These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3737993)

  • 21. [Film-screen combinations in mammography].
    Friedrich M
    Z Lymphol; 1983 Dec; 7(2):92-103. PubMed ID: 6673399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [X-ray phase imaging using a X-ray tube with a small focal spot -improvement of image quality in mammography-].
    Honda C; Ohara H; Ishisaka A; Shimada F; Endo T
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 12766293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monte Carlo studies on the influence of focal spot size and intensity distribution on spatial resolution in magnification mammography.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(5):1369-84. PubMed ID: 18296767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of breast thickness and lesion location on resolution in digital magnification mammography.
    Park HS; Oh Y; Kim ST; Kim HJ
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):255-62. PubMed ID: 22726961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of conventional mammographic magnification, ultra high magnification and industrial magnification radiography in the radiographic detection of microcalcifications within core biopsies of the breast.
    Moritz JD; Luftner-Nagel S; Westerhof JP; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Br J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 70(839):1099-103. PubMed ID: 9536898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Direct digital magnification mammography with a large-surface detector made of amorphous silicon].
    Hermann KP; Hundertmark C; Funke M; von Brenndorff A; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1999 May; 170(5):503-6. PubMed ID: 10370416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Magnification mammography using 0.1 mm microfocus. Comparison of grid and spot-view magnification].
    Teubner J; Lenk JZ; Wentz KU; Georgi M
    Radiologe; 1987 Apr; 27(4):155-64. PubMed ID: 3037589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimal technique factors for magnification mammography.
    Huda W; Steinbach BG; Geiser WR; Belden CJ
    Invest Radiol; 1997 Jul; 32(7):378-81. PubMed ID: 9228602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Focal spot size and scatter suppression in magnification mammography.
    Muntz EP; Logan WW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1979 Sep; 133(3):453-9. PubMed ID: 111504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Focal spot sizes and the geometric unsharpness of mammographic equipment].
    Küchler M; Friedrich M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 Jul; 2(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 1504119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of focal spot size on image resolution and test phantom scores in mammography.
    Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1993 May; 66(785):441-6. PubMed ID: 8319066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Detection of subtle microcalcifications: comparison of computed radiography and screen-film mammography.
    Higashida Y; Moribe N; Morita K; Katsuda N; Hatemura M; Takada T; Takahashi M; Yamashita J
    Radiology; 1992 May; 183(2):483-6. PubMed ID: 1561354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Value of direct radiographic enlargement (DIMA) in early detection of rheumatic inflammatory lesions. Comparative evaluation with high resolution conventional imaging technique].
    Link TM; Fiebich M; Gaubitz M; Krause F; Vestring T; Schneider M; Peters PE
    Radiologe; 1994 Jul; 34(7):405-10. PubMed ID: 7938489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [A new specimen radiography device with a maximum 20-fold magnification for breast diagnosis].
    Moritz JD; Westerhof JP; Funke M; Breiter N; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1998 Feb; 168(2):133-8. PubMed ID: 9519044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Magnification mammography: evaluation of screen-film and xeroradiographic techniques.
    Haus AG; Paulus DD; Dodd GD; Cowart RW; Bencomo J
    Radiology; 1979 Oct; 133(1):223-6. PubMed ID: 472295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Digital spot mammography using an add-on upright unit: diagnostic application in daily practice.
    Mesurolle B; Mignon F; Ariche-Cohen M; Kao E; Gagnon JH; Goumot PA
    Eur J Radiol; 2004 Jul; 51(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 15186886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Image quality in mammography with special reference to anti-scatter grids and the magnification technique.
    Nielsen B; Fagerberg G
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1986; 27(4):467-79. PubMed ID: 3776678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A formal study of lateral magnification and its influence on mammographic imaging sharpness.
    Schiabel H; Ventura A; Frère AF
    Med Phys; 1994 Feb; 21(2):271-6. PubMed ID: 8177160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Focal-spot measurement: comparison of slit, pinhole, and star resolution pattern techniques.
    Everson JD; Gray JE
    Radiology; 1987 Oct; 165(1):261-4. PubMed ID: 3628780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mammographic dual-screen-dual-emulsion-film combination: visibility of simulated microcalcifications and effect on image contrast.
    Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Roe D; Orr J
    Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 3310091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.