These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37387134)

  • 21. HiC-Hiker: a probabilistic model to determine contig orientation in chromosome-length scaffolds with Hi-C.
    Nakabayashi R; Morishita S
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 36(13):3966-3974. PubMed ID: 32369554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Benchmarking of de novo assembly algorithms for Nanopore data reveals optimal performance of OLC approaches.
    Cherukuri Y; Janga SC
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):507. PubMed ID: 27556636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A binning tool to reconstruct viral haplotypes from assembled contigs.
    Chen J; Shang J; Wang J; Sun Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 20(1):544. PubMed ID: 31684876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Classification of bacterial plasmid and chromosome derived sequences using machine learning.
    Zou X; Nguyen M; Overbeek J; Cao B; Davis JJ
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0279280. PubMed ID: 36525447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Plasmer: an Accurate and Sensitive Bacterial Plasmid Prediction Tool Based on Machine Learning of Shared k-mers and Genomic Features.
    Zhu Q; Gao S; Xiao B; He Z; Hu S
    Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0464522. PubMed ID: 37191574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Deeplasmid: deep learning accurately separates plasmids from bacterial chromosomes.
    Andreopoulos WB; Geller AM; Lucke M; Balewski J; Clum A; Ivanova NN; Levy A
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2022 Feb; 50(3):e17. PubMed ID: 34871418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Resolving plasmid structures in
    George S; Pankhurst L; Hubbard A; Votintseva A; Stoesser N; Sheppard AE; Mathers A; Norris R; Navickaite I; Eaton C; Iqbal Z; Crook DW; Phan HTT
    Microb Genom; 2017 Aug; 3(8):e000118. PubMed ID: 29026658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fragmentation and Coverage Variation in Viral Metagenome Assemblies, and Their Effect in Diversity Calculations.
    García-López R; Vázquez-Castellanos JF; Moya A
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():141. PubMed ID: 26442255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Metagenomic binning with assembly graph embeddings.
    Lamurias A; Sereika M; Albertsen M; Hose K; Nielsen TD
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 38(19):4481-4487. PubMed ID: 35972375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. CH-Bin: A convex hull based approach for binning metagenomic contigs.
    Chandrasiri S; Perera T; Dilhara A; Perera I; Mallawaarachchi V
    Comput Biol Chem; 2022 Oct; 100():107734. PubMed ID: 35964419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. 3CAC: improving the classification of phages and plasmids in metagenomic assemblies using assembly graphs.
    Pu L; Shamir R
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 38(Suppl_2):ii56-ii61. PubMed ID: 36124804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. PlasmidEC and gplas2: an optimized short-read approach to predict and reconstruct antibiotic resistance plasmids in
    Paganini JA; Kerkvliet JJ; Vader L; Plantinga NL; Meneses R; Corander J; Willems RJL; Arredondo-Alonso S; Schürch AC
    Microb Genom; 2024 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 38376388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. CoCoNet: an efficient deep learning tool for viral metagenome binning.
    Arisdakessian CG; Nigro OD; Steward GF; Poisson G; Belcaid M
    Bioinformatics; 2021 Sep; 37(18):2803-2810. PubMed ID: 33822891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. PlasClass improves plasmid sequence classification.
    Pellow D; Mizrahi I; Shamir R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Apr; 16(4):e1007781. PubMed ID: 32243433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. SCOP: a novel scaffolding algorithm based on contig classification and optimization.
    Li M; Tang L; Wu FX; Pan Y; Wang J
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Apr; 35(7):1142-1150. PubMed ID: 30184046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. PlasForest: a homology-based random forest classifier for plasmid detection in genomic datasets.
    Pradier L; Tissot T; Fiston-Lavier AS; Bedhomme S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Jun; 22(1):349. PubMed ID: 34174810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. MOB-suite: software tools for clustering, reconstruction and typing of plasmids from draft assemblies.
    Robertson J; Nash JHE
    Microb Genom; 2018 Aug; 4(8):. PubMed ID: 30052170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. SolidBin: improving metagenome binning with semi-supervised normalized cut.
    Wang Z; Wang Z; Lu YY; Sun F; Zhu S
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Nov; 35(21):4229-4238. PubMed ID: 30977806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Plasmid flux in Escherichia coli ST131 sublineages, analyzed by plasmid constellation network (PLACNET), a new method for plasmid reconstruction from whole genome sequences.
    Lanza VF; de Toro M; Garcillán-Barcia MP; Mora A; Blanco J; Coque TM; de la Cruz F
    PLoS Genet; 2014 Dec; 10(12):e1004766. PubMed ID: 25522143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. PlasmidSeeker: identification of known plasmids from bacterial whole genome sequencing reads.
    Roosaare M; Puustusmaa M; Möls M; Vaher M; Remm M
    PeerJ; 2018; 6():e4588. PubMed ID: 29629246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.