These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting. Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy). Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M; Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Prolonged cecal insertion time is associated with decreased adenoma detection. von Renteln D; Robertson DJ; Bensen S; Pohl H Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Mar; 85(3):574-580. PubMed ID: 27590962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Application of artificial intelligence in colorectal cancer screening by colonoscopy: Future prospects (Review). Ding M; Yan J; Chao G; Zhang S Oncol Rep; 2023 Nov; 50(5):. PubMed ID: 37772392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Associations between endoscopist feedback and improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bishay K; Causada-Calo N; Scaffidi MA; Walsh CM; Anderson JT; Rostom A; Dube C; Keswani RN; Heitman SJ; Hilsden RJ; Shorr R; Grover SC; Forbes N Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Nov; 92(5):1030-1040.e9. PubMed ID: 32330506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening: an evidence-based analysis. Medical Advisory Secretariat Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2009; 9(10):1-40. PubMed ID: 23074514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Can colonoscopy remain cost-effective for colorectal cancer screening? The impact of practice patterns and the Will Rogers phenomenon on costs. Austin GL; Fennimore B; Ahnen DJ Am J Gastroenterol; 2013 Mar; 108(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 23208273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The Relationship between Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer and Quality Indicators of Colonoscopy: The Latest Single-center Cohort Study with a Review of the Literature. Yamaguchi H; Fukuzawa M; Minami H; Ichimiya T; Takahashi H; Matsue Y; Honjo M; Hirayama Y; Nutahara D; Taira J; Nakamura H; Kawai T; Itoi T Intern Med; 2020; 59(12):1481-1488. PubMed ID: 32536675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. Kaminski MF; Regula J; Kraszewska E; Polkowski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Zwierko M; Rupinski M; Nowacki MP; Butruk E N Engl J Med; 2010 May; 362(19):1795-803. PubMed ID: 20463339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. AGA White Paper: Challenges and Gaps in Innovation for the Performance of Colonoscopy for Screening and Surveillance of Colorectal Cancer. Komanduri S; Dominitz JA; Rabeneck L; Kahi C; Ladabaum U; Imperiale TF; Byrne MF; Lee JK; Lieberman D; Wang AY; Sultan S; Shaukat A; Pohl H; Muthusamy VR Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Oct; 20(10):2198-2209.e3. PubMed ID: 35688352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Proposal of high-risk adenoma detection rate as an impactful, complementary quality indicator of colonoscopy. Wadhwa V; Jobanputra Y; Al Taii H; Thota PN; Lopez R; Gurudu SR; Sanaka MR Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):325-331. PubMed ID: 30927122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Efficacy of Real-Time Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Neoplasia in a Randomized Trial. Repici A; Badalamenti M; Maselli R; Correale L; Radaelli F; Rondonotti E; Ferrara E; Spadaccini M; Alkandari A; Fugazza A; Anderloni A; Galtieri PA; Pellegatta G; Carrara S; Di Leo M; Craviotto V; Lamonaca L; Lorenzetti R; Andrealli A; Antonelli G; Wallace M; Sharma P; Rosch T; Hassan C Gastroenterology; 2020 Aug; 159(2):512-520.e7. PubMed ID: 32371116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Public reporting of colonoscopy quality is associated with an increase in endoscopist adenoma detection rate. Abdul-Baki H; Schoen RE; Dean K; Rose S; Leffler DA; Kuganeswaran E; Morris M; Carrell D; Mehrotra A Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Oct; 82(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 26385276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Assessing screening quality in the CDC's Colorectal Cancer Screening Demonstration Program. Nadel MR; Royalty J; Shapiro JA; Joseph D; Seeff LC; Lane DS; Dwyer DM Cancer; 2013 Aug; 119 Suppl 15(0 15):2834-41. PubMed ID: 23868477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Does Increased Adenoma Detection Reduce the Risk of Colorectal Cancer, and How Good Do We Need to Be? Dilly CK; Kahi CJ Curr Gastroenterol Rep; 2019 Feb; 21(4):9. PubMed ID: 30815756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Current status and future perspective on artificial intelligence for lower endoscopy. Misawa M; Kudo SE; Mori Y; Maeda Y; Ogawa Y; Ichimasa K; Kudo T; Wakamura K; Hayashi T; Miyachi H; Baba T; Ishida F; Itoh H; Oda M; Mori K Dig Endosc; 2021 Jan; 33(2):273-284. PubMed ID: 32969051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [High quality colonoscopy must be secured]. Thorlacius H; Wurm Johansson G; Nemeth A; Toth E Lakartidningen; 2017 May; 114():. PubMed ID: 28510243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Colorectal Cancer Screening Recommendations and Outcomes in Lynch Syndrome. Drogan C; Kupfer SS Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am; 2022 Jan; 32(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 34798987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]