These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Characteristics and outcome in cardiogenic shock according to vascular access site for percutaneous coronary intervention. Peters EJ; Bogerd M; Ten Berg S; Timmermans MJC; Engström AE; Thiele H; Jung C; Schrage B; Sjauw KD; Verouden NJW; Teeuwen K; Dedic A; Meuwissen M; Danse PW; Claessen BEPM; Henriques JPS; Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2024 Aug; 13(8):615-623. PubMed ID: 38920350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Arterial access site utilization in cardiogenic shock in the United Kingdom: is radial access feasible? Mamas MA; Anderson SG; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; Buchan I; de Belder MA; Ludman P; Nolan J; ; Am Heart J; 2014 Jun; 167(6):900-8.e1. PubMed ID: 24890541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the CathPCI Registry. Wayangankar SA; Bangalore S; McCoy LA; Jneid H; Latif F; Karrowni W; Charitakis K; Feldman DN; Dakik HA; Mauri L; Peterson ED; Messenger J; Roe M; Mukherjee D; Klein A JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 9(4):341-351. PubMed ID: 26803418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice? Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J; JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ahsan MJ; Ahmad S; Latif A; Lateef N; Ahsan MZ; Abusnina W; Nathan S; Altin SE; Kolte DS; Messenger JC; Tannenbaum M; Goldsweig AM Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 2022 Sep; 8(6):640-650. PubMed ID: 35460230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radial versus femoral artery access for percutaneous coronary artery intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease complicated by cardiogenic shock: Subanalysis from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial. Guedeney P; Thiele H; Kerneis M; Barthélémy O; Baumann S; Sandri M; de Waha-Thiele S; Fuernau G; Rouanet S; Piek JJ; Landmesser U; Hauguel-Moreau M; Zeitouni M; Silvain J; Lattuca B; Windecker S; Collet JP; Desch S; Zeymer U; Montalescot G; Akin I; Am Heart J; 2020 Jul; 225():60-68. PubMed ID: 32497906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variation in the Adoption of Transradial Access for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the NCDR CathPCI Registry. Valle JA; Kaltenbach LA; Bradley SM; Yeh RW; Rao SV; Gurm HS; Armstrong EJ; Messenger JC; Waldo SW JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 10(22):2242-2254. PubMed ID: 29102582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock. Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock: A radial-first centre experience and meta-analysis of published studies. Roule V; Lemaitre A; Sabatier R; Lognoné T; Dahdouh Z; Berger L; Milliez P; Grollier G; Montalescot G; Beygui F Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2015 Nov; 108(11):563-75. PubMed ID: 26365478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of Access Site Practice on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Thrombolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United Kingdom: An Insight From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Dataset. Rashid M; Rushton CA; Kwok CS; Kinnaird T; Kontopantelis E; Olier I; Ludman P; De Belder MA; Nolan J; Mamas MA JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 10(22):2258-2265. PubMed ID: 29169494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Timing of mechanical circulatory support during primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Archilletti F; Giuliani L; Dangas GD; Ricci F; Benedetto U; Radico F; Gallina S; Rossi S; Maddestra N; Zimarino M Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Mar; 99(4):998-1005. PubMed ID: 35182020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contemporary incidence, predictors, and outcomes of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the NCDR Cath-PCI registry. Tsai TT; Patel UD; Chang TI; Kennedy KF; Masoudi FA; Matheny ME; Kosiborod M; Amin AP; Messenger JC; Rumsfeld JS; Spertus JA JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 24456715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transradial versus transfemoral coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: is transradial coronary intervention suitable for emergency PCI in high-risk acute myocardial infarction? Iga A; Wagatsuma K; Yamazaki J; Ikeda T J Invasive Cardiol; 2014 May; 26(5):196-202. PubMed ID: 24791717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of short- and medium-term clinical outcomes between transradial approach and transfemoral approach in a high-volume PCI heart center in China. He P; Yang Y; Qiao S; Xu B; Yao M; Wu Y; Yuan J; Chen J; Liu H; Dai J; Yang X; Tang X; Wang Y; Li W; Gao R PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118491. PubMed ID: 25826213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]