154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37376564)
21. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors.
Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of side-specific biopsy and dominant tumor location at radical prostatectomy in predicting the side of nodal metastases in organ confined prostate cancer: is lymphatic spread really unpredictable?
De Luca S; Passera R; Fiori C; Garrou D; Manfredi M; Aimar R; Amparore D; Checcucci E; Bollito E; Porpiglia F
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2019 Apr; 71(2):146-153. PubMed ID: 30421597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Role of Metabolic Syndrome on Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes at Radical Prostatectomy in a Low-risk Prostate Cancer Cohort Potentially Eligible for Active Surveillance.
Colicchia M; Morlacco A; Rangel LJ; Carlson RE; Dal Moro F; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):425-432. PubMed ID: 29306730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Discrepancy in prostate cancer localization between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens in patients with unilateral positive biopsy: implications for focal therapy.
Sinnott M; Falzarano SM; Hernandez AV; Jones JS; Klein EA; Zhou M; Magi-Galluzzi C
Prostate; 2012 Aug; 72(11):1179-86. PubMed ID: 22161896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance characteristics of prostate-specific antigen density and biopsy core details to predict oncological outcome in patients with intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Yashi M; Nukui A; Tokura Y; Takei K; Suzuki I; Sakamoto K; Yuki H; Kambara T; Betsunoh H; Abe H; Fukabori Y; Nakazato Y; Kaji Y; Kamai T
BMC Urol; 2017 Jun; 17(1):47. PubMed ID: 28645325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Adenocarcinoma of the prostate with Gleason score 9-10 on core biopsy: correlation with findings at radical prostatectomy and prognosis.
Ellis CL; Partin AW; Han M; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2068-73. PubMed ID: 23727307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Role of prostate health index to predict Gleason score upgrading and high-risk prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Kim H; Jung G; Kim JH; Byun SS; Hong SK
Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):17447. PubMed ID: 34465825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The impact of prior TURP on radical prostatectomy surgical margins: a multicenter analysis.
Gacci M; Simonato A; Lanciotti M; Ennas M; Varca V; Maffezzini M; Imbimbo C; Gontero P; Schiavina R; Carini M; Martorana G; Nicita G; Mirone V; Carmignani G
Urol Int; 2013; 91(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 23735440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Questioning the Status Quo: Should Gleason Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer be Considered a "Negative Core" in Pre-Radical Prostatectomy Risk Nomograms? An International Multicenter Analysis.
Leong JY; Herrera-Caceres JO; Goldberg H; Tham E; Teplitsky S; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD; Fleshner NE; Tilki D; Chandrasekar T
Urology; 2020 Mar; 137():102-107. PubMed ID: 31705947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Preoperative characteristics of high-Gleason disease predictive of favourable pathological and clinical outcomes at radical prostatectomy.
Pierorazio PM; Ross AE; Lin BM; Epstein JI; Han M; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Pavlovich CP; Schaeffer EM
BJU Int; 2012 Oct; 110(8):1122-8. PubMed ID: 22373045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Older patients with low Charlson score and high-risk prostate cancer benefit from radical prostatectomy.
Sivaraman A; Ordaz Jurado G; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Dell'Oglio P; Joniau S; Bianchi M; Briganti A; Spahn M; Bastian P; Chun J; Chlosta P; Gontero P; Graefen M; Jeffrey Karnes R; Marchioro G; Tombal B; Tosco L; van der Poel HH; Sanchez-Salas R
World J Urol; 2016 Oct; 34(10):1367-72. PubMed ID: 26897499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Identifying the best candidate for radical prostatectomy among patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
Briganti A; Joniau S; Gontero P; Abdollah F; Passoni NM; Tombal B; Marchioro G; Kneitz B; Walz J; Frohneberg D; Bangma CH; Graefen M; Tizzani A; Frea B; Karnes RJ; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Spahn M
Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):584-92. PubMed ID: 22153925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Predictors of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens: can high grade tumor be predicted preoperatively?
Rubin MA; Mucci NR; Manley S; Sanda M; Cushenberry E; Strawderman M; Montie JE; Bassily NH
J Urol; 2001 Jan; 165(1):114-8. PubMed ID: 11125378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Vascular-targeted Photodynamic Therapy in Unilateral Low-risk Prostate Cancer in Germany: 2-yr Single-centre Experience in a Real-world Setting Compared with Radical Prostatectomy.
Flegar L; Buerk B; Proschmann R; Propping S; Groeben C; Baunacke M; Herout R; Huber J; Thomas C; Borkowetz A
Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Jan; 8(1):121-127. PubMed ID: 33602642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does cumulative prostate cancer length (CCL) in prostate biopsies improve prediction of clinically insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance?
Chen DJ; Falzarano SM; McKenney JK; Przybycin CG; Reynolds JP; Roma A; Jones JS; Stephenson A; Klein E; Magi-Galluzzi C
BJU Int; 2015 Aug; 116(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 25060664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Community-based Outcomes of Open versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Herlemann A; Cowan JE; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR
Eur Urol; 2018 Feb; 73(2):215-223. PubMed ID: 28499617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Race as an outcome predictor after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database.
Freedland SJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Kane CJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Aronson WJ;
Urology; 2002 Oct; 60(4):670-4. PubMed ID: 12385931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
Sebo TJ; Bock BJ; Cheville JC; Lohse C; Wollan P; Zincke H
J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
