These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37381677)

  • 1. Characteristics of intraoral scan bodies and their influence on impression accuracy: A systematic review.
    Pachiou A; Zervou E; Tsirogiannis P; Sykaras N; Tortopidis D; Kourtis S
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2023 Dec; 35(8):1205-1217. PubMed ID: 37381677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review.
    Mizumoto RM; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):343-352. PubMed ID: 29627211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of implant scan body design (height, diameter, geometry, material, and retention system) on intraoral scanning accuracy: A systematic review.
    Gómez-Polo M; Donmez MB; Çakmak G; Yilmaz B; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):165-180. PubMed ID: 37771200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses.
    Mizumoto RM; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy EA; Seidt J; Johnston WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31040026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Implant ScanBody Material and Intraoral Scanners on the Accuracy of Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impressions.
    Azevedo L; Marques T; Karasan D; Fehmer V; Sailer I; Correia A; Gómez Polo M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Sep; 37(5):575-582. PubMed ID: 37729480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital Impressions in Implant Dentistry: A Literature Review.
    Marques S; Ribeiro P; Falcão C; Lemos BF; Ríos-Carrasco B; Ríos-Santos JV; Herrero-Climent M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 33498902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of implant scan body geometric modifications on the trueness and scanning time of complete arch intraoral implant digital scans: An in vitro study.
    Lawand G; Ismail Y; Revilla-León M; Tohme H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1189-1197. PubMed ID: 35864021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions when Using and Varying the Material and Diameter of the Dental Implant Scan Bodies.
    Althubaitiy R; Sambrook R; Weisbloom M; Petridis H
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2022 Nov; 30(4):305-313. PubMed ID: 35438267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of full-arch digital implant impressions taken using intraoral scanners and related variables: A systematic review.
    Zhang YJ; Shi JY; Qian SJ; Qiao SC; Lai HC
    Int J Oral Implantol (Berl); 2021 May; 14(2):157-179. PubMed ID: 34006079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The direct digital workflow in fixed implant prosthodontics: a narrative review.
    Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Kamposiora P; Papavasiliou G; Özcan M
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jan; 21(1):37. PubMed ID: 33478459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Influence of Using Different Types of Scan Bodies on the Transfer Accuracy of Implant Position: An In Vitro Study.
    Schmidt A; Billig JW; Schlenz MA; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(2):254-260. PubMed ID: 33882570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Digital assessment of the accuracy of implant impression techniques in free end saddle partially edentulous patients. A controlled clinical trial.
    Dohiem MM; Abdelaziz MS; Abdalla MF; Fawzy AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Nov; 22(1):486. PubMed ID: 36371189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study.
    Ma B; Yue X; Sun Y; Peng L; Geng W
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):636. PubMed ID: 34893053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of implant scanbody material, position and operator on the accuracy of digital impression for complete-arch: A randomized in vitro trial.
    Arcuri L; Pozzi A; Lio F; Rompen E; Zechner W; Nardi A
    J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Apr; 64(2):128-136. PubMed ID: 31255546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Flügge T; van der Meer WJ; Gonzalez BG; Vach K; Wismeijer D; Wang P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():374-392. PubMed ID: 30328182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impact of Different Scan Bodies and Scan Strategies on the Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions Assessed with an Intraoral Scanner: An In Vitro Study.
    Motel C; Kirchner E; Adler W; Wichmann M; Matta RE
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):309-314. PubMed ID: 31802574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanbodies on Implant Position: Differences in Manufacturing Tolerances.
    Schmidt A; Billig JW; Schlenz MA; Rehmann P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(5):430-432. PubMed ID: 31486814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraoral digital implant scans: Parameters to improve accuracy.
    Revilla-León M; Lanis A; Yilmaz B; Kois JC; Gallucci GO
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Dec; 32(S2):150-164. PubMed ID: 37586762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the implant scan body bevel location, implant angulation and position on intraoral scanning accuracy: An in vitro study.
    Gómez-Polo M; Álvarez F; Ortega R; Gómez-Polo C; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Dent; 2022 Jun; 121():104122. PubMed ID: 35395345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between stereophotogrammetric, digital, and conventional impression techniques in implant-supported fixed complete arch prostheses: An in vitro study.
    Tohme H; Lawand G; Chmielewska M; Makhzoume J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 129(2):354-362. PubMed ID: 34112521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.