These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37380757)

  • 1. Size matters: characterizing penile augmentation content from the 100 most popular YouTube videos.
    Seranio N; Muncey W; Cox S; Belladelli F; Del Giudice F; Glover F; Eisenberg ML
    Int J Impot Res; 2024 Aug; 36(5):493-497. PubMed ID: 37380757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A quality analysis of nocturnal enuresis videos on YouTube.
    Toprak T; Tokat E
    J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Aug; 17(4):449.e1-449.e6. PubMed ID: 33824069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is social media reliable as a source of information on Peyronie's disease treatment?
    Baydilli N; Selvi I
    Int J Impot Res; 2022 Apr; 34(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 34172941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of videos about vesicoureteral reflux on YouTube.
    Toksoz A; Duran MB
    J Pediatr Urol; 2021 Dec; 17(6):858.e1-858.e6. PubMed ID: 34756784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality analysis of testicular cancer videos on YouTube.
    Duran MB; Kizilkan Y
    Andrologia; 2021 Sep; 53(8):e14118. PubMed ID: 34009641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. YouTube videos as a source of information concerning Behçet's disease: a reliability and quality analysis.
    Karakoyun A; Yildirim A
    Rheumatol Int; 2021 Dec; 41(12):2117-2123. PubMed ID: 34590188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.
    Zhang X; Yang Y; Shen YW; Zhang KR; Ma LT; Ding C; Wang BY; Meng Y; Liu H
    Front Public Health; 2022; 10():972348. PubMed ID: 36211682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fiction, Falsehoods, and Few Facts: Cross-Sectional Study on the Content-Related Quality of Atopic Eczema-Related Videos on YouTube.
    Mueller SM; Hongler VNS; Jungo P; Cajacob L; Schwegler S; Steveling EH; Manjaly Thomas ZR; Fuchs O; Navarini A; Scherer K; Brandt O
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Apr; 22(4):e15599. PubMed ID: 32329744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. YouTube is inadequate as an information source on delayed ejaculation.
    Toprak T; Yilmaz M; Ramazanoglu MA; Verit A; Schlager D; Miernik A
    Int J Impot Res; 2023 Jun; 35(4):392-397. PubMed ID: 35318458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. YouTube Videos as a Source of Misinformation on Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
    Goobie GC; Guler SA; Johannson KA; Fisher JH; Ryerson CJ
    Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2019 May; 16(5):572-579. PubMed ID: 30608877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the usage of YouTube videos about Histology and Embryology as an educational material.
    Cetinavci D; Yasar V; Yucel A; Elbe H
    Anat Histol Embryol; 2022 Nov; 51(6):810-817. PubMed ID: 36081400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.
    Ferhatoglu MF; Kartal A; Ekici U; Gurkan A
    Obes Surg; 2019 May; 29(5):1477-1484. PubMed ID: 30706318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the scientific quality and reliability of YouTube videos about chemotherapy.
    Sahin E; Seyyar M
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Nov; 102(45):e35916. PubMed ID: 37960752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of Video Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos Regarding Meniscus Tear Rehabilitation.
    Abed V; Ray M; Smathers J; Stone AV
    Cureus; 2023 Mar; 15(3):e36299. PubMed ID: 37077591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. YouTube videos in Japanese as a source of information on nocturnal enuresis: A content-quality and reliability analysis.
    Nishizaki N; Hirano D; Oishi K; Shimizu T
    Pediatr Int; 2022 Jan; 64(1):e15049. PubMed ID: 34747553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. YouTube as a source of information for water treatments.
    Güneri FD; Forestier FBE; Forestier RJ; Karaarslan F; Odabaşi E
    Int J Biometeorol; 2022 Apr; 66(4):781-789. PubMed ID: 35094110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of Reliability and Quality of Videos on Medial Epicondylitis Shared on YouTube.
    Uzun O
    Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e37250. PubMed ID: 37168186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. YouTube as a Source of Information for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke: A Quality, Reliability and Accuracy Analysis.
    Askin A; Sengul L; Tosun A
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2020 Dec; 29(12):105309. PubMed ID: 32992187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos as a Source of Public Health Information Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination: Cross-sectional Study.
    Chan C; Sounderajah V; Daniels E; Acharya A; Clarke J; Yalamanchili S; Normahani P; Markar S; Ashrafian H; Darzi A
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2021 Jul; 7(7):e29942. PubMed ID: 34081599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is the information about orthodontics on Youtube and TikTok reliable for the oral health of the public? A cross sectional comparative study.
    Kılınç DD
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 123(5):e349-e354. PubMed ID: 35470122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.