164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37366107)
1. Approaches for the setting of occupational exposure limits (OELs) for carcinogens.
Högberg J; Järnberg J
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2023 Dec; 53(3):131-167. PubMed ID: 37366107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strategy of the scientific committee on occupational exposure limits (SCOEL) in the derivation of occupational exposure limits for carcinogens and mutagens.
Bolt HM; Huici-Montagud A
Arch Toxicol; 2008 Jan; 82(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 18008062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of the benchmark-dose (BMD) approach to derive occupational exposure limits (OELs) for genotoxic carcinogens: N-nitrosamines.
Blum K; FitzGerald R; Wilks MF; Barle EL; Hopf NB
J Appl Toxicol; 2023 Aug; 43(8):1183-1200. PubMed ID: 36840679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Approaches for the development of occupational exposure limits for man-made mineral fibres (MMMFs).
Ziegler-Skylakakis K
Mutat Res; 2004 Sep; 553(1-2):37-41. PubMed ID: 15288531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Threshold and non-threshold chemical carcinogens: A survey of the present regulatory landscape.
Bevan RJ; Harrison PTC
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 88():291-302. PubMed ID: 28119000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Derivation of occupational exposure limits: Differences in methods and protection levels.
Schneider K; Dilger M; Drossard C; Ott H; Kaiser E
J Appl Toxicol; 2022 May; 42(5):913-926. PubMed ID: 35188277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Industry Derived Occupational Exposure Limits: A Survey of Professionals on the Dutch System of Exposure Guidelines.
Schenk L; Visser MJ; Palmen NGM
Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Nov; 63(9):1004-1012. PubMed ID: 31504142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of REACH-derived no-effect levels for workers with EU indicative occupational exposure limit values and national limit values in Finland.
Tynkkynen S; Santonen T; Stockmann-Juvala H
Ann Occup Hyg; 2015 May; 59(4):401-15. PubMed ID: 25638729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparative study on occupational exposure limits of chemical substances in workplace between GBZ 2.1 in China and ACGIH in USA].
Li W; Zhang M; Wang D
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2014 Jan; 32(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 24428986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of a framework for the selection of an appropriate occupational exposure limit for manganese.
Deveau M; Maier A; Krewski D
Neurotoxicology; 2017 Jan; 58():249-256. PubMed ID: 27663849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Will worker DNELs derived under the European REACH regulation extend the landscape of occupational exposure guidance values?
Schenk L; Johanson G
Arch Toxicol; 2019 May; 93(5):1187-1200. PubMed ID: 30993379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific criteria used for the development of occupational exposure limits for metals and other mining-related chemicals.
Haber LT; Maier A
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Dec; 36(3):262-79. PubMed ID: 12473411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Global Landscape of Occupational Exposure Limits--Implementation of Harmonization Principles to Guide Limit Selection.
Deveau M; Chen CP; Johanson G; Krewski D; Maier A; Niven KJ; Ripple S; Schulte PA; Silk J; Urbanus JH; Zalk DM; Niemeier RW
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12 Suppl 1(sup1):S127-44. PubMed ID: 26099071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Background, approaches and recent trends for setting health-based occupational exposure limits: a minireview.
Nielsen GD; Ovrebø S
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Aug; 51(3):253-69. PubMed ID: 18502550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A scoping survey of attitudes towards occupational exposure limits and REACH derived no effect levels for workers among chemical risk managers at Swedish workplaces.
Schenk L
Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2020 Sep; 33(5):611-620. PubMed ID: 32699425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An interdisciplinary framework for derivation of occupational exposure limits.
Maurer LL; Alexander MS; Bachman AN; Grimm FA; Lewis RJ; North CM; Wojcik NC; Goyak KO
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():1038305. PubMed ID: 36530659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A quantitative comparison of the safety margins in the european indicative occupational exposure limits and the derived no-effect levels for workers under REACH.
Schenk L; Johanson G
Toxicol Sci; 2011 Jun; 121(2):408-16. PubMed ID: 21389111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in China.
Liang Y; Wong O; Yang L; Li T; Su Z
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 16624464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The development and regulation of occupational exposure limits in Japan.
Takahashi K; Higashi T
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Nov; 46(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 16510222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative property-property relationships for computing occupational exposure limits and vapour hazard ratios of organic solvents.
Debia M; Krishnan K
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Oct; 21(7-8):583-601. PubMed ID: 21120751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
