These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37388890)

  • 1. Subpectoral, Suprapectoral, and Top-of-Groove Biceps Tenodesis Procedures Lead to Similar Good Clinical Outcomes: Comparison of Biceps Tenodesis Procedures.
    Guerra JJ; Curran GC; Guerra LM
    Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil; 2023 Jun; 5(3):e663-e670. PubMed ID: 37388890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Midterm Outcomes Following Combined Biceps Tenodesis and Anterior Labral Repair in Active Duty Military Patients Younger Than 35 Years.
    Green CK; Scanaliato JP; Sandler AB; Czajkowski H; Rolf RH; Dunn JC; Parnes N
    Am J Sports Med; 2023 Jun; 51(7):1844-1851. PubMed ID: 37196664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis provided earlier shoulder function restoration compared with open subpectoral biceps tenodesis during the recovery phase.
    Ahn J; Kim JH; Shin SJ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Mar; 33(3):678-685. PubMed ID: 37572747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No Difference in Clinical Outcomes for Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis at Midterm Follow-up: A Randomized Prospective Analysis.
    Forsythe B; Berlinberg EJ; Diaz CC; Korrapati A; Agarwalla A; Patel HH; Cole BJ; Cvetanovich GL; Yanke AB; Romeo AA; Verma NN
    Am J Sports Med; 2022 May; 50(6):1486-1494. PubMed ID: 35507468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concomitant Biceps Tenodesis Does Not Portend Inferior Outcomes After Anterior Glenohumeral Stabilization.
    Green CK; Scanaliato JP; Sandler AB; Patrick CM; Dunn JC; Parnes N
    Am J Sports Med; 2023 Dec; 51(14):3851-3857. PubMed ID: 37975490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Posterior Labral Repair for Posterior Glenohumeral Instability.
    Scanaliato JP; Green CK; Sandler AB; Hurley ET; Hettrich CM; Parnes N
    Am J Sports Med; 2024 Jan; 52(1):207-214. PubMed ID: 38164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biceps Tenodesis as an Attractive Alternative to Superior Labral Anterior-Posterior (SLAP) Repair for Type II SLAP Lesions in Active-Duty Military Patients Younger Than 35 Years.
    Parnes N; Dunn JC; Czajkowski H; DeFranco MJ; Green CK; Scanaliato JP
    Am J Sports Med; 2021 Dec; 49(14):3945-3951. PubMed ID: 34672809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. All-Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Tenodesis of the Long Head of the Biceps Brachii Without the Use of Interference Screws.
    Green JM; Getelman MH; Snyder SJ; Burns JP
    Arthroscopy; 2017 Jan; 33(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 27659242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes and Complications After Primary Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Versus Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis for Superior Labral Anterior-Posterior Tears or Biceps Abnormalities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Deng ZJ; Yin C; Cusano J; Abdul-Rassoul H; Curry EJ; Novikov D; Ma R; Li X
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2020 Aug; 8(8):2325967120945322. PubMed ID: 32923502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes of Biceps Tenotomy Versus Tenodesis During Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: An Analysis of Patients From a Large Multicenter Database.
    Srinivasan RC; Hao KA; Wright TW; Farmer KW; Wright JO; Roach RP; Moser MW; Freidl MC; Pazik M; King JJ
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2022 Jul; 10(7):23259671221110851. PubMed ID: 35859647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical and Biomechanical Evaluation of an All-Arthroscopic Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis.
    Kahlenberg CA; Patel RM; Nair R; Deshmane PP; Harnden G; Terry MA
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2014 Oct; 2(10):2325967114553558. PubMed ID: 26535276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined, Single-Anchor Subscapularis Tendon Repair and Proximal Biceps Tenodesis Leads to Improved Function and Decreased Pain at 1 Year.
    Bartlett L; Klein B; Brancato C; Akhavan S; Paci JM
    Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil; 2024 Apr; 6(2):100920. PubMed ID: 38550338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. All-arthroscopic suprapectoral versus open subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii.
    Gombera MM; Kahlenberg CA; Nair R; Saltzman MD; Terry MA
    Am J Sports Med; 2015 May; 43(5):1077-83. PubMed ID: 25817189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Arthroscopic Suprapectoral and Open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodeses Produce Similar Outcomes: A Randomized Prospective Analysis.
    Forsythe B; Zuke WA; Agarwalla A; Puzzitiello RN; Garcia GH; Cvetanovich GL; Yanke AB; Verma NN; Romeo AA
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Jan; 36(1):23-32. PubMed ID: 31864581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Arthroscopic proximal versus open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with arthroscopic repair of small- or medium-sized rotator cuff tears.
    Yi Y; Lee JM; Kwon SH; Kim JW
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Dec; 24(12):3772-3778. PubMed ID: 26040653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Outcomes 1 Year After Rotator Cuff Repair With and Without Concomitant Biceps Surgery.
    Watson ST; Robbins CB; Bedi A; Carpenter JE; Gagnier JJ; Miller BS
    Arthroscopy; 2017 Nov; 33(11):1928-1936. PubMed ID: 28822640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suprapectoral versus subpectoral tenodesis for Long Head Biceps Brachii tendinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    van Deurzen DFP; Gurnani N; Alta TDW; Willems JH; Onstenk R; van den Bekerom MPJ
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Jun; 106(4):693-700. PubMed ID: 32461094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Management of Failed Proximal Biceps Surgery: Clinical Outcomes After Revision to Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis.
    Savin DD; Waterman BR; Sumner S; Richardson C; Newgren J; Gowd AK; Romeo AA
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Feb; 48(2):460-465. PubMed ID: 31855452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimal clinically important differences after subpectoral biceps tenodesis: definition and retrospective assessment of predictive factors.
    Eguia FA; Ali I; Bansal A; McFarland EG; Srikumaran U
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7S):S41-S47. PubMed ID: 32643609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How can we define clinically important improvement in pain scores after biceps tenodesis?
    Lu Y; Beletsky A; Chahla J; Patel BH; Verma NN; Cole BJ; Forsythe B
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Feb; 30(2):430-438. PubMed ID: 32593673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.