BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37389476)

  • 1. Impact of Robotic Assistance on Complications in Bariatric Surgery at Expert Laparoscopic Surgery Centers: A Retrospective Comparative Study With Propensity Score.
    Caiazzo R; Bauvin P; Marciniak C; Saux P; Jacqmin G; Arnoux R; Benchetrit S; Dargent J; Chevallier JM; Frering V; Gugenheim J; Lechaux D; Msika S; Sterkers A; Topart P; Baud G; Pattou F;
    Ann Surg; 2023 Oct; 278(4):489-496. PubMed ID: 37389476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015-2016 MBSAQIP database.
    Sebastian R; Howell MH; Chang KH; Adrales G; Magnuson T; Schweitzer M; Nguyen H
    Surg Endosc; 2019 May; 33(5):1600-1612. PubMed ID: 30225604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic revisional bariatric surgery: perioperative outcomes from the MBSAQIP database.
    Nasser H; Munie S; Kindel TL; Gould JC; Higgins RM
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2020 Mar; 16(3):397-405. PubMed ID: 31932204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic approach to concurrent bariatric surgery and hiatal hernia repair: propensity score matching analysis using the 2015-2018 MBSAQIP.
    Sebastian R; Ghanem OM; Cornejo J; Ruttger T; Mayuiers M; Adrales G; Li C
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6886-6895. PubMed ID: 35020060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic bariatric procedures in super-obese patients: clinical and economic outcomes.
    Marincola G; Procopio PF; Pennestrì F; Gallucci P; Voloudakis N; Ciccoritti L; Greco F; Salvi G; Prioli F; De Crea C; Raffaelli M
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Jan; 18(1):34. PubMed ID: 38231461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Safety and learning curve of Da Vinci robotic single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy in the treatment of obesity patients].
    Wang L; Zhao YH; Wang ZY; Yu Y; Wang JF; Jiang T
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 May; 25(5):454-461. PubMed ID: 35599401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic vs laparoscopic approach for single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Pennestrì F; Sessa L; Prioli F; Gallucci P; Ciccoritti L; Greco F; De Crea C; Raffaelli M
    Updates Surg; 2023 Jan; 75(1):175-187. PubMed ID: 36161395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Longitudinal Efficiency of Robotic Surgery: an MBSAQIP Propensity Matched 4-Year Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery.
    Dudash M; Kuhn J; Dove J; Fluck M; Horsley R; Gabrielsen J; Daouadi M; Petrick AT; Parker DM
    Obes Surg; 2020 Oct; 30(10):3706-3713. PubMed ID: 32495073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surgical trainee impact on bariatric surgery safety.
    Goldberg I; Yang J; Park J; Pryor AD; Docimo S; Bates AT; Talamini MA; Spaniolas K
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Sep; 33(9):3014-3025. PubMed ID: 30426255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Impact of Robotics in Learning Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Retrospective Analysis of 214 Laparoscopic and Robotic Procedures : Robotic Vs. Laparoscopic RYGB.
    Beckmann JH; Bernsmeier A; Kersebaum JN; Mehdorn AS; von Schönfels W; Taivankhuu T; Laudes M; Schafmayer C; Egberts JH; Becker T
    Obes Surg; 2020 Jun; 30(6):2403-2410. PubMed ID: 32124220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Global benchmarks in primary robotic bariatric surgery redefine quality standards for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy.
    Giudicelli G; Gero D; Romulo L; Chirumamilla V; Iranmanesh P; Owen CK; Bauerle W; Garcia A; Lucas L; Mehdorn AS; Pandey D; Almuttawa A; Cabral F; Tiwari A; Lambert V; Pascotto B; De Meyere C; Yahyaoui M; Haist T; Scheffel O; Robert M; Nuytens F; Azagra S; Kow L; Prasad A; Vaz C; Vix M; Bindal V; Beckmann JH; Soussi D; Vilallonga R; El Chaar M; Wilson EB; Ahmad A; Teixeira A; Hagen ME; Toso C; Clavien PA; Puhan M; Bueter M; Jung MK
    Br J Surg; 2024 Jan; 111(1):. PubMed ID: 37981863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Outcomes in racial minorities after robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective review of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.
    Acevedo E; Lu X; Zhao H; Mazzei M; Sarvepalli S; Edwards MA
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2021 Mar; 17(3):595-605. PubMed ID: 33257274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic Bariatric Surgery in Older Adults, Is It Safer Than the Laparoscopic Approach? A 7-Year Analysis of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Database.
    Rahimi AO; Ashouri Y; Maegawa F; Hsu CH; Ghaderi I
    Obes Surg; 2023 Sep; 33(9):2671-2678. PubMed ID: 37434018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trends in the utilization and perioperative outcomes of primary robotic bariatric surgery from 2015 to 2018: a study of 46,764 patients from the MBSAQIP data registry.
    Tatarian T; Yang J; Wang J; Docimo S; Talamini M; Pryor AD; Spaniolas K
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jul; 35(7):3915-3922. PubMed ID: 32737605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve in the United States: a first comparative safety analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.
    Clapp B; Corbett J; Jordan M; Portela R; Ghanem OM
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2023 Jan; 19(1):11-17. PubMed ID: 36198497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Short-term Safety of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in the United States: 341 cases from MBSAQIP-accredited Centers.
    Jung JJ; Park AK; Witkowski ER; Hutter MM
    Surg Obes Relat Dis; 2022 Mar; 18(3):326-334. PubMed ID: 34896012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding the Current Role of Robotic-Assisted Bariatric Surgery.
    Dimou FM; Ackermann N; Chang SH; Freeman D; Eagon JC; Eckhouse SR
    Obes Surg; 2021 Jul; 31(7):3130-3137. PubMed ID: 33783678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes in conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted revisional bariatric surgery: a retrospective, case-controlled study of the MBSAQIP database.
    Acevedo E; Mazzei M; Zhao H; Lu X; Edwards MA
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1573-1584. PubMed ID: 31209611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perioperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic and Robotic Revisional Bariatric Surgery in a Complex Patient Population.
    Gray KD; Moore MD; Elmously A; Bellorin O; Zarnegar R; Dakin G; Pomp A; Afaneh C
    Obes Surg; 2018 Jul; 28(7):1852-1859. PubMed ID: 29417487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Analysis of early severe postoperative complications and risk factors in 4255 patients who underwent bariatric and metabolic surgery in a single cente].
    Liang H; Lin SB; Guan W; Li C; Shen JJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Oct; 25(10):899-905. PubMed ID: 36245115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.