These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37392403)
1. Automated Estimation of Aquifer Parameters from Arbitrary-Rate Pumping Tests in Python and MATLAB. Benson DA Ground Water; 2024; 62(2):285-294. PubMed ID: 37392403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How to Find Aquifer Statistics Utilizing Pumping Tests? Two Field Studies Using welltestpy. Müller S; Leven C; Dietrich P; Attinger S; Zech A Ground Water; 2022 Jan; 60(1):137-144. PubMed ID: 34231221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Type-Curve Method for the Analysis of Pumping Tests with Piecewise-Linear Pumping Rates. Zhuang C; Li Y; Zhou Z; Illman WA; Dou Z; Wang J; Yan L Ground Water; 2020 Sep; 58(5):788-798. PubMed ID: 31970755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Simplified Solution Using Izbash's Equation for Non-Darcian Flow in a Constant Rate Pumping Test. Xiao L; Ye M; Xu Y; Gan F Ground Water; 2019 Nov; 57(6):962-968. PubMed ID: 30937895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The unusual and large drawdown response of buried-valley aquifers to pumping. van der Kamp G; Maathuis H Ground Water; 2012; 50(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 21671937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detecting drawdowns masked by environmental stresses with water-level models. Garcia CA; Halford KJ; Fenelon JM Ground Water; 2013; 51(3):322-32. PubMed ID: 23469925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flowing Well-Time-Domain Solution and Inverse Problem Revisited. Perina T Ground Water; 2021 May; 59(3):438-442. PubMed ID: 33314058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Solutions for Groundwater Flow to a Pumping Well with an Exponentially Decreasing Variable-Rate in a Sloping Aquifer. Guo Z; Wen Z; Jakada H Ground Water; 2022 Nov; 60(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 35388495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of Groundwater Level Fluctuations near an Operating Water Supply Well to Estimate Aquifer Transmissivity. Pozdniakov S; Ivanov P; Davis P; Sizov N Ground Water; 2021 Jan; 59(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 32588432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of pumping induced flow in observation wells during aquifer testing. Székely F Ground Water; 2013; 51(5):762-7. PubMed ID: 23198759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interpretation of Pumping Tests in Heterogeneous Aquifers with Constant Head Boundary. Pechstein A; Copty NK Ground Water; 2021 Jul; 59(4):517-523. PubMed ID: 33389747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multidepth pumping tests in deep aquifers. Alam N; Olsthoorn TN Ground Water; 2014 Sep; 52 Suppl 1():148-60. PubMed ID: 24428328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Groundwater modeling of Saq Aquifer Buraydah Al Qassim for better water management strategies. Al-Salamah IS; Ghazaw YM; Ghumman AR Environ Monit Assess; 2011 Feb; 173(1-4):851-60. PubMed ID: 20364311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interaction of Aquifer and River-Canal Network near Well Field. Ghosh NC; Mishra GC; Sandhu CS; Grischek T; Singh VV Ground Water; 2015; 53(5):794-805. PubMed ID: 25294130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual-Screened Vertical Circulation Wells for Groundwater Lowering in Unconfined Aquifers. Jin Y; Holzbecher E; Sauter M Ground Water; 2016 Jan; 54(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 25801278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimating confined aquifer parameters using a simple derivative-based method. Naderi M Heliyon; 2019 Oct; 5(10):e02657. PubMed ID: 31667437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved characterization of small "u" for Jacob pumping test analysis methods. Alexander SC; Saar MO Ground Water; 2012; 50(2):256-65. PubMed ID: 21745205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A single recovery type curve from Theis' exact solution. Samani N; Pasandi M Ground Water; 2003; 41(5):602-7. PubMed ID: 13678114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]