These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
568 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37389908)
1. Reliability of Medical Information Provided by ChatGPT: Assessment Against Clinical Guidelines and Patient Information Quality Instrument. Walker HL; Ghani S; Kuemmerli C; Nebiker CA; Müller BP; Raptis DA; Staubli SM J Med Internet Res; 2023 Jun; 25():e47479. PubMed ID: 37389908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the Accuracy of Information on Medication Abortion: A Comparative Analysis of ChatGPT and Google Bard AI. Mediboina A; Badam RK; Chodavarapu S Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e51544. PubMed ID: 38318564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pilot Testing of a Tool to Standardize the Assessment of the Quality of Health Information Generated by Artificial Intelligence-Based Models. Sallam M; Barakat M; Sallam M Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e49373. PubMed ID: 38024074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does the Internet Provide Quality Information on Metoidioplasty? Using the Modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients Tool to Evaluate Artificial Intelligence-Generated and Online Information on Metoidioplasty. Hirpara MM; Amin L; Aloyan T; Shilleh N; Lewis P Ann Plast Surg; 2024 May; 92(5S Suppl 3):S361-S365. PubMed ID: 38689420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of Generative AI for Improving Health Literacy in Reproductive Health: Case Study. Burns C; Bakaj A; Berishaj A; Hristidis V; Deak P; Equils O JMIR Form Res; 2024 Aug; 8():e59434. PubMed ID: 38986153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the accuracy and reliability of AI chatbots in disseminating the content of current resuscitation guidelines: a comparative analysis between the ERC 2021 guidelines and both ChatGPTs 3.5 and 4. Beck S; Kuhner M; Haar M; Daubmann A; Semmann M; Kluge S Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2024 Sep; 32(1):95. PubMed ID: 39327587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of the Information provided by ChatGPT for Patients in Breast Plastic Surgery: Are we already in the future? Grippaudo FR; Nigrelli S; Patrignani A; Ribuffo D JPRAS Open; 2024 Jun; 40():99-105. PubMed ID: 38444627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of ChatGPT Compared to Clinical Practice Guidelines in Making Informed Decisions for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: A Cross-sectional Study. Gianola S; Bargeri S; Castellini G; Cook C; Palese A; Pillastrini P; Salvalaggio S; Turolla A; Rossettini G J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2024 Mar; 54(3):222-228. PubMed ID: 38284363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Artificial intelligence large language model ChatGPT: is it a trustworthy and reliable source of information for sarcoma patients? Valentini M; Szkandera J; Smolle MA; Scheipl S; Leithner A; Andreou D Front Public Health; 2024; 12():1303319. PubMed ID: 38584922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Potential of ChatGPT as a Self-Diagnostic Tool in Common Orthopedic Diseases: Exploratory Study. Kuroiwa T; Sarcon A; Ibara T; Yamada E; Yamamoto A; Tsukamoto K; Fujita K J Med Internet Res; 2023 Sep; 25():e47621. PubMed ID: 37713254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Doctor ChatGPT, Can You Help Me?" The Patient's Perspective: Cross-Sectional Study. Armbruster J; Bussmann F; Rothhaas C; Titze N; Grützner PA; Freischmidt H J Med Internet Res; 2024 Oct; 26():e58831. PubMed ID: 39352738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative analysis of AI-based chatbots: Assessing data quality in orthognathic surgery related patient information. Yurdakurban E; Topsakal KG; Duran GS J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Oct; 125(5):101757. PubMed ID: 38157937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating ChatGPT Responses on Thyroid Nodules for Patient Education. Campbell DJ; Estephan LE; Sina EM; Mastrolonardo EV; Alapati R; Amin DR; Cottrill EE Thyroid; 2024 Mar; 34(3):371-377. PubMed ID: 38010917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Unveiling the ChatGPT phenomenon: Evaluating the consistency and accuracy of endodontic question answers. Suárez A; Díaz-Flores García V; Algar J; Gómez Sánchez M; Llorente de Pedro M; Freire Y Int Endod J; 2024 Jan; 57(1):108-113. PubMed ID: 37814369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. ChatGPT as an information tool in rhinology. Can we trust each other today? Riestra-Ayora J; Vaduva C; Esteban-Sánchez J; Garrote-Garrote M; Fernández-Navarro C; Sánchez-Rodríguez C; Martin-Sanz E Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jun; 281(6):3253-3259. PubMed ID: 38436756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ChatGPT: Is this version good for healthcare and research? Vaishya R; Misra A; Vaish A Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2023 Apr; 17(4):102744. PubMed ID: 36989584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of information accuracy and clarity: ChatGPT responses to the most frequently asked questions about premature ejaculation. Şahin MF; Keleş A; Özcan R; Doğan Ç; Topkaç EC; Akgül M; Yazıci CM Sex Med; 2024 Jun; 12(3):qfae036. PubMed ID: 38832125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The promise and peril of using a large language model to obtain clinical information: ChatGPT performs strongly as a fertility counseling tool with limitations. Chervenak J; Lieman H; Blanco-Breindel M; Jindal S Fertil Steril; 2023 Sep; 120(3 Pt 2):575-583. PubMed ID: 37217092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using ChatGPT-4 to Create Structured Medical Notes From Audio Recordings of Physician-Patient Encounters: Comparative Study. Kernberg A; Gold JA; Mohan V J Med Internet Res; 2024 Apr; 26():e54419. PubMed ID: 38648636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]