These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Facilitatory and inhibitory after-effect of spatially localized grating adaptation. Ejima Y; Takahashi S Vision Res; 1984; 24(9):979-85. PubMed ID: 6506486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grating induction: a new type of aftereffect. Tyler CW; Nakayama K Vision Res; 1980; 20(5):437-41. PubMed ID: 7414978 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast, spatial frequency and test duration effects on the tilt aftereffect: implications for underlying mechanisms. Harris JP; Calvert JE Vision Res; 1989; 29(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 2773330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of localized grating adaptation as a function of separation along the length axis between test and adaptation areas. Ejima Y; Takahashi S Vision Res; 1985; 25(11):1701-7. PubMed ID: 3832594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A study of interocular transfer of spatial adaptation. Bjørklund RA; Magnussen S Perception; 1981; 10(5):511-8. PubMed ID: 7339569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What causes decay of pattern-contingent chromatic aftereffects? MacKay DM; MacKay V Vision Res; 1975 Mar; 15(3):462-4. PubMed ID: 1136167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The time course of adaptation to spatial contrast. Greenlee MW; Georgeson MA; Magnussen S; Harris JP Vision Res; 1991; 31(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 2017883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is the size aftereffect direction selective? Nishida S; Motoyoshi I; Takeuchi T Vision Res; 1999 Oct; 39(21):3592-601. PubMed ID: 10746129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interocular transfer of the motion after-effect is not reduced by binocular rivalry. O'Shea RP; Crassini B Vision Res; 1981; 21(6):801-4. PubMed ID: 7314456 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]