131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37369884)
1. Features of ductal carcinoma in situ ultrasound images.
Watanabe T
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2023 Jul; 50(3):347-350. PubMed ID: 37369884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound Image Classification of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast: Analysis of 705 DCIS Lesions.
Watanabe T; Yamaguchi T; Tsunoda H; Kaoku S; Tohno E; Yasuda H; Ban K; Hirokaga K; Tanaka K; Umemoto T; Okuno T; Fujimoto Y; Nakatani S; Ito J; Ueno E
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):918-925. PubMed ID: 28242086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characteristics of ultrasonographic images of ductal carcinoma in situ with abnormalities of the ducts.
Ban K; Tsunoda H; Watanabe T; Kaoku S; Yamaguchi T; Ueno E; Hirokaga K; Tanaka K
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2020 Jan; 47(1):107-115. PubMed ID: 31655940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond BI-RADS: Nonmass Abnormalities on Breast Ultrasound.
Tsunoda H; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 25(2):134-145. PubMed ID: 38238012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sonographic findings of high-grade and non-high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Park JS; Park YM; Kim EK; Kim SJ; Han SS; Lee SJ; In HS; Ryu JH
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1687-97. PubMed ID: 21098839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound Breast Elastographic Evaluation of Mass-Forming Ductal Carcinoma-in-situ with Histological Correlation - New Findings for a Toothpaste Sign.
Leong LC; Sim LS; Jara-Lazaro AR; Tan PH
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(5):2673-8. PubMed ID: 27268649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasonographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ: analysis of 219 lesions.
Li JK; Wang HF; He Y; Huang Y; Liu G; Wang ZL
Gland Surg; 2020 Dec; 9(6):1945-1954. PubMed ID: 33447545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Non-mass-type ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast on ultrasound: Features and pathological analysis.
Zhang P; Kong P; Liu D; He S; Zhang X
J Cancer Res Ther; 2024 Apr; 20(2):665-668. PubMed ID: 38687938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Analysis of 127 Cases.
Li W; Zhou Q; Xia S; Wu Y; Fei X; Wang Y; Tao L; Fan J; Zhou W
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Jan; 39(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 31206200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity of mammography and ultrasonography on detecting abnormal findings of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Boonjunwetwatmd D; Chyutipraiwan U; Sampatanukul P; Chatamra K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Mar; 90(3):539-45. PubMed ID: 17427533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: ultrasound and mammographic findings correlated with histological findings.
Cho KR; Seo BK; Kim CH; Whang KW; Kim YH; Kim BH; Woo OH; Lee YH; Chung KB
Yonsei Med J; 2008 Feb; 49(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 18306476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictors of Invasive Breast Cancer in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy.
Shin YJ; Kim SM; Yun B; Jang M; Kim B; Lee SH
J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Feb; 38(2):481-488. PubMed ID: 30069893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What are the characteristics of breast cancers misclassified as benign by quantitative ultrasound shear wave elastography?
Vinnicombe SJ; Whelehan P; Thomson K; McLean D; Purdie CA; Jordan LB; Hubbard S; Evans AJ
Eur Radiol; 2014 Apr; 24(4):921-6. PubMed ID: 24326756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the usefulness of breast strain elastography for intraductal lesions.
Kokubu Y; Yamada K; Tanabe M; Izumori A; Kato C; Horii R; Ohno S; Matsueda K
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 33389371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histopathological characteristics of breast ductal carcinoma in situ and association with imaging findings.
Tang X; Yamashita T; Hara M; Kumaki N; Tokuda Y; Masuda S
Breast Cancer; 2016 May; 23(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 25644245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sonographic findings of pure ductal carcinoma in situ.
Lee MH; Ko EY; Han BK; Shin JH; Ko ES; Hahn SY
J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 Oct; 41(8):465-71. PubMed ID: 23949917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Case Series of Malign Hyperechoic Breast Lesions.
Yilmaz TF; Sari L; Temur HO; Toprak H; Yildiz Ş
Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(6):766-773. PubMed ID: 32723248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imaging and pathologic features of non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: can sonography predict upgrade?
Komarla R; Gilliland L; Piraner M; Seidel R; Clifford K; Kunjummen J
Br J Radiol; 2022 Feb; 95(1130):20211013. PubMed ID: 34870448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SONOELASTOGRAPHIC FEATURES OF HIGH-RISK BREAST LESIONS AND DUCTAL CARCINOMA
Crnogorac M; Ivanac G; Tomasović-Lončarić Č; Žic R; Kelava T; Brkljačić B
Acta Clin Croat; 2019 Mar; 58(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 31363320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-mass versus mass-like ultrasound patterns in ductal carcinoma in situ: is there an association with high-risk histology?
Gunawardena DS; Burrows S; Taylor DB
Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):140-147. PubMed ID: 31739979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
