145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37376394)
1. Removal, Adsorption, and Cleaning of Pharmaceutical on Polyamide RO and NF Membranes.
Dolar D; Ćurić I; Ašperger D
Polymers (Basel); 2023 Jun; 15(12):. PubMed ID: 37376394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of feed solution characteristics and membrane fouling on the removal of THMs by UF/NF/RO membranes.
Fang C; Ou T; Wang X; Rui M; Chu W
Chemosphere; 2020 Dec; 260():127625. PubMed ID: 32758776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adsorption of pharmaceuticals onto isolated polyamide active layer of NF/RO membranes.
Liu YL; Wang XM; Yang HW; Xie YF
Chemosphere; 2018 Jun; 200():36-47. PubMed ID: 29471167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of water matrix on the rejection of neutral pharmaceutically active compound by thin-film composite nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Shah IA; Ali S; Yang Z; Ihsanullah I; Huang H
Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 3):135211. PubMed ID: 35660049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of residual organic macromolecules produced in biological wastewater treatment processes on removal of pharmaceuticals by NF/RO membranes.
Kimura K; Iwase T; Kita S; Watanabe Y
Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3751-8. PubMed ID: 19564034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An investigation of desalination by nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and integrated (hybrid NF/RO) membranes employed in brackish water treatment.
Talaeipour M; Nouri J; Hassani AH; Mahvi AH
J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2017; 15():18. PubMed ID: 28736617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of chemical cleaning on RO membrane inorganic, organic and microbial foulant removal in a full-scale plant for municipal wastewater reclamation.
Yu T; Meng L; Zhao QB; Shi Y; Hu HY; Lu Y
Water Res; 2017 Apr; 113():1-10. PubMed ID: 28183034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pilot-Scale Assessment of Urea as a Chemical Cleaning Agent for Biofouling Control in Spiral-Wound Reverse Osmosis Membrane Elements.
Sanawar H; Bucs SS; Pot MA; Zlopasa J; Farhat NM; Witkamp GJ; Kruithof JC; van Loosdrecht MCM; Vrouwenvelder JS
Membranes (Basel); 2019 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 31500149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rejection of emerging organic micropollutants in nanofiltration-reverse osmosis membrane applications.
Xu P; Drewes JE; Bellona C; Amy G; Kim TU; Adam M; Heberer T
Water Environ Res; 2005; 77(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15765934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of water matrices on removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Dolar D; Vuković A; Asperger D; Kosutić K
J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(8):1299-307. PubMed ID: 22128537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhanced biofilm solubilization by urea in reverse osmosis membrane systems.
Sanawar H; Pinel I; Farhat NM; Bucs SS; Zlopasa J; Kruithof JC; Witkamp GJ; van Loosdrecht MCM; Vrouwenvelder JS
Water Res X; 2018 Dec; 1():100004. PubMed ID: 31194008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes.
Yoon J; Amy G; Chung J; Sohn J; Yoon Y
Chemosphere; 2009 Sep; 77(2):228-35. PubMed ID: 19679331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Renewable energy powered membrane technology: Implications of adhesive interaction between membrane and organic matter on spontaneous osmotic backwash cleaning.
Cai YH; Gopalakrishnan A; Deshmukh KP; Schäfer AI
Water Res; 2022 Aug; 221():118752. PubMed ID: 35810632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Exposure dose and temperature of chlorine on deterioration of thin-film composite membranes for reverse osmosis and nanofiltration.
An SA; Park CG; Lee JS; Cho SM; Woo YC; Kim HS
Chemosphere; 2023 Aug; 333():138929. PubMed ID: 37207901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A hybrid nanofiltration and reverse osmosis process for urine treatment: Effect on urea recovery and purity.
Courtney C; Randall DG
Water Res; 2022 Aug; 222():118851. PubMed ID: 35878521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rejection of pharmaceuticals in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane drinking water treatment.
Radjenović J; Petrović M; Ventura F; Barceló D
Water Res; 2008 Aug; 42(14):3601-10. PubMed ID: 18656225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Removal of pharmaceutically active compounds from water sources using nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes: Comparison of removal efficiencies and in-depth analysis of rejection mechanisms.
Matin A; Jillani SMS; Baig U; Ihsanullah I; Alhooshani K
J Environ Manage; 2023 Jul; 338():117682. PubMed ID: 37003228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
