These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3737346)

  • 1. Features versus spatial phase in a tachistoscopic laterality experiment.
    Rentschler I; Christen L; Christen S; Landis T
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Mar; 39(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 3737346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interhemispheric differences in same versus different judgments upon presentation of complex visual stimuli.
    Magnani G; Mazzucchi A; Parma M
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(4):527-30. PubMed ID: 6483181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In eliciting hemisphere asymmetries which is more important: the stimulus input side or the recognition side? A tachistoscopic study on normals.
    Berrini R; Della Sala S; Spinnler H; Sterzi R; Vallar G
    Neuropsychologia; 1982; 20(1):91-4. PubMed ID: 7070656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The nature of the task-stimulus interaction in the tachistoscopic recognition of kana and kanji words.
    Sasanuma S; Itoh M; Kobayashi Y; Mori K
    Brain Lang; 1980 Mar; 9(2):298-306. PubMed ID: 7363073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bilateral tachistoscopic perception, handedness, and laterality. II. Nonverbal stimuli.
    Schmuller J; Goodman R
    Brain Lang; 1980 Sep; 11(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 7427713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Significance of functional hemispheric asymmetries in the visual area, detected by tachistoscopic visual half-field stimulation. Attempt at differentiation of the results of a trial series in children of elementary school age using a cluster analytic method].
    Spiel G; Kral G
    Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1986; 33(2):254-77. PubMed ID: 3705631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bilateral tachistoscopic perception, handedness, and laterality.
    Schmuller J; Goodman R
    Brain Lang; 1979 Jul; 8(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 476478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationships between speed, accuracy of performance and hemispheric superiorities for visuo-spatial pattern processing in the two sexes.
    Nichelli P; Manni A; Faglioni P
    Neuropsychologia; 1983; 21(6):625-32. PubMed ID: 6664481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus repetition in studies of laterality.
    Schmuller J
    Brain Lang; 1980 May; 10(1):205-7. PubMed ID: 7378724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lateralization: a closer look at the verbal laterality pattern in the bilateral paradigm.
    Kirby HW; Duda PD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Feb; 52(1):57-8. PubMed ID: 7232099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring visual disembedding in a tachistoscopic presentation.
    Zoccolotti P; Pizzamiglio L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Apr; 54(2):479-86. PubMed ID: 7079073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Visual recognition and hemispheric asymmetry. Tachistoscopic study of pattern recognition].
    Stanzione M; Angelini R; Orsini A; Grossi D
    Acta Neurol (Napoli); 1986 Aug; 8(4):340-6. PubMed ID: 3776713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus versus face recognition in laterally displayed stimuli.
    Bruyer R; Abdi H; Benoit J
    Am J Psychol; 1987; 100(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 3592025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociation between normal hemispheres in delayed recognition of verbal and spatial cues of the same visual pattern.
    Spinnler H; Sterzi R; Tobaldini L; Vallar G
    Behav Brain Res; 1982 Nov; 6(3):227-36. PubMed ID: 6293518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of spatial arrangement of letter pairs in a name-matching task with unilateral and bilateral hemifield stimulation.
    Schmitz-Gielsdorf J; Willmes K; Vondenhoff C; Hartje W
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(4):591-602. PubMed ID: 3405402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hemisphere differences in the recognition of nonsense shapes: cerebral dominance or strategy effects?
    Birkett P
    Cortex; 1978 Jun; 14(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 679705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lateral organization and the perception of orientation in pictures: a comment on Freimuth & Wapner's experiment.
    Gordon IE
    Br J Psychol; 1981 Aug; 72(Pt 3):317-9. PubMed ID: 7317715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hemispheric differences for feature perception.
    Polich J; Crossman DL; DeFrancesco DP
    Psychol Res; 1988; 50(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 3212146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual-field differences in recognition of male and female faces.
    Brouwers P; Mononen LJ; Stefanatos GA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Oct; 51(2):627-33. PubMed ID: 7443383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A simple demonstration of border dominance in binocular rivalry.
    Remole A
    Percept Psychophys; 1980 Jul; 28(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 7413413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.