BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37368158)

  • 1. Outcomes of assisted reproductive technology procedures performed on weekdays versus weekends: a retrospective cohort study.
    Dolinko AV; Koelper NC; Berger DS; Dokras A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2023 Sep; 40(9):2091-2099. PubMed ID: 37368158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of donor sperm in addition to oocyte donation after repeated implantation failure in normozoospermic patients does not improve live birth rates.
    Blázquez A; García D; Rodríguez A; Vassena R; Vernaeve V
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Nov; 31(11):2549-2553. PubMed ID: 27609983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro fertilization and multiple pregnancies: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2006; 6(18):1-63. PubMed ID: 23074488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Leave the past behind: women's reproductive history shows no association with blastocysts' euploidy and limited association with live birth rates after euploid embryo transfers.
    Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Soscia D; Giancani A; Scepi E; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Mar; 36(4):929-940. PubMed ID: 33608730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of IVF/ICSI-FET Outcomes in Women With Advanced Endometriosis: Influence on Ovarian Response and Oocyte Competence.
    Li A; Zhang J; Kuang Y; Yu C
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2020; 11():427. PubMed ID: 32765424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What is the reproductive potential of day 7 euploid embryos?
    Hernandez-Nieto C; Lee JA; Slifkin R; Sandler B; Copperman AB; Flisser E
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 31398251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014†.
    Chambers GM; Dyer S; Zegers-Hochschild F; de Mouzon J; Ishihara O; Banker M; Mansour R; Kupka MS; Adamson GD
    Hum Reprod; 2021 Oct; 36(11):2921-2934. PubMed ID: 34601605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oocyte Degeneration After ICSI Is Not an Indicator of Live Birth in Young Women.
    Hu X; Liu Y; Zhang X; Lee P; Wen Y; Ding C; Zhou C; Xu Y
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():705733. PubMed ID: 34484119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The slow growing embryo and premature progesterone elevation: compounding factors for embryo-endometrial asynchrony.
    Healy MW; Yamasaki M; Patounakis G; Richter KS; Devine K; DeCherney AH; Hill MJ
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):362-367. PubMed ID: 27986817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fresh embryo transfer after in vitro insemination of fresh vs. cryopreserved anonymous donor oocytes: which has a better live birth rate? A Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System analysis.
    Whynott RM; Summers KM; Ball GD; Van Voorhis BJ; Sparks A
    Fertil Steril; 2022 Apr; 117(4):803-810. PubMed ID: 35216830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicted probabilities of live birth following assisted reproductive technology using United States national surveillance data from 2016 to 2018.
    Gaskins AJ; Zhang Y; Chang J; Kissin DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 May; 228(5):557.e1-557.e10. PubMed ID: 36702210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of comprehensive state insurance mandates on in vitro fertilization utilization, embryo transfer practices, and outcomes in the United States.
    Peipert BJ; Chung EH; Harris BS; Jain T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jul; 227(1):64.e1-64.e8. PubMed ID: 35283088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association of Fresh Embryo Transfers Compared With Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfers With Live Birth Rate Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Using Freshly Retrieved Donor Oocytes.
    Insogna IG; Lanes A; Lee MS; Ginsburg ES; Fox JH
    JAMA; 2021 Jan; 325(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 33433574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ICSI does not increase the cumulative live birth rate in non-male factor infertility.
    Li Z; Wang AY; Bowman M; Hammarberg K; Farquhar C; Johnson L; Safi N; Sullivan EA
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Jul; 33(7):1322-1330. PubMed ID: 29897449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.
    Glujovsky D; Farquhar C; Quinteiro Retamar AM; Alvarez Sedo CR; Blake D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jun; (6):CD002118. PubMed ID: 27357126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
    Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimizing mosaicism: assessing the impact of fertilization method on rate of mosaicism after next-generation sequencing (NGS) preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).
    Palmerola KL; Vitez SF; Amrane S; Fischer CP; Forman EJ
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Jan; 36(1):153-157. PubMed ID: 30362056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Day after rescue ICSI: eliminating total fertilization failure after conventional IVF with high live birth rates following cryopreserved blastocyst transfer.
    Batha S; Ardestani G; Ocali O; Jarmuz P; Vaughan DA; Barrett CB; Sakkas D
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Jul; 38(7):1277-1283. PubMed ID: 37208859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.
    Glujovsky D; Quinteiro Retamar AM; Alvarez Sedo CR; Ciapponi A; Cornelisse S; Blake D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 May; 5(5):CD002118. PubMed ID: 35588094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.