BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37366148)

  • 21. CT based 3-dimensional treatment planning of intracavitary brachytherapy for cancer of the cervix: comparison between dose-volume histograms and ICRU point doses to the rectum and bladder.
    Hashim N; Jamalludin Z; Ung NM; Ho GF; Malik RA; Phua VC
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(13):5259-64. PubMed ID: 25040985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A novel external beam radiotherapy method for cervical cancer patients using virtual straight or bending boost areas; an in-silico feasibility study.
    Cozzi L; Beriwal S; Kuusela E; Chopra S; Burger H; Joubert N; Fogliata A; Agarwal JP; Kupelian P
    Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jun; 16(1):110. PubMed ID: 34127013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A dosimetric analysis of volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy with jaw width restriction vs 7 field intensity-modulated radiotherapy for definitive treatment of cervical cancer.
    Huang B; Fang Z; Huang Y; Lin P; Chen Z
    Br J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 87(1039):20140183. PubMed ID: 24834477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Highly Efficient Training, Refinement, and Validation of a Knowledge-based Planning Quality-Control System for Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials.
    Li N; Carmona R; Sirak I; Kasaova L; Followill D; Michalski J; Bosch W; Straube W; Mell LK; Moore KL
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jan; 97(1):164-172. PubMed ID: 27979445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A feasibility study of using advanced external beam techniques to create a vaginal cuff brachytherapy-like endometrial boost plan.
    Grelewicz Z; Zerrusen B; Sathiaseelan V; Zhang H
    Med Dosim; 2018 Spring; 43(1):30-38. PubMed ID: 28886961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A dosimetric comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy in localized cervical cancer radiotherapy.
    Wali L; Helal A; Darwesh R; Attar M
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(3):473-483. PubMed ID: 30958322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of bowel gas and body outline variations on total accumulated dose with intensity-modulated proton therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer patients.
    Berger T; Petersen JBB; Lindegaard JC; Fokdal LU; Tanderup K
    Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1472-1478. PubMed ID: 28931343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy.
    Cozzi L; Dinshaw KA; Shrivastava SK; Mahantshetty U; Engineer R; Deshpande DD; Jamema SV; Vanetti E; Clivio A; Nicolini G; Fogliata A
    Radiother Oncol; 2008 Nov; 89(2):180-91. PubMed ID: 18692929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.
    Tran A; Zhang J; Woods K; Yu V; Nguyen D; Gustafson G; Rosen L; Sheng K
    Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):10. PubMed ID: 28077128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radiobiological optimization comparison between pulse-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Annede P; Dumas I; Schernberg A; Tailleur A; Fumagalli I; Bockel S; Mignot F; Kissel M; Deutsch E; Haie-Meder C; Chargari C
    Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):370-377. PubMed ID: 30797698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of intrafraction motion of the organs at risk in image-based brachytherapy of cervical cancer.
    Simha V; Patel FD; Sharma SC; Rai B; Oinam AS; krishnatry R; Dhanireddy B
    Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 25030951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dosimetric advantages of proton therapy compared with photon therapy using an adaptive strategy in cervical cancer.
    van de Schoot AJ; de Boer P; Crama KF; Visser J; Stalpers LJ; Rasch CR; Bel A
    Acta Oncol; 2016 Jul; 55(7):892-9. PubMed ID: 26934821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of ICRU point doses and volumetric doses of organs at risk (OARs) in brachytherapy for cervical cancer.
    Vinod SK; Caldwell K; Lau A; Fowler AR
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2011 Jun; 55(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 21696566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Associations between volume changes and spatial dose metrics for the urinary bladder during local versus pelvic irradiation for prostate cancer.
    Casares-Magaz O; Moiseenko V; Hopper A; Pettersson NJ; Thor M; Knopp R; Deasy JO; Muren LP; Einck J
    Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):884-890. PubMed ID: 28401808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Point vs. volumetric bladder and rectal doses in combined intracavitary-interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy: correlation and comparison with published Vienna applicator data.
    Yaparpalvi R; Mutyala S; Gorla GR; Butler J; Mah D; Garg MK; Kalnicki S
    Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(4):336-42. PubMed ID: 18782683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Defining the "Hostile Pelvis" for Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy: The Impact of Anatomic Variations in Pelvic Dimensions on Dose Delivered to Target Volumes and Organs at Risk in Patients With High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Whole Pelvic Radiation Therapy.
    Yirmibeşoğlu Erkal E; Karabey S; Karabey A; Hayran M; Erkal HŞ
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jul; 92(4):894-903. PubMed ID: 26104941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fan beam CT-guided online adaptive external radiotherapy of uterine cervical cancer: a dosimetric evaluation.
    Peng H; Zhang J; Xu N; Zhou Y; Tan H; Ren T
    BMC Cancer; 2023 Jun; 23(1):588. PubMed ID: 37365516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of bladder filling on doses to prostate and organs at risk: a treatment planning study.
    Moiseenko V; Liu M; Kristensen S; Gelowitz G; Berthelet E
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 8(1):55-68. PubMed ID: 17592448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dosimetric advantages of a clinical daily adaptive plan selection strategy compared with a non-adaptive strategy in cervical cancer radiation therapy.
    van de Schoot AJAJ; de Boer P; Visser J; Stalpers LJA; Rasch CRN; Bel A
    Acta Oncol; 2017 May; 56(5):667-674. PubMed ID: 28447562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative evaluation of two-dimensional radiography and three dimensional computed tomography based dose-volume parameters for high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy of cervical cancer: a prospective study.
    Madan R; Pathy S; Subramani V; Sharma S; Mohanti BK; Chander S; Thulkar S; Kumar L; Dadhwal V
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(11):4717-21. PubMed ID: 24969909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.