These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37369097)

  • 61. Comparison of Refractive Measures of Three Autorefractors in Children and Adolescents.
    Xiong S; Lv M; Zou H; Zhu J; Lu L; Zhang B; Deng J; Yao C; He X; Xu X
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 94(9):894-902. PubMed ID: 28816868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Effect of 0.02% and 0.01% atropine on astigmatism: a two-year clinical trial.
    Wang M; Cui C; Sui Y; Yu SA; Ma JX; Fu AC
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):161. PubMed ID: 35392841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Comparison of aberrometer and autorefractor measures of refractive error in children.
    Martinez AA; Pandian A; Sankaridurg P; Rose K; Huynh SC; Mitchell P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 83(11):811-7. PubMed ID: 17106401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. [Intraoperative Measurement of Refraction with a Hand-Held Autorefractometer].
    Gesser C; Küper T; Richard G; Hassenstein A
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Jul; 232(7):863-6. PubMed ID: 25853944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The Refractive Error of Professional Baseball Players.
    Laby DM; Kirschen DG
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 May; 94(5):564-573. PubMed ID: 28430758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Automated refraction after trifocal and trifocal toric intraocular lens implantation.
    Rementería-Capelo LA; García-Pérez JL; Contreras I; Blázquez V; Ruiz-Alcocer J
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 May; 31(3):1031-1038. PubMed ID: 32264702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The components of adult astigmatism and their age-related changes.
    Rozema JJ; Hershko S; Tassignon MJ;
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2019 May; 39(3):183-193. PubMed ID: 30994201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Accuracy, speed and repeatability of the voice assisted subjective refractor (VASR).
    Kabat AG; Lievens CW; Newman CM; Weber J
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2019; 13():1807-1813. PubMed ID: 31571819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Comparison between wavefront-derived refraction and auto-refraction.
    Yakar K; Kan E; Duran M
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Dec; 44():103712. PubMed ID: 37459941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Agreement and Repeatability of Noncycloplegic and Cycloplegic Wavefront-based Autorefraction in Children.
    Rauscher FG; Lange H; Yahiaoui-Doktor M; Tegetmeyer H; Sterker I; Hinz A; Wahl S; Wiedemann P; Ohlendorf A; Blendowske R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Nov; 96(11):879-889. PubMed ID: 31703049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Open versus closed view autorefraction in young adults.
    Nagra M; Akhtar A; Huntjens B; Campbell P
    J Optom; 2021; 14(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 32792330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Reproducibility of manifest refraction between surgeons and optometrists in a clinical refractive surgery practice.
    Reinstein DZ; Yap TE; Carp GI; Archer TJ; Gobbe M;
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):450-9. PubMed ID: 24581774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Validation of an Affordable Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
    Rubio M; Hernández CS; Seco E; Perez-Merino P; Casares I; Dave SR; Lim D; Durr NJ; Lage E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Oct; 96(10):726-732. PubMed ID: 31592955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Incidence of refractive errors with corrective aids subsequent selection].
    Benes P; Synek S; Petrová S; Sokolová SJ; Forýtková L; Holoubková Z
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 Feb; 68(1):11-4, 16. PubMed ID: 22679692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Validation of a Simple-to-Use, Affordable, Portable Wavefront Aberrometry-Based Auto Refractometer in a Paediatric Population.
    Rao DP; Negiloni K; Gurunathan S; Velkumar S; Sivaraman A; Baig AU; B K; Murali K
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2022; 16():4281-4291. PubMed ID: 36578668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Longitudinal change and stability of refractive, keratometric, and internal astigmatism in childhood.
    Harvey EM; Miller JM; Twelker JD; Sherrill DL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Dec; 56(1):190-8. PubMed ID: 25515577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Design and Clinical Evaluation of a Handheld Wavefront Autorefractor.
    Durr NJ; Dave SR; Vera-Diaz FA; Lim D; Dorronsoro C; Marcos S; Thorn F; Lage E
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Dec; 92(12):1140-7. PubMed ID: 26580271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Using Artificial Intelligence and Novel Polynomials to Predict Subjective Refraction.
    Rampat R; Debellemanière G; Malet J; Gatinel D
    Sci Rep; 2020 May; 10(1):8565. PubMed ID: 32444650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Bi-directional Refractive Compensation for With-the-Rule and Against-the-Rule Astigmatism in Young Adults.
    Chan KH; Shik HT; Kwok KW; Kee CS; Leung TW
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2022 Sep; 63(10):15. PubMed ID: 36155745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Repeatability and agreement of ocular biometry measurements: Aladdin versus Lenstar.
    McAlinden C; Gao R; Yu A; Wang X; Yang J; Yu Y; Chen H; Wang Q; Huang J
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Sep; 101(9):1223-1229. PubMed ID: 28130351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.