These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37390072)

  • 1. Cracking double-blind review: Authorship attribution with deep learning.
    Bauersfeld L; Romero A; Muglikar M; Scaramuzza D
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0287611. PubMed ID: 37390072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coauthors' contributions to major papers published in the AJR: frequency of undeserved coauthorship.
    Slone RM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Sep; 167(3):571-9. PubMed ID: 8751654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Authorship attribution of source code by using back propagation neural network based on particle swarm optimization.
    Yang X; Xu G; Li Q; Guo Y; Zhang M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0187204. PubMed ID: 29095934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deep neural network and model-based clustering technique for forensic electronic mail author attribution.
    Apoorva KA; Sangeetha S
    SN Appl Sci; 2021; 3(3):348. PubMed ID: 33619463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can co-authorship networks be used to predict author research impact? A machine-learning based analysis within the field of degenerative cervical myelopathy research.
    Grodzinski N; Grodzinski B; Davies BM
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0256997. PubMed ID: 34473796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of Double-Blind Peer Review in an Imaging Subspecialty Journal.
    O'Connor EE; Cousar M; Lentini JA; Castillo M; Halm K; Zeffiro TA
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 Feb; 38(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 27856433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can anonymous posters on medical forums be reidentified?
    Bobicev V; Sokolova M; El Emam K; Jafer Y; Dewar B; Jonker E; Matwin S
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Oct; 15(10):e215. PubMed ID: 24091380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Authorship identification using ensemble learning.
    Abbasi A; Javed AR; Iqbal F; Jalil Z; Gadekallu TR; Kryvinska N
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jun; 12(1):9537. PubMed ID: 35680983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does double-blind peer review impact gender authorship trends? An evaluation of two leading neurosurgical journals from 2010 to 2019.
    Mahajan UV; Wadhwa H; Fatemi P; Xu S; Shan J; Benzil DL; Zygourakis CC
    J Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 135(2):352-360. PubMed ID: 33186905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hidden in plain sight? Identifying patient-authored publications.
    Oliver J; Lobban D; Dormer L; Walker J; Stephens R; Woolley K
    Res Involv Engagem; 2022 Apr; 8(1):12. PubMed ID: 35410628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bi-channel image registration and deep-learning segmentation (BIRDS) for efficient, versatile 3D mapping of mouse brain.
    Wang X; Zeng W; Yang X; Zhang Y; Fang C; Zeng S; Han Y; Fei P
    Elife; 2021 Jan; 10():. PubMed ID: 33459255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guest authorship and ghostwriting in publications related to rofecoxib: a case study of industry documents from rofecoxib litigation.
    Ross JS; Hill KP; Egilman DS; Krumholz HM
    JAMA; 2008 Apr; 299(15):1800-12. PubMed ID: 18413874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perish and publish: Dynamics of biomedical publications by deceased authors.
    Jung CH; Boutros PC; Park DJ; Corcoran NM; Pope BJ; Hovens CM
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0273783. PubMed ID: 36103484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review.
    Tomkins A; Zhang M; Heavlin WD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Nov; 114(48):12708-12713. PubMed ID: 29138317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Local and foreign authorship of maternal health interventional research in low- and middle-income countries: systematic mapping of publications 2000-2012.
    Chersich MF; Blaauw D; Dumbaugh M; Penn-Kekana L; Dhana A; Thwala S; Bijlmakers L; Vargas E; Kern E; Becerra-Posada F; Kavanagh J; Mannava P; Mlotshwa L; Becerril-Montekio V; Footman K; Rees H
    Global Health; 2016 Jun; 12(1):35. PubMed ID: 27338707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantifying the effect of editor-author relations on manuscript handling times.
    Sarigöl E; Garcia D; Scholtes I; Schweitzer F
    Scientometrics; 2017; 113(1):609-631. PubMed ID: 29056793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Publication Practices and Responsible Authorship: A Review Article.
    Tarkang EE; Kweku M; Zotor FB
    J Public Health Afr; 2017 Jun; 8(1):723. PubMed ID: 28748064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Applying Gini coefficient to evaluate the author research domains associated with the ordering of author names: A bibliometric study.
    Chien TW; Chow JC; Chang Y; Chou W
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(39):e12418. PubMed ID: 30278518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.