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clinical and Pathologic Features Associated With Invasive Breast Carcinoma With 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists In Situ Hybridization Group 2 Results (Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 [HER2]/Chromosome 17 Centromere [CEP17] Ratio ≥2.0 and Average HER2 Copy Number <4.0).
    Hoda RS; Zarei S; McIntire PJ; Sprague C; Mekhail Y; Carlson DL; Komforti MK; Downs-Kelly EP
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Jun; 146(6):701-709. PubMed ID: 34559875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation of a new classifier for the automated analysis of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene amplification in breast cancer specimens.
    Furrer D; Jacob S; Caron C; Sanschagrin F; Provencher L; Diorio C
    Diagn Pathol; 2013 Feb; 8():17. PubMed ID: 23379971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.