119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37380863)
1. Asymmetric impact of technological innovation, foreign direct investment and agricultural production on environmental degradation: evidence from Pakistan.
Chen Y; Raza K
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Aug; 30(36):85237-85248. PubMed ID: 37380863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of financial development, foreign direct investment inflow, innovation in environmental degradation in Pakistan with dynamic ARDL simulation model.
Jan A; Xin-Gang Z; Babar SF; Khan MK
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Apr; 30(17):49381-49396. PubMed ID: 36773260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determinants of the CO
Ali Z; Jianzhou Y; Ali A; Hussain J
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(22):61945-61964. PubMed ID: 36934182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Energy consumption, CO
Akhtar R; Masud MM; Al-Mamun A; Saif ANM
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 May; 30(22):63096-63108. PubMed ID: 36952165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Asymmetric effects of premature deagriculturalization on economic growth and CO
Ullah S; Ahmad W; Majeed MT; Sohail S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec; 28(47):66772-66786. PubMed ID: 34236608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An asymmetrical analysis to explore the dynamic impacts of CO
Rehman A; Ma H; Ahmad M; Ozturk I; Işık C
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Oct; 28(38):53520-53532. PubMed ID: 34031838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The asymmetric influence of environmental-related technological innovation on climate change mitigation: what role do FDI and renewable energy play?
Rej S; Bandyopadhyay A; Das N; Hossain ME; Islam MS; Bera P; Yeediballi T
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(6):14916-14931. PubMed ID: 36161560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Asymmetric nexus between technological innovation and environmental degradation in Sweden: an aggregated and disaggregated analysis.
Adebayo TS; Oladipupo SD; Kirikkaleli D; Adeshola I
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(24):36547-36564. PubMed ID: 35064482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of FDI, technological innovation, and financial development on CO
Rafique MZ; Li Y; Larik AR; Monaheng MP
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jul; 27(19):23899-23913. PubMed ID: 32301083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unveiling the asymmetric impact of energy consumption on environmental mitigation in the manufacturing sector of Pakistan.
Tanveer A; Song H; Faheem M; Daud A; Naseer S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Dec; 28(45):64586-64605. PubMed ID: 34318417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploring the asymmetric effects of renewable energy production, natural resources, and economic progress on CO
Iqbal S; Wang Y; Shaikh PA; Maqbool A; Hayat K
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(5):7067-7078. PubMed ID: 34463924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of technological innovation, FDI, and financial development on CO2 emission: evidence from the G8 countries.
Abid A; Mehmood U; Tariq S; Haq ZU
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Feb; 29(8):11654-11662. PubMed ID: 34545519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Asymmetric effect of FDI and public expenditure on population health: new evidence from Pakistan based on non-linear ARDL.
Rahman SU; Chaudhry IS; Meo MS; Sheikh SM; Idrees S
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(16):23871-23886. PubMed ID: 34817814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The asymmetric effect of technology shocks on CO2 emissions: a panel analysis of BRICS economies.
Chen J; Yang F; Liu Y; Usman A
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Apr; 29(18):27115-27123. PubMed ID: 34981400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Asymmetric relationship of environmental degradation and economic growth with tourism demand in Pakistan: evidence from non-linear ARDL and causality estimation.
Amir M; Siddique M; Ali K; Bukhari AAA; Kausar N
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jan; 29(4):5891-5901. PubMed ID: 34427885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of public-private partnerships investment in energy and technological innovations in driving climate change: evidence from Brazil.
Ahmad M; Raza MY
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Aug; 27(24):30638-30648. PubMed ID: 32468376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does energy use and economic growth allow for environmental sustainability? An empirical analysis of Pakistan.
Mohsin M; Naseem S; Sarfraz M; Zia-Ur-Rehman M; Baig SA
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jul; 29(35):52873-52884. PubMed ID: 35277816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Foreign investment and CO2 emissions: do technological innovation and institutional quality matter? Evidence from system GMM approach.
Bakhsh S; Yin H; Shabir M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(15):19424-19438. PubMed ID: 33392988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Examining the asymmetric effects of Pakistan's fiscal decentralization on economic growth and environmental quality.
Li X; Younas MZ; Andlib Z; Ullah S; Sohail S; Hafeez M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Feb; 28(5):5666-5681. PubMed ID: 32974818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship between inward FDI and environmental degradation for Pakistan: an exploration of pollution haven hypothesis through ARDL approach.
Nadeem AM; Ali T; Khan MTI; Guo Z
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 May; 27(13):15407-15425. PubMed ID: 32072420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
