These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3737362)

  • 1. Perceived size and motion in depth from optical expansion.
    Swanston MT; Gogel WC
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 May; 39(5):309-26. PubMed ID: 3737362
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A neglected problem: kinetic size constancy.
    Noguchi K; Taya K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1981 Aug; 48(1-3):187-94. PubMed ID: 7304227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Apparent relative size and depth of moving objects.
    Kaneko H; Uchikawa K
    Perception; 1993; 22(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 8414880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. THE SIZE CUE TO VISUALLY PERCEIVED DISTANCE. AM 64-13.
    GOGEL WC
    Rep Civ Aeromed Res Inst US; 1964 Jan; ():1-25. PubMed ID: 14293289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SIZE CUE TO VISUALLY PERCEIVED DISTANCE.
    GOGEL WC
    Psychol Bull; 1964 Oct; 62():217-35. PubMed ID: 14219970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rate of apparent magnification as a cue to distance: laboratory investigation.
    Ton WH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Aug; 35(1):283-8. PubMed ID: 5054052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of display size on disparity scaling from differential perspective and vergence cues.
    Bradshaw MF; Glennerster A; Rogers BJ
    Vision Res; 1996 May; 36(9):1255-64. PubMed ID: 8711905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The roles of convergence and apparent distance in depth constancy with motion parallax.
    Rivest J; Ono H; Saida S
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Nov; 46(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 2813024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Apparent motion in depth resulting from changing size and changing vergence.
    Heuer H
    Perception; 1987; 16(3):337-50. PubMed ID: 3432029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceived rigidity in motion-in-depth increases with contour perspective.
    Vienne C; Blondé L; Mamassian P
    Perception; 2014; 43(6):481-98. PubMed ID: 25154283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Convergence responses to monocularly viewed objects: implications for distance perception.
    Predebon J
    Perception; 1994; 23(3):303-19. PubMed ID: 7971108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retinal and assumed size cues as determinants of size and distance perception.
    BAIRD JC
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 Aug; 66():155-62. PubMed ID: 13969069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The interaction of binocular disparity and motion parallax in determining perceived depth and perceived size.
    Bradshaw MF; Parton AD; Eagle RA
    Perception; 1998; 27(11):1317-31. PubMed ID: 10505177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Agreement between indirect measures of perceived distance.
    Gogel WC; Loomis JM; Newman NJ; Sharkey TJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Jan; 37(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 3991314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of motion parallax and perspective cues on perceived size and distance.
    Tozawa J; Oyama T
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1007-23. PubMed ID: 17076062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Asymmetry in the perception of motion-in-depth.
    Shirai N; Yamaguchi MK
    Vision Res; 2004 May; 44(10):1003-11. PubMed ID: 15031093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An airplane illusion: apparent velocity determined by apparent distance.
    Hershenson M; Samuels SM
    Perception; 1999; 28(4):433-6. PubMed ID: 10664784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Depth scaling in phantom and monocular gap stereograms using absolute distance information.
    Kuroki D; Nakamizo S
    Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(25):4206-16. PubMed ID: 17045325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of familiar size at familiar distances.
    Fitzpatrick V; Pasnak R; Tyer ZE
    Perception; 1982; 11(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 7133938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The vista paradox: is the effect partly explained by induced movement?
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jan; 47(1):95-6. PubMed ID: 2300431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.