BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37391092)

  • 21. Pretreatment quantitative
    Gencturk M; Ozturk K; Koksel Y; Li F; Cayci Z
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 53():17-24. PubMed ID: 30308429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical value of metabolic PET parameters of primary vulvar carcinoma.
    Yanarateş A; Budak E; Budak A; Inan AH; Kanmaz AG; Oral A; Yazici B
    Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol (Engl Ed); 2021; 40(6):367-371. PubMed ID: 34752370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prognostic Value of the Sum of Metabolic Tumor Volume of Primary Tumor and Lymph Nodes Using 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients With Cervical Cancer.
    Hong JH; Min KJ; Lee JK; So KA; Jung US; Kim S; Eo JS
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Mar; 95(9):e2992. PubMed ID: 26945420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimal FDG PET/CT volumetric parameters for risk stratification in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results from the ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235 trial.
    Salavati A; Duan F; Snyder BS; Wei B; Houshmand S; Khiewvan B; Opanowski A; Simone CB; Siegel BA; Machtay M; Alavi A
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Nov; 44(12):1969-1983. PubMed ID: 28689281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The prognostic value of the ratio of standard uptake value of lymph node to primary tumor before treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
    Lou Y; Chen D; Lin Z; Sun J; Song L; Chen W; Zhang M; Chen Y
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Jan; 280(1):347-356. PubMed ID: 35932312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prognostic significance of metabolic parameters measured by
    Chang H; Lee SJ; Lim J; Lee JS; Kim YJ; Lee WW
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2019 May; 145(5):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 30900157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prognostic role of baseline
    Albano D; Bosio G; Camoni L; Farina M; Re A; Tucci A; Giubbini R; Bertagna F
    Hematol Oncol; 2019 Feb; 37(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 30299563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Predictive significance of pretreatment
    El-Hennawy G; ElMenawi S; Nasr Said E; Zekri W; Zaghloul M; Elsalam AMA; El-Fendy H; Elantably I
    Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2024 Jul; 71(7):e30998. PubMed ID: 38650170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prognostic value of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lin J; Xie G; Liao G; Wang B; Yan M; Li H; Yuan Y
    Oncotarget; 2017 May; 8(20):33884-33896. PubMed ID: 27980228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Texture analysis of
    Nakajo M; Jinguji M; Nakabeppu Y; Nakajo M; Higashi R; Fukukura Y; Sasaki K; Uchikado Y; Natsugoe S; Yoshiura T
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Feb; 44(2):206-214. PubMed ID: 27613542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Prognostic value of pretreatment (18)F-FDG PET-CT metabolic parameters in patients with advanced extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma].
    Wu LL; Liang JH; Wang L; Xu W; Ding CY
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 41(11):831-836. PubMed ID: 31770850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis from ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in lymph node metastases and risk stratification of endometrial carcinoma.
    Liu DD; Li J; Li X; Xie L; Qin L; Peng F; Cheng MH
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 30(6):e89. PubMed ID: 31576685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retrospective analysis of the
    Yang Y; Pan YQ; Wang M; Gu S; Bao W
    Radiat Oncol; 2023 Dec; 18(1):196. PubMed ID: 38049843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Tumor and metastatic lymph nodes metabolic activity on
    Song J; Pang W; Yi H; Ji J; Ye X; Li L
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2024 Mar; 49(3):975-984. PubMed ID: 38302763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Prediction of distant metastasis and survival in adenoid cystic carcinoma using quantitative
    Lim WS; Oh JS; Roh JL; Kim JS; Kim SJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
    Oral Oncol; 2018 Feb; 77():98-104. PubMed ID: 29362133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The correlation of
    Qu YH; Long N; Ran C; Sun J
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2021 Mar; 23(3):620-627. PubMed ID: 32683540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The value on SUV-derived parameters assessed on
    Liao X; Liu M; Li S; Huang W; Guo C; Liu J; Xiong Y; Zhang J; Fan Y; Wang R
    BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Apr; 23(1):49. PubMed ID: 37020286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer.
    Liao S; Penney BC; Wroblewski K; Zhang H; Simon CA; Kampalath R; Shih MC; Shimada N; Chen S; Salgia R; Appelbaum DE; Suzuki K; Chen CT; Pu Y
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Jan; 39(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 21946983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis on Preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.
    Lee JW; Kang CM; Choi HJ; Lee WJ; Song SY; Lee JH; Lee JD
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Jun; 55(6):898-904. PubMed ID: 24711649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Confirmation of the prognostic value of pretherapeutic tumor SUR and MTV in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Hofheinz F; Li Y; Steffen IG; Lin Q; Lili C; Hua W; van den Hoff J; Zschaeck S
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jul; 46(7):1485-1494. PubMed ID: 30949816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.