140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37369097)
21. The Reliability and Acceptability of RDx-Based Tele-Controlled Subjective Refraction Compared with Traditional Subjective Refraction.
Huang J; Li X; Yan T; Wen L; Pan L; Yang Z
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Nov; 11(11):16. PubMed ID: 36394842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Repeatability of Aberrometry-Based Automated Subjective Refraction in Healthy and Keratoconus Subjects.
Carracedo G; Carpena-Torres C; Pastrana C; Privado-Aroco A; Serramito M; Batres L
J Ophthalmol; 2020; 2020():4831298. PubMed ID: 33489331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Clinical Accuracy of the Nidek ARK-1 Autorefractor.
Paudel N; Adhikari S; Thakur A; Shrestha B; Loughman J
Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 31107837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of subjective refraction with a clinical adaptive optics visual simulator.
Hervella L; Villegas EA; Prieto PM; Artal P
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jan; 45(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 30309774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Instant vision assessment device for measuring refraction in low vision.
Cheng D; Woo GC
Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Sep; 104(7):780-787. PubMed ID: 33689633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Agreement Between Swept-Source Optical Biometry and Scheimpflug-based Topography Measurements of Anterior Segment Parameters.
Özyol P; Özyol E
Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 169():73-78. PubMed ID: 27320057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Agreement and variability of subjective refraction, autorefraction, and wavefront aberrometry in pseudophakic patients.
Ruiss M; Findl O; Draschl P; Harrer-Seely A; Hirnschall N
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1056-1063. PubMed ID: 34292891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. COMPARISON OF SMARTPHONE-BASED AND AUTOMATED REFRACTION WITH SUBJECTIVE REFRACTION FOR SCREENING OF REFRACTIVE ERRORS.
Ee CL; Samsudin A
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2022 Oct; 29(5):588-594. PubMed ID: 34620023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Wavefront analyzers induce instrument myopia.
Cervino A; Hosking SL; Rai GK; Naroo SA; Gilmartin B
J Refract Surg; 2006 Oct; 22(8):795-803. PubMed ID: 17061717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of cycloplegia on the measurement of refractive error in Chinese children.
Li T; Zhou X; Zhu J; Tang X; Gu X
Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 30136309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison Between Aberrometry-Based Binocular Refraction and Subjective Refraction.
Carracedo G; Carpena-Torres C; Serramito M; Batres-Valderas L; Gonzalez-Bergaz A
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2018 Jul; 7(4):11. PubMed ID: 30087806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluating refraction and visual acuity with the Nidek autorefractometer AR-360A in a randomized population-based screening study.
Stoor K; Karvonen E; Liinamaa J; Saarela V
Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 96(4):384-389. PubMed ID: 29193822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparisons of the handheld autorefractor, table-mounted autorefractor, and subjective refraction in Singapore adults.
Farook M; Venkatramani J; Gazzard G; Cheng A; Tan D; Saw SM
Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 82(12):1066-70. PubMed ID: 16357649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of WASCA Aberrometer Refraction Compared to Manifest Refraction and Cycloplegic Refraction in Hyperopia Measurement.
Fu D; Ding X; Shang J; Yu Z; Zhou X
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2020 Oct; 9(11):5. PubMed ID: 33101782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children.
Lei Y; Chen X; Cheng M; Li B; Jiang Y; Xu Y; Wang X
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 May; 261(5):1465-1472. PubMed ID: 36527496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Characterisation of internal, refractive, and corneal astigmatism in a UK university student population.
Nagra M; Dashrathi R; Senthan E; Jahan T; Campbell P
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2020 Aug; 43(4):333-337. PubMed ID: 32094053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of a Portable Wavefront Aberrometer for Community Screening Refraction in the Elderly.
Plum W; Varadaraj V; Dosto N; Thompson SL; Gajwani P; Friedman DS
Optom Vis Sci; 2021 Mar; 98(3):289-294. PubMed ID: 33633020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy evaluation of objective refraction using the wavefront aberrometer in pseudophakic eyes.
Hou M; Ding Y; Liu L; Xu Y; Li J; Wu M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Oct; 258(10):2213-2221. PubMed ID: 32577855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses.
Lopes-Ferreira DP; Neves HI; Faria-Ribeiro M; Queirós A; Fernandes PR; González-Méijome JM
Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Apr; 38(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 25529474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Repeatability and Reproducibility of Virtual Subjective Refraction.
Perches S; Collados MV; Ares J
Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Oct; 93(10):1243-53. PubMed ID: 27391538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
