These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37380100)

  • 1. Magnetic stimulation and the control of electromagnetic fields at work act (2016): an update.
    Goodall S; Ansdell P; Thomas K; Howatson G
    Brain Stimul; 2023; 16(4):1097-1098. PubMed ID: 37380100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deep brain stimulation and electromagnetic interference.
    Rahimpour S; Kiyani M; Hodges SE; Turner DA
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 203():106577. PubMed ID: 33662743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling of electromagnetic stimulation of the human brain.
    Lazutkin D; Husar P
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():581-4. PubMed ID: 21095888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EMvelop stimulation: minimally invasive deep brain stimulation using temporally interfering electromagnetic waves.
    Ahsan F; Chi T; Cho R; Sheth SA; Goodman W; Aazhang B
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Jul; 19(4):. PubMed ID: 35700717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modulation without surgical intervention.
    Grossman N
    Science; 2018 Aug; 361(6401):461-462. PubMed ID: 30072531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Waving Hello to Noninvasive Deep-Brain Stimulation.
    Lozano AM
    N Engl J Med; 2017 Sep; 377(11):1096-1098. PubMed ID: 28902594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calculating the induced electromagnetic fields in real human head by deep transcranial magnetic stimulation.
    Lu M; Ueno S
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():795-8. PubMed ID: 24109807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The epigenetic component of the brain response to electromagnetic stimulation in Parkinson's Disease patients: A literature overview.
    Consales C; Merla C; Marino C; Benassi B
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2018 Jan; 39(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 28990199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of deep brain regions: evidence for efficacy of the H-coil.
    Zangen A; Roth Y; Voller B; Hallett M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Apr; 116(4):775-9. PubMed ID: 15792886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The 'virtual DBS population': five realistic computational models of deep brain stimulation patients for electromagnetic MR safety studies.
    Guerin B; Iacono MI; Davids M; Dougherty D; Angelone LM; Wald LL
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Feb; 64(3):035021. PubMed ID: 30625451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling the field distribution in deep brain stimulation: the influence of anisotropy of brain tissue.
    Schmidt C; van Rienen U
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Jun; 59(6):1583-92. PubMed ID: 22410323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of electromagnetic incompatibility concerns for deep brain stimulators.
    Dustin K
    J Neurosci Nurs; 2008 Oct; 40(5):299-303, 319. PubMed ID: 18856251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computationally efficient simulation of electrical activity at cell membranes interacting with self-generated and externally imposed electric fields.
    Agudelo-Toro A; Neef A
    J Neural Eng; 2013 Apr; 10(2):026019. PubMed ID: 23503026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biological effects of weak electromagnetic fields from 0 Hz to 200 MHz: a survey of the literature with special emphasis on possible magnetic resonance effects.
    Beers GJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1989; 7(3):309-31. PubMed ID: 2668675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Special aspects of patient care after implantation of deep-brain-stimulator].
    Kovács N; Balás I; Janszky J; Aschermann Z; Nagy F; Dóczi T; Komoly S
    Ideggyogy Sz; 2008 Jan; 61(1-2):4-15. PubMed ID: 18372770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and testing of implanted carbon electrodes for electromagnetic field mapping during neuromodulation.
    Ashok Kumar N; Chauhan M; Kandala SK; Sohn SM; Sadleir RJ
    Magn Reson Med; 2020 Oct; 84(4):2103-2116. PubMed ID: 32301176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of a second deep TMS in depression: a brief report.
    Rosenberg O; Isserles M; Levkovitz Y; Kotler M; Zangen A; Dannon PN
    Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry; 2011 Jun; 35(4):1041-4. PubMed ID: 21354242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finite difference time domain (FDTD) modeling of implanted deep brain stimulation electrodes and brain tissue.
    Gabran SR; Saad JH; Salama MM; Mansour RR
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():6485-8. PubMed ID: 19964439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulation of phagocytosis and free radical production in murine macrophages by 50 Hz electromagnetic fields.
    Simkó M; Droste S; Kriehuber R; Weiss DG
    Eur J Cell Biol; 2001 Aug; 80(8):562-6. PubMed ID: 11561907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bio-heat transfer model of deep brain stimulation-induced temperature changes.
    Elwassif MM; Kong Q; Vazquez M; Bikson M
    J Neural Eng; 2006 Dec; 3(4):306-15. PubMed ID: 17124335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.