These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3737156)

  • 1. [A device for determining the function of the forearm (rotatometer)].
    Prokin BM; Iablonskiĭ VG
    Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1986 May; (5):40-1. PubMed ID: 3737156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [A protractor-rotatometer].
    Tol'tsiner NF
    Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1989 Nov; (11):76. PubMed ID: 2630999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A device for determining the mobility of the cervical spine].
    Tysiachnyĭ ND
    Voen Med Zh; 1991 Sep; (9):69. PubMed ID: 1759367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Rotatometer, an apparatus for measurement of the amplitude of forearm supination and pronation].
    MOS'KIN VIa
    Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1957; 18(4):56-7. PubMed ID: 13504693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Orthopedic gravitational geniometer-rotatometer].
    Isaev ZIa; Kiselev VN; Samoĭlovich EF
    Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1981 Oct; (10):58. PubMed ID: 7312324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Device for the setting up of the forearm during surgery].
    Zaripov ZA
    Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1977 Nov; (11):74-5. PubMed ID: 609442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Goniometer for determining the amplitude of motion in the cervical spine].
    Vershinin AE; Nazarenko GF
    Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1986 Sep; (9):49-50. PubMed ID: 3785921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An apparatus for measuring passive resistance to movement of the forearm in man.
    Schnieden H
    Br J Pharmacol; 1969 Oct; 37(2):542P-543P. PubMed ID: 5348456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measures of the forearm via a portable device: ready for prime time?
    Putman MS; Gordon CM
    J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(1):125-6. PubMed ID: 23374745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Device and method for determining the functional state of the spine].
    Akhmadov TZ
    Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1981 Dec; (12):54-5. PubMed ID: 7329650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Device for determining the degree of mobility of the cervical and lumbar segments of the spine].
    Iarovoi VK
    Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1984 Jan; (1):57-9. PubMed ID: 6717942
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ambulatory devices for chronic gait disorders in the elderly.
    Van Hook FW; Demonbreun D; Weiss BD
    Am Fam Physician; 2003 Apr; 67(8):1717-24. PubMed ID: 12725450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of an objective device for assessing circumductive wrist motion.
    Franko OI; Lal S; Pauyo T; Alexander M; Zurakowski D; Day C
    J Hand Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 33(8):1293-300. PubMed ID: 18929191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Goniometer].
    Savchenko VK; Novitskiĭ GA; Vasil'chuk AA
    Revmatologiia (Mosk); 1984; (1):60-1. PubMed ID: 6372011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal position for the one-bone forearm. An analysis using a hinged brace in normal subjects.
    Chan PS; Blazer PE; Bozentka DJ; Gonzalez JB; Naranja RJ; Roros B
    J Hand Surg Br; 1999 Dec; 24(6):724-6. PubMed ID: 10672812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [A stand for measuring the strength characteristics of crural muscles in orthopedic-traumatological patients].
    Kudrin BI; Shchurov VA; Stegalin AA
    Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1985 Aug; (8):55-7. PubMed ID: 4069658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of tennis racket grip size on forearm muscle firing patterns.
    Hatch GF; Pink MM; Mohr KJ; Sethi PM; Jobe FW
    Am J Sports Med; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1977-83. PubMed ID: 16861576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship of individual differences and subsequent changes in static strength with speed of forearm flexion movement.
    Macintosh DD
    Res Q; 1968 Mar; 39(1):138-48. PubMed ID: 5239576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Autonomy versus forcing in the organization of human rhythmic forearm movements.
    Pailhous J; Bonnard M; Coyle T
    C R Acad Sci III; 1996 Sep; 319(9):773-7. PubMed ID: 8952880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A device for evaluating the contractile activity of the skeletal muscles].
    Kuznetsova NL; Volkova AM; Pan'kov AD
    Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1987 May; (5):60. PubMed ID: 3627756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.