150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37380148)
1. Deep Learning-Based Image Noise Quantification Framework for Computed Tomography.
Huber NR; Kim J; Leng S; McCollough CH; Yu L
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 47(4):603-607. PubMed ID: 37380148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technical note: Phantom-based training framework for convolutional neural network CT noise reduction.
Huber NR; Missert AD; Gong H; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):821-830. PubMed ID: 36385704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic chest computed tomography image noise quantification using deep learning.
Ketola JHJ; Inkinen SI; Mäkelä T; Kaasalainen T; Peltonen JI; Kangasniemi M; Volmonen K; Kortesniemi M
Phys Med; 2024 Jan; 117():103186. PubMed ID: 38042062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automatic head computed tomography image noise quantification with deep learning.
Inkinen SI; Mäkelä T; Kaasalainen T; Peltonen J; Kangasniemi M; Kortesniemi M
Phys Med; 2022 Jul; 99():102-112. PubMed ID: 35671678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pixel-wise estimation of noise statistics on iterative CT reconstruction from a single scan.
Wang T; Zhu L
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3525-3533. PubMed ID: 28444799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Projection-domain scatter correction for cone beam computed tomography using a residual convolutional neural network.
Nomura Y; Xu Q; Shirato H; Shimizu S; Xing L
Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):3142-3155. PubMed ID: 31077390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of a deep learning-based CT image denoising method: Generalizability over dose, reconstruction kernel, and slice thickness.
Zeng R; Lin CY; Li Q; Jiang L; Skopec M; Fessler JA; Myers KJ
Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):836-853. PubMed ID: 34954845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Deep-learning-based direct inversion for material decomposition.
Gong H; Tao S; Rajendran K; Zhou W; McCollough CH; Leng S
Med Phys; 2020 Dec; 47(12):6294-6309. PubMed ID: 33020942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noise suppression for dual-energy CT via penalized weighted least-square optimization with similarity-based regularization.
Harms J; Wang T; Petrongolo M; Niu T; Zhu L
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2676. PubMed ID: 27147376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A quality-checked and physics-constrained deep learning method to estimate material basis images from single-kV contrast-enhanced chest CT scans.
Li Y; Tie X; Li K; Zhang R; Qi Z; Budde A; Grist TM; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2023 Jun; 50(6):3368-3388. PubMed ID: 36908250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deep learning enabled ultra-fast-pitch acquisition in clinical X-ray computed tomography.
Gong H; Ren L; Hsieh SS; McCollough CH; Yu L
Med Phys; 2021 Oct; 48(10):5712-5726. PubMed ID: 34415068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Deep learning for x-ray scatter correction in dedicated breast CT.
Pautasso JJ; Caballo M; Mikerov M; Boone JM; Michielsen K; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2023 Apr; 50(4):2022-2036. PubMed ID: 36565012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deep learning approaches using 2D and 3D convolutional neural networks for generating male pelvic synthetic computed tomography from magnetic resonance imaging.
Fu J; Yang Y; Singhrao K; Ruan D; Chu FI; Low DA; Lewis JH
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3788-3798. PubMed ID: 31220353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A deep neural network for fast and accurate scatter estimation in quantitative SPECT/CT under challenging scatter conditions.
Xiang H; Lim H; Fessler JA; Dewaraja YK
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2020 Dec; 47(13):2956-2967. PubMed ID: 32415551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating medical images using deep convolutional neural networks: A simulated CT phantom image study.
Hayashi N; Maruyama T; Sato Y; Watanabe H; Ogura T; Ogura A
Technol Health Care; 2020; 28(2):113-120. PubMed ID: 31156187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative assessment of noise properties for two deep learning CT image reconstruction techniques and filtered back projection.
Kawashima H; Ichikawa K; Takata T; Seto I
Med Phys; 2022 Oct; 49(10):6359-6367. PubMed ID: 36047991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calibrated uncertainty estimation for interpretable proton computed tomography image correction using Bayesian deep learning.
Nomura Y; Tanaka S; Wang J; Shirato H; Shimizu S; Xing L
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Mar; 66(6):065029. PubMed ID: 33626513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A performance comparison of convolutional neural network-based image denoising methods: The effect of loss functions on low-dose CT images.
Kim B; Han M; Shim H; Baek J
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3906-3923. PubMed ID: 31306488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shading artifact correction in breast CT using an interleaved deep learning segmentation and maximum-likelihood polynomial fitting approach.
Ghazi P; Hernandez AM; Abbey C; Yang K; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3414-3430. PubMed ID: 31102462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
