188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37392608)
1. Use of risk assessment and predictive microbiology in regulatory science related to the scientific opinions of the EFSA BIOHAZ Panel.
Messens W; Bover-Cid S; Hempen M; Lindqvist R; Nauta M; Skandamis PN; Stella P; Koutsoumanis K
Int J Food Microbiol; 2023 Oct; 403():110302. PubMed ID: 37392608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk assessment of biological hazards in the European Union.
Hugas M; Tsigarida E; Robinson T; Calistri P
Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Nov; 120(1-2):131-5. PubMed ID: 17659800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The principles and methods behind EFSA's Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessment.
; Benford D; Halldorsson T; Jeger MJ; Knutsen HK; More S; Naegeli H; Noteborn H; Ockleford C; Ricci A; Rychen G; Schlatter JR; Silano V; Solecki R; Turck D; Younes M; Craig P; Hart A; Von Goetz N; Koutsoumanis K; Mortensen A; Ossendorp B; Germini A; Martino L; Merten C; Mosbach-Schulz O; Smith A; Hardy A
EFSA J; 2018 Jan; 16(1):e05122. PubMed ID: 32625670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. EFSA's framework for evidence-based scientific assessments: A case study on uncertainty analysis.
Aiassa E; Merten C; Martino L
ALTEX; 2022; 39(3):451–462. PubMed ID: 34185094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. EFSA's scientific activities and achievements on the risk assessment of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) during its first decade of existence: looking back and ahead.
Devos Y; Aguilera J; Diveki Z; Gomes A; Liu Y; Paoletti C; du Jardin P; Herman L; Perry JN; Waigmann E
Transgenic Res; 2014 Feb; 23(1):1-25. PubMed ID: 23963741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 'MicroHibro': A software tool for predictive microbiology and microbial risk assessment in foods.
González SC; Possas A; Carrasco E; Valero A; Bolívar A; Posada-Izquierdo GD; García-Gimeno RM; Zurera G; Pérez-Rodríguez F
Int J Food Microbiol; 2019 Feb; 290():226-236. PubMed ID: 30368088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Integrating surveillance of animal health, food pathogens and foodborne disease in the European Union.
Berthe F; Hugas M; Makela P
Rev Sci Tech; 2013 Aug; 32(2):521-8. PubMed ID: 24547655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Principles for the risk assessment of genetically modified microorganisms and their food products in the European Union.
Aguilera J; Gomes AR; Olaru I
Int J Food Microbiol; 2013 Oct; 167(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 23632210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific motivations and criteria to consider updating EFSA scientific assessments.
; Hardy A; Benford D; Halldorsson T; Jeger MJ; Knutsen KH; More S; Mortensen A; Naegeli H; Noteborn H; Ockleford C; Ricci A; Rychen G; Schlatter JR; Silano V; Solecki R; Turck D; Brock T; Chesson A; Karenlampi S; Lambre C; Sanz Y; Goumperis T; Kleiner J; Maurici D
EFSA J; 2017 Mar; 15(3):e04737. PubMed ID: 32625443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Guidance on the requirements for the development of microbiological criteria.
; Ricci A; Allende A; Bolton D; Chemaly M; Davies R; Fernández Escámez PS; Girones R; Herman L; Koutsoumanis K; Lindqvist R; Robertson L; Ru G; Sanaa M; Simmons M; Skandamis P; Snary E; Speybroeck N; Ter Kuile B; Threlfall J; Wahlström H; Andersen JK; Uyttendaele M; Valero A; Da Silva Felício MT; Messens W; Nørrung B
EFSA J; 2017 Nov; 15(11):e05052. PubMed ID: 32625345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive modelling of the growth and survival of Listeria in fishery products.
Ross T; Dalgaard P; Tienungoon S
Int J Food Microbiol; 2000 Dec; 62(3):231-45. PubMed ID: 11156267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative microbial risk assessment of Salmonella in fresh chicken patties.
Stathas L; Aspridou Z; Koutsoumanis K
Food Res Int; 2024 Feb; 178():113960. PubMed ID: 38309878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative risk assessment for Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef hamburgers.
Cassin MH; Lammerding AM; Todd EC; Ross W; McColl RS
Int J Food Microbiol; 1998 May; 41(1):21-44. PubMed ID: 9631335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advances in multi-omics based quantitative microbial risk assessment in the dairy sector: A semi-systematic review.
Joshi A; Bhardwaj D; Kaushik A; Juneja VK; Taneja P; Thakur S; Kumra Taneja N
Food Res Int; 2022 Jun; 156():111323. PubMed ID: 35651076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evidence-based semiquantitative methodology for prioritization of foodborne zoonoses.
Cardoen S; Van Huffel X; Berkvens D; Quoilin S; Ducoffre G; Saegerman C; Speybroeck N; Imberechts H; Herman L; Ducatelle R; Dierick K
Foodborne Pathog Dis; 2009 Nov; 6(9):1083-96. PubMed ID: 19715429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative microbiological risk assessment in food industry: Theory and practical application.
Membré JM; Boué G
Food Res Int; 2018 Apr; 106():1132-1139. PubMed ID: 29579908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modelling bacterial growth in quantitative microbiological risk assessment: is it possible?
Nauta MJ
Int J Food Microbiol; 2002 Mar; 73(2-3):297-304. PubMed ID: 11934037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA.
; Ricci A; Allende A; Bolton D; Chemaly M; Davies R; Girones R; Herman L; Koutsoumanis K; Lindqvist R; Nørrung B; Robertson L; Ru G; Sanaa M; Simmons M; Skandamis P; Snary E; Speybroeck N; Ter Kuile B; Threlfall J; Wahlström H; Cocconcelli PS; Klein G; Prieto Maradona M; Querol A; Peixe L; Suarez JE; Sundh I; Vlak JM; Aguilera-Gómez M; Barizzone F; Brozzi R; Correia S; Heng L; Istace F; Lythgo C; Fernández Escámez PS
EFSA J; 2017 Mar; 15(3):e04664. PubMed ID: 32625421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Systematic Review of Beef Meat Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment Models.
Tesson V; Federighi M; Cummins E; de Oliveira Mota J; Guillou S; Boué G
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jan; 17(3):. PubMed ID: 31973083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antimicrobial resistance monitoring projects for zoonotic and indicator bacteria of animal origin: common aspects and differences between EASSA and EFSA.
Moyaert H; de Jong A; Simjee S; Thomas V
Vet Microbiol; 2014 Jul; 171(3-4):279-83. PubMed ID: 24674741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]