180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37378263)
1. Lesion detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: human reader experiments indicate no benefit from the integration of information from multiple planes.
Balta C; Reiser I; Broeders MJM; Veldkamp WJH; van Engen RE; Sechopoulos I
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2023 Feb; 10(Suppl 1):S11915. PubMed ID: 37378263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography using a hybrid performance test.
Cockmartin L; Marshall NW; Van Ongeval C; Aerts G; Stalmans D; Zanca F; Shaheen E; De Keyzer F; Dance DR; Young KC; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2015 May; 60(10):3939-58. PubMed ID: 25909596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of artificial intelligence support on accuracy and reading time in breast tomosynthesis image interpretation: a multi-reader multi-case study.
van Winkel SL; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Appelman L; Gubern-Mérida A; Karssemeijer N; Teuwen J; Wanders AJT; Sechopoulos I; Mann RM
Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8682-8691. PubMed ID: 33948701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Deep learning denoising of digital breast tomosynthesis: Observer performance study of the effect on detection of microcalcifications in breast phantom images.
Chan HP; Helvie MA; Gao M; Hadjiiski L; Zhou C; Garver K; Klein KA; McLaughlin C; Oudsema R; Rahman WT; Roubidoux MA
Med Phys; 2023 Oct; 50(10):6177-6189. PubMed ID: 37145996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Developing breast lesion detection algorithms for digital breast tomosynthesis: Leveraging false positive findings.
Hossain MB; Nishikawa RM; Lee J
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7596-7608. PubMed ID: 35916103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Virtual assessment of stereoscopic viewing of digital breast tomosynthesis projection images.
Wen G; Chang HC; Reinhold J; Lo JY; Markey MK
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2018 Jan; 5(1):015501. PubMed ID: 29376103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does Reader Performance with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Vary according to Experience with Two-dimensional Mammography?
Tucker L; Gilbert FJ; Astley SM; Dibden A; Seth A; Morel J; Bundred S; Litherland J; Klassen H; Lip G; Purushothaman H; Dobson HM; McClure L; Skippage P; Stoner K; Kissin C; Beetles U; Lim YY; Hurley E; Goligher J; Rahim R; Gagliardi TJ; Suaris T; Duffy SW
Radiology; 2017 May; 283(2):371-380. PubMed ID: 28287917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification.
Petrillo A; Fusco R; Vallone P; Filice S; Granata V; Petrosino T; Rosaria Rubulotta M; Setola SV; Mattace Raso M; Maio F; Raiano C; Siani C; Di Bonito M; Botti G
Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):860-872. PubMed ID: 31886607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Model observer for assessing digital breast tomosynthesis for multi-lesion detection in the presence of anatomical noise.
Wen G; Markey MK; Haygood TM; Park S
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(4):045017. PubMed ID: 29376838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) screening using synthetically reconstructed projection images: an observer performance study.
Gur D; Zuley ML; Anello MI; Rathfon GY; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Wallace L; Lu A; Bandos AI
Acad Radiol; 2012 Feb; 19(2):166-71. PubMed ID: 22098941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of glandularity on the detection of simulated cancers in planar, tomosynthesis, and synthetic 2D imaging of the breast using a hybrid virtual clinical trial.
Mackenzie A; Kaur S; Thomson EL; Mitchell M; Elangovan P; Warren LM; Dance DR; Young KC
Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):6859-6868. PubMed ID: 34496038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiologists' performance in reading digital breast tomosynthesis with and without synthesized views for cancer detection.
Trieu PDY; Noakes J; Li T; Borecky N; Brennan PC; Barron ML; Lewis SJ
Br J Radiol; 2023 Apr; 96(1145):20220704. PubMed ID: 36802348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lesion detectability in 2D-mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using different targets and observers.
Elangovan P; Mackenzie A; Dance DR; Young KC; Wells K
Phys Med Biol; 2018 May; 63(9):095014. PubMed ID: 29637906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving digital breast tomosynthesis reading time: A pilot multi-reader, multi-case study using concurrent Computer-Aided Detection (CAD).
Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Levy L; Toubiana PR; Cohen-Scali F; Toledano AY; Boyer B
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 97():83-89. PubMed ID: 29153373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Detection Rate of Simulated Microcalcifications in Full-Field Digital Mammography, Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, and Synthetically Reconstructed 2-Dimensional Images Performed With 2 Different Digital X-ray Mammography Systems.
Peters S; Hellmich M; Stork A; Kemper J; Grinstein O; Püsken M; Stahlhut L; Kinner S; Maintz D; Krug KB
Invest Radiol; 2017 Apr; 52(4):206-215. PubMed ID: 27861206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can digital breast tomosynthesis perform better than standard digital mammography work-up in breast cancer assessment clinic?
Mall S; Noakes J; Kossoff M; Lee W; McKessar M; Goy A; Duncombe J; Roberts M; Giuffre B; Miller A; Bhola N; Kapoor C; Shearman C; DaCosta G; Choi S; Sterba J; Kay M; Bruderlin K; Winarta N; Donohue K; Macdonell-Scott B; Klijnsma F; Suzuki K; Brennan P; Mello-Thoms C
Eur Radiol; 2018 Dec; 28(12):5182-5194. PubMed ID: 29846804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection.
Kim ST; Kim DH; Ro YM
Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
