These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37392808)
1. Evaluating the influence of anatomical accuracy and electrode positions on EEG forward solutions. Nielsen JD; Puonti O; Xue R; Thielscher A; Madsen KH Neuroimage; 2023 Aug; 277():120259. PubMed ID: 37392808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The New York Head-A precise standardized volume conductor model for EEG source localization and tES targeting. Huang Y; Parra LC; Haufe S Neuroimage; 2016 Oct; 140():150-62. PubMed ID: 26706450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model. Fuchs M; Kastner J; Wagner M; Hawes S; Ebersole JS Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 May; 113(5):702-12. PubMed ID: 11976050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of volume conductor and source models to localize epileptic foci. Fuchs M; Wagner M; Kastner J J Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 24(2):101-19. PubMed ID: 17414966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of forward model errors on EEG source localization. Akalin Acar Z; Makeig S Brain Topogr; 2013 Jul; 26(3):378-96. PubMed ID: 23355112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of EEG Source Localization Using Simplified and Anatomically Accurate Head Models in Younger and Older Adults. Liu C; Downey RJ; Mu Y; Richer N; Hwang J; Shah VA; Sato SD; Clark DJ; Hass CJ; Manini TM; Seidler RD; Ferris DP IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():2591-2602. PubMed ID: 37252873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Forward and inverse effects of the complete electrode model in neonatal EEG. Pursiainen S; Lew S; Wolters CH J Neurophysiol; 2017 Mar; 117(3):876-884. PubMed ID: 27852731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A guideline for head volume conductor modeling in EEG and MEG. Vorwerk J; Cho JH; Rampp S; Hamer H; Knösche TR; Wolters CH Neuroimage; 2014 Oct; 100():590-607. PubMed ID: 24971512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A realistic, accurate and fast source modeling approach for the EEG forward problem. Miinalainen T; Rezaei A; Us D; Nüßing A; Engwer C; Wolters CH; Pursiainen S Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():56-67. PubMed ID: 30165251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic skull segmentation from MR images for realistic volume conductor models of the head: Assessment of the state-of-the-art. Nielsen JD; Madsen KH; Puonti O; Siebner HR; Bauer C; Madsen CG; Saturnino GB; Thielscher A Neuroimage; 2018 Jul; 174():587-598. PubMed ID: 29518567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incorporating and Compensating Cerebrospinal Fluid in Surface-Based Forward Models of Magneto- and Electroencephalography. Stenroos M; Nummenmaa A PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0159595. PubMed ID: 27472278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated detection and labeling of high-density EEG electrodes from structural MR images. Marino M; Liu Q; Brem S; Wenderoth N; Mantini D J Neural Eng; 2016 Oct; 13(5):056003. PubMed ID: 27484621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of structural complexities in head modeling on the accuracy of EEG source localization in neonates. Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F J Neural Eng; 2020 Oct; 17(5):056004. PubMed ID: 32942266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Algorithm to find high density EEG scalp coordinates and analysis of their correspondence to structural and functional regions of the brain. Giacometti P; Perdue KL; Diamond SG J Neurosci Methods; 2014 May; 229():84-96. PubMed ID: 24769168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating a neutral reference for electroencephalographic recordings: the importance of using a high-density montage and a realistic head model. Liu Q; Balsters JH; Baechinger M; van der Groen O; Wenderoth N; Mantini D J Neural Eng; 2015 Oct; 12(5):056012. PubMed ID: 26305167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian model selection of template forward models for EEG source reconstruction. Strobbe G; van Mierlo P; De Vos M; Mijović B; Hallez H; Van Huffel S; López JD; Vandenberghe S Neuroimage; 2014 Jun; 93 Pt 1():11-22. PubMed ID: 24582919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Review on solving the forward problem in EEG source analysis. Hallez H; Vanrumste B; Grech R; Muscat J; De Clercq W; Vergult A; D'Asseler Y; Camilleri KP; Fabri SG; Van Huffel S; Lemahieu I J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 4():46. PubMed ID: 18053144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forward field computation with OpenMEEG. Gramfort A; Papadopoulo T; Olivi E; Clerc M Comput Intell Neurosci; 2011; 2011():923703. PubMed ID: 21437231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison between realistic and spherical approaches in EEG forward modelling. Meneghini F; Vatta F; Esposito F; Mininel S; Di Salle F Biomed Tech (Berl); 2010 Jun; 55(3):133-46. PubMed ID: 20178450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]