These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37382107)

  • 1. Are lexical representations graded or discrete?
    Li L; Buxó-Lugo A; Jacobs CL; Slevc LR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 May; 77(5):909-923. PubMed ID: 37382107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Of Papers and Pens: Polysemes and Homophones in Lexical (mis)Selection.
    Li L; Slevc LR
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6():1532-1548. PubMed ID: 27471136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Probing Lexical Ambiguity: Word Vectors Encode Number and Relatedness of Senses.
    Beekhuizen B; Armstrong BC; Stevenson S
    Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 45(5):e12943. PubMed ID: 34018227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sustained meaning activation for polysemous but not homonymous words: evidence from EEG.
    MacGregor LJ; Bouwsema J; Klepousniotou E
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():126-38. PubMed ID: 25576909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the lexical representation(s) of compounds: A continuous picture naming study.
    Döring AL; Abdel Rahman R; Zwitserlood P; Lorenz A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jan; 48(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 34570547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lexical access in semantic variant PPA: Evidence for a post-semantic contribution to naming deficits.
    Wilson SM; Dehollain C; Ferrieux S; Christensen LEH; Teichmann M
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():90-99. PubMed ID: 28867555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Processing of irregular polysemes in sentence reading.
    Brocher A; Foraker S; Koenig JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1798-1813. PubMed ID: 27065198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Listening to Puns Elicits the Co-Activation of Alternative Homophone Meanings during Language Production.
    Rose SB; Spalek K; Abdel Rahman R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130853. PubMed ID: 26114942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Word frequency has similar effects in picture naming and gender decision: A failure to replicate Jescheniak and Levelt (1994).
    Corps RE; Meyer AS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Nov; 241():104073. PubMed ID: 37948879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonological influences on lexical (mis)selection.
    Ferreira VS; Griffin ZM
    Psychol Sci; 2003 Jan; 14(1):86-90. PubMed ID: 12564760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Word Senses as Clusters of Meaning Modulations: A Computational Model of Polysemy.
    Li J; Joanisse MF
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 45(4):e12955. PubMed ID: 33873247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Opposing effects of semantic diversity in lexical and semantic relatedness decisions.
    Hoffman P; Woollams AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):385-402. PubMed ID: 25751041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pupillometric and behavioural evidence shows no differences between polyseme and homonym processing.
    Haro J; López-Cortés N; Ferré P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2023 Aug; 238():103985. PubMed ID: 37453281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metaphor Is Between Metonymy and Homonymy: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials.
    Yurchenko A; Lopukhina A; Dragoy O
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2113. PubMed ID: 32982863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probing the Representational Structure of Regular Polysemy via Sense Analogy Questions: Insights from Contextual Word Vectors.
    Li J; Armstrong BC
    Cogn Sci; 2024 Mar; 48(3):e13416. PubMed ID: 38482721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re-visiting "semantic facilitation" of word retrieval for people with aphasia: facilitation yes but semantic no.
    Howard D; Hickin J; Redmond T; Clark P; Best W
    Cortex; 2006 Aug; 42(6):946-62. PubMed ID: 17131601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is there semantic interference in delayed naming?
    Mädebach A; Oppermann F; Hantsch A; Curda C; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):522-38. PubMed ID: 21299323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Word naming slows picture naming but does not affect cumulative semantic interference.
    Vitkovitch M; Batool Ghadiri T; Hersi F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Apr; 195():30-38. PubMed ID: 30870743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The dissociation between age of acquisition and word frequency effects in Chinese spoken picture naming.
    Zhang Q; Zhou Y; Lou H
    Psychol Res; 2022 Sep; 86(6):1918-1929. PubMed ID: 34757437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Concurrent semantic priming and lexical interference for close semantic relations in blocked-cyclic picture naming: Electrophysiological signatures.
    Lin HP; Kuhlen AK; Melinger A; Aristei S; Abdel Rahman R
    Psychophysiology; 2022 Apr; 59(4):e13990. PubMed ID: 34931331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.